avatar
Paper help! Thanks!# Chemistry - 化学
d*l
1
现在卡在下面这步了:
您的“J-1签证豁免” 申请已经报送中国驻美国大使馆教育处进行最终审批。
5月22日收到上面的通知,到目前位置没有下一步的任何进度?请问同批次的,你们的
有结果了吗?
非常着急,不知道怎么催,哪一步可以催?
avatar
w*n
2
可以夫妻一个人做standard deductible,12k的。 另一个做itemized deductible,
SALT有5k,再把mortgage interest之类的全加进去吗?会有啥问题,对child credit
有影响吗?
avatar
z*i
3
In the first sentence of the book, the Moon blew up. And soon everyone knew
what kind of disaster would happen next. It is a shocking first chapter
indeed, but the book only gets better from here. Like a thought experiment,
here is the initial condition and here is a systemic shock, and now let’s
see how the system will go and change from here, in great detail. Actually
Neal Stephenson went on for 800+ of pages of detailed world-building, with
some brilliant twists and turns of the plot as well.
The book is definitely sci-fi, but it is kind of funny that the technologies
described in 2 of the 3 sections of the book are not speculative or
futuristic. They are actually today’s existing tech put into a hypothetical
disaster scenario. Stephenson showed us what amazing things those
technologies can achieve, e.g. bringing the ice core of a solar comet back
using some nuclear steam-punk set-up. The name of the book is awesome too; a
blatant spoiler right in front of the reader’s eyes, but all secrets are
kept well until the reader realizes what it actually means... And then, BOOM
~ 5000 years later...Despite the book is all about details, still a lot of
details in the book are in fact left out unsubstantiated (let's say ... half
?). Well, the world is built, maybe more books about that world will come
later. I certainly hope.
Behind his 800+ pages of technical calculations and space maneuvers, and
5000+ years of disaster, survival, evolution and development (all logically
deducted from scientific facts and theories), Stephenson was actually an
extreme optimist of the capacity of human race. The Spacers, the Pingers,
and the Diggers all survived the hard rain. This puts the success rate of
the types of “arks” to at least 75%. And if the Martians somehow managed
as well (for some reason we were not told whether they made it or not), the
rate will be a mind-blowing 100%. That, together with that there were no
major conflicts/wars/chaos before the Hard Rain (yeah, Venezuelan Navy was
nuked, but it was sort of OK...), are something only the most optimistic of
human race could write.
Another thing interesting is that at the beginning of the book, Stephenson
gave the “power” that broke the Moon into pieces a name – “Agent”. And
then 5000 years later it was resonated by a movement of the spacers called
“Purpose”. The words don’t appear often in the story, just mentioned a
few times here and there. While reading, I felt there was something behind
these names – something either conspiracy-like or alien-related. But in the
end there was not. I don't feel cheated though. The truth is that shit
happens. Good or bad, disaster or miracle, they are simply results of
randomness of our universe. People sometimes find it hard to accept the
randomness and want to find some “reason” or “purpose” behind them. They
coin terms and develop theories to satisfy their minds and direct their
efforts and behaviors. All these are just human nature and there might not
be much more than that, though Stephenson did subtly acknowledge some of the
benefit of this reason/purpose-seeking in the book. Being a sort of an
atheist, I found myself in agreement with him on this part.
Rating: 5/5.
Favorite details of the book: Dinah bringing Ymir back alone. Moirans’
ability of going “epi”.
avatar
a*u
4
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
runsun (runsun) 于 (Thu Sep 3 02:29:33 2009, 美东) 提到:
以下出自pathtotruth的俱乐部
http://mitbbs.com/clubarticle_t/PathToTruth/31174595.html

禅定是什么都还未必清楚,怎么个禅定?如果立某个东西为目标,是不是起码得搞清楚
禅定到底是什么。

惨了,如此永远不可能有禅定。因为这是在玩弄一个根本就不存在的所谓“心行”,否
认自己的意识,感觉,试图寻找某个神秘的“心行”。这导致方向的完全错误。
经典上何处说有什么心行,如果经典上没有,如何能确信有这个东西?
本来禅定只是简单的使得意识高度纯净,集中于单一的所缘上,但是这个人却对本来要
进行修的“意识”完全否定,这将使得他的意识将难以真正集中于本来要选择的所缘,
他不断的在自己找麻烦。左右手互搏。
当然,随着散乱的降低,这个人可能找到所谓的“心行”,以为它和意识感觉不同,而
其实那只是细微的比较少散乱心的清明度比较强的意识。
如此打坐,
avatar
F*u
6
married filing separately如果一方itemized deduction,另一方不能用standard
deduction

credit

【在 w***n 的大作中提到】
: 可以夫妻一个人做standard deductible,12k的。 另一个做itemized deductible,
: SALT有5k,再把mortgage interest之类的全加进去吗?会有啥问题,对child credit
: 有影响吗?

avatar
a*5
7
purpose seeking是人对日常经验的自然外延,可惜是invalid的

knew
,
technologies
hypothetical

【在 z*i 的大作中提到】
: In the first sentence of the book, the Moon blew up. And soon everyone knew
: what kind of disaster would happen next. It is a shocking first chapter
: indeed, but the book only gets better from here. Like a thought experiment,
: here is the initial condition and here is a systemic shock, and now let’s
: see how the system will go and change from here, in great detail. Actually
: Neal Stephenson went on for 800+ of pages of detailed world-building, with
: some brilliant twists and turns of the plot as well.
: The book is definitely sci-fi, but it is kind of funny that the technologies
: described in 2 of the 3 sections of the book are not speculative or
: futuristic. They are actually today’s existing tech put into a hypothetical

avatar
b*s
8
Neal's science fiction can be quite parculiar. Quoting from a forum comment:
"Like Victor Hugo and Umberto Eco, Stephenson uses (sometimes, pages of)
this so-called showy trivia to allow the reader to understand pertinent and
fascinating details about human relationships, physical phenomena,
regulations of social castes, progression of technology, etc., in ways
impossible without said trivia. I've read everything Stephenson has written
and I love that he, without fail, educates me as well as entertains."
Another one:
"He can't end a book to save his life (save Reamde). He once spent 20 pages
very early in a 1,000 page book taking about 17th century numismatica. He
once spent ten pages talking about Captain Crunch. He celebrates competant
people, guns, libertarianism, the military, capitalism and rugged
individualism but he's hardly right wing. He's a sci-fi writer more
fascinated with the past than the future. He's endlessly sarcastic and
sardonic but he's also almost entirely optimistic and celebratory of human
accomplishment. He focuses on world bulding, philosophical concepts,
architecture and engineering far more than he focuses on plot, indeed some
of his (1,000 page) books barely have a plot. He's nerdy but not dorky: he
might include a rocket ship in his books but it's a realistic, carefully
considered (and carefully explained) rocket ship that's there for a distinct
, practical purpose, not simply because rocket ships are fun. You often have
to reread his books to understand what the hell is going on. He's probably
my favorite writer but I have a hard time selling him to others. Of course I
'll be getting this."
I agree with most of it...

knew
,
technologies
hypothetical

【在 z*i 的大作中提到】
: In the first sentence of the book, the Moon blew up. And soon everyone knew
: what kind of disaster would happen next. It is a shocking first chapter
: indeed, but the book only gets better from here. Like a thought experiment,
: here is the initial condition and here is a systemic shock, and now let’s
: see how the system will go and change from here, in great detail. Actually
: Neal Stephenson went on for 800+ of pages of detailed world-building, with
: some brilliant twists and turns of the plot as well.
: The book is definitely sci-fi, but it is kind of funny that the technologies
: described in 2 of the 3 sections of the book are not speculative or
: futuristic. They are actually today’s existing tech put into a hypothetical

avatar
b*s
9
I also noticed that if you love Umberto Eco, you will love Neal Stephenson,
and of course, Victor Hugo. Some hates those "digressions", or info dumps,
but for me, they are the choice bites.

comment:
and
written
pages

【在 b*s 的大作中提到】
: Neal's science fiction can be quite parculiar. Quoting from a forum comment:
: "Like Victor Hugo and Umberto Eco, Stephenson uses (sometimes, pages of)
: this so-called showy trivia to allow the reader to understand pertinent and
: fascinating details about human relationships, physical phenomena,
: regulations of social castes, progression of technology, etc., in ways
: impossible without said trivia. I've read everything Stephenson has written
: and I love that he, without fail, educates me as well as entertains."
: Another one:
: "He can't end a book to save his life (save Reamde). He once spent 20 pages
: very early in a 1,000 page book taking about 17th century numismatica. He

avatar
b*s
10

technologies
hypothetical
a
BOOM
half
这个我看的时候也想到了。其实这个跟凡尔纳的科幻类似:凡尔纳想到的那些,其实在
他那个时代已经是可以实现的技术了,并不是特别的超前的想法。潜水艇的基本原理和
操纵方式已经在那里了,热气球和飞艇的基本原理都已经搞清了。而且他跟凡尔纳一样
,也注重细节。阿波罗宇航员都曾经说过,凡尔纳的登月计算跟后来的实际登月好多数
据都是吻合的……
Stephenson的那些轨道力学好像是有专家帮忙验算的……

【在 z*i 的大作中提到】
: In the first sentence of the book, the Moon blew up. And soon everyone knew
: what kind of disaster would happen next. It is a shocking first chapter
: indeed, but the book only gets better from here. Like a thought experiment,
: here is the initial condition and here is a systemic shock, and now let’s
: see how the system will go and change from here, in great detail. Actually
: Neal Stephenson went on for 800+ of pages of detailed world-building, with
: some brilliant twists and turns of the plot as well.
: The book is definitely sci-fi, but it is kind of funny that the technologies
: described in 2 of the 3 sections of the book are not speculative or
: futuristic. They are actually today’s existing tech put into a hypothetical

avatar
z*i
11
他在Bezos的Blue Origins里搞了一段时间。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Origin

【在 b*s 的大作中提到】
:
: technologies
: hypothetical
: a
: BOOM
: half
: 这个我看的时候也想到了。其实这个跟凡尔纳的科幻类似:凡尔纳想到的那些,其实在
: 他那个时代已经是可以实现的技术了,并不是特别的超前的想法。潜水艇的基本原理和
: 操纵方式已经在那里了,热气球和飞艇的基本原理都已经搞清了。而且他跟凡尔纳一样
: ,也注重细节。阿波罗宇航员都曾经说过,凡尔纳的登月计算跟后来的实际登月好多数

avatar
z*i
12
说白了不就是迷信么。lol

【在 a****5 的大作中提到】
: purpose seeking是人对日常经验的自然外延,可惜是invalid的
:
: knew
: ,
: technologies
: hypothetical

avatar
z*i
14
好像思维的严谨更像Bezos, 干事的雷厉风行和大嘴巴更像Musk. lol

【在 b*s 的大作中提到】
: Sean Probst是Bezos?或者更像是Elon Musk?
avatar
b*s
15

logically
Actually, that's not the case. He didn't write those who had prepared, but
did not manage to survive. 75% is just a percentage of his characters he
actually described, not the whole human race in the book.

【在 z*i 的大作中提到】
: 好像思维的严谨更像Bezos, 干事的雷厉风行和大嘴巴更像Musk. lol
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。