AutoCAD工作中重要吗？# CivilEngineering - 土木工程
f*e
1 楼
AutoCAD对搞结构的人，工作中重要吗？我这个方面很菜的，主要是没用他做过什么大
的project， 所以不是很熟。
但对有限元三维建模很熟。赫赫
的project， 所以不是很熟。
但对有限元三维建模很熟。赫赫
j*n
2 楼
对结构不熟，但是好像autocad在civil engineering中挺重要的，尤其是画图
【在 f*********e 的大作中提到】
: AutoCAD对搞结构的人，工作中重要吗？我这个方面很菜的，主要是没用他做过什么大
: 的project， 所以不是很熟。
: 但对有限元三维建模很熟。赫赫
【在 f*********e 的大作中提到】
: AutoCAD对搞结构的人，工作中重要吗？我这个方面很菜的，主要是没用他做过什么大
: 的project， 所以不是很熟。
: 但对有限元三维建模很熟。赫赫
y*o
3 楼
you'll pick up quickly once you start to use it intensively. don't worry, it
's never a problem.
CAD, computer aided design, of course is useful for designs, hehe.
【在 f*********e 的大作中提到】
: AutoCAD对搞结构的人，工作中重要吗？我这个方面很菜的，主要是没用他做过什么大
: 的project， 所以不是很熟。
: 但对有限元三维建模很熟。赫赫
's never a problem.
CAD, computer aided design, of course is useful for designs, hehe.
【在 f*********e 的大作中提到】
: AutoCAD对搞结构的人，工作中重要吗？我这个方面很菜的，主要是没用他做过什么大
: 的project， 所以不是很熟。
: 但对有限元三维建模很熟。赫赫
d*n
4 楼
It's easy to begin with, say, 2 days at most, to make you draw a few lines a
nd add a few annotations on to a dwg file
but it takes a lot of time to finally be proficient, and you'd have to refer
to the help from time to time even you're a senior engineer.
just have a galance at the user manual, there're thousands of pages. fortuna
tely we don't need to know everything about the software.
and if you're gonna develop sth with it it'll be another issue which costs t
remendous time from your schedu
【在 y*****o 的大作中提到】
: you'll pick up quickly once you start to use it intensively. don't worry, it
: 's never a problem.
: CAD, computer aided design, of course is useful for designs, hehe.
nd add a few annotations on to a dwg file
but it takes a lot of time to finally be proficient, and you'd have to refer
to the help from time to time even you're a senior engineer.
just have a galance at the user manual, there're thousands of pages. fortuna
tely we don't need to know everything about the software.
and if you're gonna develop sth with it it'll be another issue which costs t
remendous time from your schedu
【在 y*****o 的大作中提到】
: you'll pick up quickly once you start to use it intensively. don't worry, it
: 's never a problem.
: CAD, computer aided design, of course is useful for designs, hehe.
t*e
5 楼
Agree. I am using it everyday in site development. Buy a book and practice
by yourself will help. Mostly you will be proficient if you use it almost
everyday.
But some company use MicroStation. I tried to learn it, still not good at it
because not use it everyday.
a
refer
fortuna
t
【在 d*n 的大作中提到】
: It's easy to begin with, say, 2 days at most, to make you draw a few lines a
: nd add a few annotations on to a dwg file
: but it takes a lot of time to finally be proficient, and you'd have to refer
: to the help from time to time even you're a senior engineer.
: just have a galance at the user manual, there're thousands of pages. fortuna
: tely we don't need to know everything about the software.
: and if you're gonna develop sth with it it'll be another issue which costs t
: remendous time from your schedu
by yourself will help. Mostly you will be proficient if you use it almost
everyday.
But some company use MicroStation. I tried to learn it, still not good at it
because not use it everyday.
a
refer
fortuna
t
【在 d*n 的大作中提到】
: It's easy to begin with, say, 2 days at most, to make you draw a few lines a
: nd add a few annotations on to a dwg file
: but it takes a lot of time to finally be proficient, and you'd have to refer
: to the help from time to time even you're a senior engineer.
: just have a galance at the user manual, there're thousands of pages. fortuna
: tely we don't need to know everything about the software.
: and if you're gonna develop sth with it it'll be another issue which costs t
: remendous time from your schedu
f*e
6 楼
Thanks all....
y*r
7 楼
For a structural engineer, it is not used very often. Usually the company
has drafters to work on the AUTOCAD to be efficient.
has drafters to work on the AUTOCAD to be efficient.
d*n
8 楼
yes, but you'll find you have to correct their work by yourself in CAD from
time to time otherwise you'll bring your markups back and forth and
frustrated because they don't really understand what they're drawing.
【在 y*****r 的大作中提到】
: For a structural engineer, it is not used very often. Usually the company
: has drafters to work on the AUTOCAD to be efficient.
time to time otherwise you'll bring your markups back and forth and
frustrated because they don't really understand what they're drawing.
【在 y*****r 的大作中提到】
: For a structural engineer, it is not used very often. Usually the company
: has drafters to work on the AUTOCAD to be efficient.
k*k
9 楼
microstation用的更多。
不用着急，有CADD画图，你自己大概知道就可以了。
【在 f*********e 的大作中提到】
: AutoCAD对搞结构的人，工作中重要吗？我这个方面很菜的，主要是没用他做过什么大
: 的project， 所以不是很熟。
: 但对有限元三维建模很熟。赫赫
不用着急，有CADD画图，你自己大概知道就可以了。
【在 f*********e 的大作中提到】
: AutoCAD对搞结构的人，工作中重要吗？我这个方面很菜的，主要是没用他做过什么大
: 的project， 所以不是很熟。
: 但对有限元三维建模很熟。赫赫
d*n
10 楼
it depends.
AutoCAD has already become the standard,
however, a lot of public projects are demanded by the owner, say, DOT, DOE,
etc, to use the microstation.
And it always causes problems when I shift between the two.
Say, I design sth in Civil 3D and CAD, and then send them to the draftors
who will transfer them into microstation for printing. Then I mark up the
plan and the draftor modify the microstation dgn files, till now it's still
OK,
but when I try to read some data from the current dg
【在 k******k 的大作中提到】
: microstation用的更多。
: 不用着急，有CADD画图，你自己大概知道就可以了。
AutoCAD has already become the standard,
however, a lot of public projects are demanded by the owner, say, DOT, DOE,
etc, to use the microstation.
And it always causes problems when I shift between the two.
Say, I design sth in Civil 3D and CAD, and then send them to the draftors
who will transfer them into microstation for printing. Then I mark up the
plan and the draftor modify the microstation dgn files, till now it's still
OK,
but when I try to read some data from the current dg
【在 k******k 的大作中提到】
: microstation用的更多。
: 不用着急，有CADD画图，你自己大概知道就可以了。
y*o
11 楼
"AutoCAD has already become the standard "
not true.
,
still
them
【在 d*n 的大作中提到】
: it depends.
: AutoCAD has already become the standard,
: however, a lot of public projects are demanded by the owner, say, DOT, DOE,
: etc, to use the microstation.
: And it always causes problems when I shift between the two.
: Say, I design sth in Civil 3D and CAD, and then send them to the draftors
: who will transfer them into microstation for printing. Then I mark up the
: plan and the draftor modify the microstation dgn files, till now it's still
: OK,
: but when I try to read some data from the current dg
not true.
,
still
them
【在 d*n 的大作中提到】
: it depends.
: AutoCAD has already become the standard,
: however, a lot of public projects are demanded by the owner, say, DOT, DOE,
: etc, to use the microstation.
: And it always causes problems when I shift between the two.
: Say, I design sth in Civil 3D and CAD, and then send them to the draftors
: who will transfer them into microstation for printing. Then I mark up the
: plan and the draftor modify the microstation dgn files, till now it's still
: OK,
: but when I try to read some data from the current dg
相关阅读