【 以下文字转载自 Family 讨论区 】 发信人: LedZeppelin1 (铿锵金属), 信区: Family 标 题: 【爆料一个落山鸡的山东女人】前任家版阿水已婚并有娃,她F2过 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Nov 12 11:46:05 2008) 前任家版阿水已婚并有娃,她F2过来后2年与前夫离婚(其原因据说是因为阿水被几个黑人XX了,但是法律上没有立案),把娃(是纯黄的)送回国,阿水前夫一直供养该小孩。 阿水和几个黑人男友短暂同居后,很快与一个65岁的白人老头结婚,从此逢人便说自己丈夫是做时装生意的。 其实就是ebay上卖旧衣服的。。 结果那白老头酗酒,还经常打老婆,有几次据称是S&M过度,惊动了邻居和警察。隔壁的smith太太描述经常看到他们在家裸奔摔跤,窗帘也不拉上。 为此她不得不骗自己小孩,邻居是练相扑的。多次社区的有伤风化的投诉。Smith太太也因丈夫有外遇而离婚,她对此不作评价。 阿水办完身份,正在和糟老头离婚的时候,这老头不幸死于心肌梗塞,子女从中部来和啊水打官司。。。。。。 最后,啊水只身到了加州。 靠着pie版,谎报了8岁年龄,自称是
t*t
3 楼
副申请人的485被RFE, 副申请人是B1签证,要求提供过去5年的雇佣历史。 副申请人最近这两三年在美国没有工作(之前在国内有工作),但是在美国有投资一家 小商店,股份占80%,拿分红,持B1签证经常来美国停留。 在填写G-325A的时候,因为理解错误,以为只需要填写在美国的雇佣历史,所以就填写 了NONE,导致现在被RFE。 下面是RFE的具体内容: You state on your 1-485 that your current occupation is XXX; yet on your G- 325A, you state you have not been employed for the past five years. Provide a statement of your employment history for the past five years including name of employer, address of employer and dates of employment. Provide evidence that employment in the United States since November 15, 2015 as authorized. 想问问版上的各位大侠,在这种情况下,该如何回复移民局的RFE呢? 多谢各位不吝赐教~!!
t*u
4 楼
1. British Airways Visa Signature® Card – Limited Time Offer British Airways Visa Signature 信用卡限时促销: 申请就送10万飞行里程,足够兑 换2张去欧洲的往返机票。British Airways Visa Signature Card送您10万飞行里程, 让您购物一次就获赠50000里程,3个月内购物满$2500再送您50000里程。每5万British Airways里程可兑换成1张往返美国和欧洲的国际机票,10万里程就可兑换成两张往返 美国和欧洲(包括英国,法国,德国,瑞士,荷兰,比利时,爱尔兰,卢森堡)的国际机票 懒人直接点以下链接 http://goo.gl/aA4zm 2. Chase Freedom Card - $150 Bonus Cash Back + Cashback on Purchases Earn $150 Bonus Cash Back after you make $500 in purchases in your first 3 months http://goo.gl/BaTYZ 3. Chase SapphireSM Card (15K)–Best offer for 2011 Earn $150 in rewards - that's 15,000 bonus points after you spend $500 in 3 months! http://goo.gl/e6G2i 4. Chase Sapphire Preferred Card Earn 25,000 bonus points after you spend $3,000 in the first 3 months- that' s enough for a free flight http://goo.gl/q190I 最近申请chase家的这个信用卡会弹出一个页面,写着Before you go…We hope you will reconsider 难不成他们家最近被人拿太多这个免费机票了 不用对它客气, 赶紧点击Return&Apply, 拿到落袋为安。
Physical disks only need to evaluate pure random access performance (subject to disk utilization ratio, e.g. only using the first 30% of disk sectors / cylinders to reduce seek time) This is because OS and database caching have already taken care of predictable access patterns. Sequential access is usually very fast (near the interface's top speed) that it is not a major concern. If you are concerned with real world performance when used with a particular database, this actually turns the whole question into a database performance question. Because that performance is largely determined by how the OS and database arrange its storage space on the disk. To perform experiments, you would need to take a production database disk, make a sector-level copy onto the test disk, then run experiments on that test disk.