【在 x***i 的大作中提到】 : it is copy of certifate of degree and evaluation, right? : Thanks a lot
T*G
8 楼
如果是我, 我就選擇先在大公司工作, 等小公司成立好了再加入。 工作上最好不要 有GAP. Because what if you were in this "unemployment" limbo and your AOS got RFE'd for VOE? what if the 小公司根本成立不起來? 八字沒一撇, 還是謹慎 為好。 個人意見。
b*i
9 楼
是真的啊,为什么退?多少钱买的?
s*h
10 楼
i sometimes use, sometimes not
【在 G***G 的大作中提到】 : how many people link 'mordern' and 'idea' in the following sentence? : how many not? : You are full of modern ideas.
t*n
11 楼
$60 for domain 10y $22.4 for dreamhost 1y $100 for whole system and installation and modification...etc that`s all
t*r
12 楼
of course
f*n
13 楼
谢谢!
【在 T**G 的大作中提到】 : 如果是我, 我就選擇先在大公司工作, 等小公司成立好了再加入。 工作上最好不要 : 有GAP. Because what if you were in this "unemployment" limbo and your AOS : got RFE'd for VOE? what if the 小公司根本成立不起來? 八字沒一撇, 還是謹慎 : 為好。 個人意見。
P*a
14 楼
他的意思是如果觉得不好还有后路,那就是退掉..
【在 b****i 的大作中提到】 : 是真的啊,为什么退?多少钱买的?
G*G
15 楼
when is 'sometimes', and when is 'othertimes'?
【在 s*****h 的大作中提到】 : i sometimes use, sometimes not
I'm still not sure what this linking is... Is it just the natural flow of the conversation, or some way of speaking that slurs words together? Cuz I'd just say modern ideas as it is written: modern, followed by ideas.
linking is a natural phonetic phonomenon. If you speak fast and continuously... you would do that automatically... If you speak slowly, don't do that -- it would sound very strange...
【在 G***G 的大作中提到】 : how many people link 'mordern' and 'idea' in the following sentence? : how many not? : You are full of modern ideas.
I guess I'm mostly just confused about why one would want to actively "link" just certain words in a sentence. I think that as long as you have concise articulation, it is of more value than able to "link" words together. For non-natives it's more important to speak clearly and deliberately.
every chinese told me 'if you speak fastly, you can connect them automatically'. but the truth is a chinese who lived in u.s. for ten years can only speak english 'word by word' when he speaks fastly. I found that most of chinese did the same. they couldn't link words NOT because they couldn't speak fastly, just because they didn't know to link them. They don't know where to pause, where two words should be linked together, where not.
【在 l***i 的大作中提到】 : linking is a natural phonetic phonomenon. : If you speak fast and continuously... you would do that automatically... : If you speak slowly, don't do that -- it would sound very strange...
m*d
31 楼
着我就没发言权了,哈哈。找时间问问他们。
【在 s******v 的大作中提到】 : 就是看他的股票跌的很惨,想看看他咋样,能不嫩投机一把。
T*o
32 楼
原光的好看
【在 w***o 的大作中提到】 : 虽然标了个64 : 可怎么看着一点美感也无有
G*G
33 楼
you are right. today I found that it is nearly impossible for us to "link" words as an american does.
link" to
【在 Y**s 的大作中提到】 : I guess I'm mostly just confused about why one would want to actively "link" : just certain words in a sentence. : I think that as long as you have concise articulation, it is of more value : than able to "link" words together. For non-natives it's more important to : speak clearly and deliberately.
this is a problem which confuses me too. you are sure you will link 'it' and 'is'. you may link them as it's or link them as i__tis no one says 'it is' the question I am confused about is when and where not to link two words(first with ending of consonent, second with begining of vowel ) I don't link modern and idea too. but I find some people don't link them when they speak fastly and others link them when speaking slowly.
.
【在 Y**s 的大作中提到】 : I'm still not sure what this linking is... Is it just the natural flow of : the conversation, or some way of speaking that slurs words together? : Cuz I'd just say modern ideas as it is written: modern, followed by ideas.
Keep in mind that the majority of Americans aren't good speakers - just like the majority of Chinese aren't good speakers. So I wouldn't really bother with trying to speak like a typical American. On the other hand if you watch national news broadcasts, the news anchors mostly speak with a very neutral intonation and they are very articulate. They say "it is" as it is written - not slurring the 2 words together. I think in order for one to speak naturally, the most important thing is to be ab
【在 G***G 的大作中提到】 : this is a problem which confuses me too. : you are sure you will link 'it' and 'is'. : you may link them as it's : or link them as i__tis : no one says 'it is' : the question I am confused about is when and where not to : link two words(first with ending of consonent, second with begining of vowel : ) : I don't link modern and idea too. but I find some people don't : link them when they speak fastly and others link them when speaking slowly.
Like rapid-fire staccato? ... Sounds like Singaporean English...
【在 G***G 的大作中提到】 : this is a problem which confuses me too. : you are sure you will link 'it' and 'is'. : you may link them as it's : or link them as i__tis : no one says 'it is' : the question I am confused about is when and where not to : link two words(first with ending of consonent, second with begining of vowel : ) : I don't link modern and idea too. but I find some people don't : link them when they speak fastly and others link them when speaking slowly.
a*k
43 楼
Does anybody know any Chinese companies in L4-L7 load balancer or Wan optimization sector?