avatar
z*r
3
为什么好像这些大公司都没有什么特别好的provisioning system,随着services越来越
unified,俺觉得一套好的provisioning system真是带来太多好除了

【在 l***y 的大作中提到】
: http://www.networkworld.com/nlnetflash14206
avatar
z*r
4
why?

【在 h****e 的大作中提到】
: IBM sucks.
avatar
h*e
5
don't know how promising service is.

,
the

【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: why?
avatar
z*r
6
I think they know what they are doing and what they are going to do, that is,
they do everything about services. During the bubble years, IBM is one of the
few companies who still were doing well

【在 h****e 的大作中提到】
: don't know how promising service is.
:
: ,
: the

avatar
l*y
8
r u ISP? juniper has a thingy called SDX



【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: 为什么好像这些大公司都没有什么特别好的provisioning system,随着services越来越
: unified,俺觉得一套好的provisioning system真是带来太多好除了

avatar
c*a
9
have you used that, just installed that, seems to be very powerful,
but junoscope is probably sufficient for most basic functions
good thing about SDX is to cover both backbone and edge networking gears

【在 l***y 的大作中提到】
: r u ISP? juniper has a thingy called SDX
:
: 越

avatar
l*y
10
i think big companies have inherit drag. the decision making process is
unthinkable and by who-should-better-not-be-named; the bug-fixing and
feature enhancement process will take forever, if ever. smaller companies
are more agile.
it's a shame most small companies are founded with the goal of being bought
by big guys.

of

【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: I think they know what they are doing and what they are going to do, that is,
: they do everything about services. During the bubble years, IBM is one of the
: few companies who still were doing well

avatar
z*r
11
为什么好像这些大公司都没有什么特别好的provisioning system,随着services越来越
unified,俺觉得一套好的provisioning system真是带来太多好除了

【在 l***y 的大作中提到】
: http://www.networkworld.com/nlnetflash14206
avatar
z*r
12
why?

【在 h****e 的大作中提到】
: IBM sucks.
avatar
l*y
13
i don't care if they want to make money.
but in this form even v. good companies have life cycle:
either start -> success -> buy more -> collapse -> close shop or be bought
or start ->success -> be bought
makes us customers v. tired in keeping up with the changes.
hoho

【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: why?
avatar
z*r
14
I think they know what they are doing and what they are going to do, that is,
they do everything about services. During the bubble years, IBM is one of the
few companies who still were doing well

【在 h****e 的大作中提到】
: IBM sucks.
avatar
l*y
15
pardon me, but it sucks.
i.e. qos is not to be configured within the app, firewall rules
are configurable but limited(not flexible enough). and it's a
frankenstein stapled together by ldap, radius, and some other apps.
recent upgrade has better web front end, but that's it.
however, it's made for ISPs, whose network doesn't have the
complexity we have. i know they have some big ISP customers.
(hope i'll not be sued by juniper. :P )

【在 c*a 的大作中提到】
: have you used that, just installed that, seems to be very powerful,
: but junoscope is probably sufficient for most basic functions
: good thing about SDX is to cover both backbone and edge networking gears

avatar
z*r
16
hehe, ppl make business for money, .....

【在 l***y 的大作中提到】
: i think big companies have inherit drag. the decision making process is
: unthinkable and by who-should-better-not-be-named; the bug-fixing and
: feature enhancement process will take forever, if ever. smaller companies
: are more agile.
: it's a shame most small companies are founded with the goal of being bought
: by big guys.
:
: of

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。