ME专业，与律师有分歧，诚恳请教各位版友# Immigration - 落地生根
L*5
1 楼
我是ME专业，有几点请教各位牛人前辈
总体引用138，有个领域内的奖项，但是不是那种惊天动地的大奖，律师觉得值得一吹
，把award一项claim了。下面是PL最后总结部分，恳请各位能给些建议，我觉得风险很
大，可是律师觉得就应该所谓6个都claim
As presented above, Dr. xxx has provided threshold evidence for six
categories of evidence listed in 8 CFR §§204.5(h)(3) and (4), namely: 1)
his receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards for
excellence in the field of endeavor; 2) published material about his
research in trade publications; 3) evidence of his participation as a judge
of the work of others in the same or related fields; 4) evidence of his
original scientific contributions of major significance to the field; 5)
authorship of scholarly articles in leading journals in the field; and 6)
presentation of his work at major national and international conferences.
Therefore, by presenting threshold evidence of at least three criteria in 8
CFR §§204.5(h)(3) and (4), he has fulfilled the first requirement of the
Kazarian formulation.
第二个问题是，我们传统专业引用真的比较少，希望能比较 “Top Research
Universities Faculty Scholarly Productivity” 可是原文链接失效了，不知道哪位
前辈能够给我提供一下,或者还有没有其他方式比较，非常感谢！ [email protected]/* */
com
总体引用138，有个领域内的奖项，但是不是那种惊天动地的大奖，律师觉得值得一吹
，把award一项claim了。下面是PL最后总结部分，恳请各位能给些建议，我觉得风险很
大，可是律师觉得就应该所谓6个都claim
As presented above, Dr. xxx has provided threshold evidence for six
categories of evidence listed in 8 CFR §§204.5(h)(3) and (4), namely: 1)
his receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards for
excellence in the field of endeavor; 2) published material about his
research in trade publications; 3) evidence of his participation as a judge
of the work of others in the same or related fields; 4) evidence of his
original scientific contributions of major significance to the field; 5)
authorship of scholarly articles in leading journals in the field; and 6)
presentation of his work at major national and international conferences.
Therefore, by presenting threshold evidence of at least three criteria in 8
CFR §§204.5(h)(3) and (4), he has fulfilled the first requirement of the
Kazarian formulation.
第二个问题是，我们传统专业引用真的比较少，希望能比较 “Top Research
Universities Faculty Scholarly Productivity” 可是原文链接失效了，不知道哪位
前辈能够给我提供一下,或者还有没有其他方式比较，非常感谢！ [email protected]/* */
com
