in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-l3vpn-2547-mvpn-00#page-10 it says Option A: VRF-to-VRF connections at the AS border routers. Option B: EBGP redistribution of labeled VPN-IP routes from AS to neighboring AS. Option C: Multihop EBGP distribution of labeled VPN-IP routes between source and destination ASes, with EBGP redistribution of labeled IP routes from AS to neighboring AS. but in many other document, I see Back to Back VRF connections (Option A) VPNv4 routes di
well I over looked the option C statement in the draft. it does say "labeled IP routes" from AS to neighboring AS, that means IPv4 and labels are distributed between the ASBRs. so the more clear way to describe option A B C should be, option A: VRF-to-VRF connections at the ASBRs option B: VPNv4 distribution is done at the ASBRs by directed connected eBGP option 1: next-hop-self option 2: redistribute connected option C: VPNv4 distribution is done at the RRs in each AS, and IPv4+
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】 : in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-l3vpn-2547-mvpn-00#page-10 : it says : Option A: VRF-to-VRF connections at the AS border routers. : Option B: EBGP redistribution of labeled VPN-IP routes from AS to : neighboring AS. : Option C: Multihop EBGP distribution of labeled VPN-IP routes between : source and destination ASes, with EBGP redistribution of labeled IP : routes from AS to neighboring AS. : but in many other document, I see : Back to Back VRF connections (Option A)
c*a
8 楼
印象中这个已经是RFC了,怎么还是MVPN的ID
labeled eBGP labels
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】 : well I over looked the option C statement in the draft. it does say "labeled : IP routes" from AS to neighboring AS, that means IPv4 and labels are : distributed between the ASBRs. : so the more clear way to describe option A B C should be, : option A: VRF-to-VRF connections at the ASBRs : option B: VPNv4 distribution is done at the ASBRs by directed connected eBGP : option 1: next-hop-self : option 2: redistribute connected : option C: VPNv4 distribution is done at the RRs in each AS, and IPv4+