avatar
可以抄底小留了!# Joke - 肚皮舞运动
k*8
1
所以说一定要有独立判断,不要轻信任何"大牛"
http://money.cnn.com/2011/08/30/markets/bondcenter/bonds_pimco_
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Investors have been pouring their money into U.S.
Treasuries all year, much to the consternation of bond guru Bill Gross, who
had been advocating for investors to dump out of government debt because of
their low yields.
Gross, who manages the world's biggest bond fund, is now admitting that he
struck out.
Print
Pimco's Total Return Fund (PTTRX), which has $245 billion in assets under
management, slashed its exposure to U.S. government debt to zero in February
, betting that U.S. Treasury prices would fall and yields would spike.
That didn't happen.
The 10-year yield stood at a lofty 3.75% in February. Less than two weeks
ago, the yield on the 10-year note touched a record low below 2%, and it now
stands at 2.17%.
Even as recently as June, when the 10-year yield had drifted down to 3%,
Gross was still badmouthing bonds. He even went so far as to liken Treasury
investors to frogs getting cooked alive in slow boiling pot of water,
unaware of the consequences. He was confident that the Federal Reserve's
conclusion of QE2, its bond buying program, would push yields even higher.
But now that yields have dropped as low as they have, Gross has changed his
tune.
Is yield curve signaling a recession?
He told the Wall Street Journal that he has "lost sleep" over his bet, and
called it a "mistake."
In a separate interview with the Financial Times, Gross was just as humble.
"Do I wish I had more Treasuries? Yeah, that's pretty obvious," he said to
the London-based newspaper. "I get that it was my/our mistake in thinking
that the U.S. economy can chug along at 2% real growth rates. It doesn't
look like it can."
Thanks to Pimco's wrong-way bet, the once leading bond fund is up just 1%
this year, trailing the returns of a whopping 84% of its peers funds,
according to Morningstar data.
0:00 / 4:22 PIMCO's Gross: Recession inevitable
Much of the slide in U.S. Treasury yields came after a nasty debt-ceiling
debate and Standard & Poor's credit rating downgrade. Than panic selling
picked up as investors looked to U.S. debt for safety, amid growing fears
that the U.S. economy could dip back into a recession.
Investors were also encouraged to stick with Treasuries after the Fed
pledged to keep interest rates near record lows for another two years.
The changing dynamics and circumstances have pushed Gross to reconsider
Pimco's grim outlook for U.S. Treasuries, and in recent months, he has
started to buy government debt.
He told the Financial Times that the firm has "moderated" its bearish
position, noting that the economies of the United States and other developed
countries are the crossroads of a recession. But Gross noted that Pimco
still does not own "tons of Treasuries."
And over the long term, Gross maintains his argument that government will
spur higher inflation to reduce the value of their debt.
Gross was unavailable for immediate comment.
avatar
b*1
2
本人搞硬件的,但也常要编点程序,汇编/C/Java都有,用得最多的则是傻瓜型的
matlab和R—这样精力就可以集中于数据处理了。
编程和下棋都考验大脑的短期记忆以及分析能力,颇有类同。我就试着对比一下吧。
下棋只能想1-2步的人,严格说来根本不适合编程。但有些编程语言通俗易懂,加上结
构化设计也比较直白,这种人还是可以码十来行代码的。他们一般也就是编着玩玩,或
是写论文赶鸭子上架,但不排除一些人以此为生—很多搞SAS编程的人就属这类。这种
水平的人干编程,在国内拼不过竞争,基本绝迹了;但美国大企业的铁饭碗结实,不难
遇到这种人。团队里摊上一个,TA啥都不干往往就是对团队最大的贡献。
下棋能想3-4步的人是编程的中坚力量,亚欧美洲都一样。他们能够处理比较复杂的嵌
套和调用,练熟手后,就胜任绝大部分编程工作了。这类人的高下之分主要体现在效率
上,牛人分分钟搞定,低手几周后才恍然大悟;但他们间没有爬不过的槛。
下棋能想5+步的人,进则业界大佬,退也足以在团队里称雄。复杂软件的架构,缺了这
种人就玩不转,属不可替代资源。有这智商人的比例,哪儿估计都差不多。但脑力发展
依赖环境激发。美国大学编程老师,很多都是有开创性贡献的;相比之下,国内大学的
编程老师多是美国同行的徒子徒孙,部分人甚至一辈子都没写过多少代码,纯以教书为
生。美国搞软件赚钱,比做硬件多得海去了;国内则软件不值钱,往往卖硬件时白送,
偶尔有个不错的软件则盗版一拥而上把人吓跑。天,地,人环境如斯。雪上加霜的是,
国内好不容易出了些不错的编程杰才,相当一部分还溜到了美国。比高端软件人才,国
内是完败。但愿以后的产业回流能消减这种差异。
avatar
w*g
3
川老最新指示,从今以后只发婚姻绿卡!黑皮护照琐男喜大普奔。
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 16
avatar
s*x
4
树叶有专攻, 没有什么可比性。
“复杂软件的架构,缺了这种人就玩不转,属不可替代资源”
我觉得根本没这种人存在, 编程基本是体力劳动了, 那些牛人不是牛在编程, 而是
某一领域的专门知识。 就是所谓的砖家。
编程水平当然也分三六九等, 这个就是个熟练程度而已。
这也是大多数公司面试时根本不考你的编程能力, 而着重算法的原因了。
计算机界, 我觉得基本分三类, 知道要做什么, 知道怎么做, 人家让做什么就做什
么。
真正厉害的是知道要做什么的, 知道怎么做的是中间力量, 剩下的是打酱油的。
avatar
b*e
5
是要效仿北美国搞打分移民吗

【在 w*****g 的大作中提到】
: 川老最新指示,从今以后只发婚姻绿卡!黑皮护照琐男喜大普奔。
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 16

avatar
v*a
6
早年对编程稍有接触,感觉和手工织毛线花样差不多,一般大妈都能上手。
avatar
w*g
7
Yes!

★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 16

【在 b*****e 的大作中提到】
: 是要效仿北美国搞打分移民吗
avatar
b*1
8
"真正厉害的是知道要做什么的, 知道怎么做的是中间力量, 剩下的是打酱油的。"
这个观点我一定程度上赞同,但我更赞同的是,很多时候成功与否,不在于是否有想法
,而在于有否执行力。有iphone想法的人成百上千,但只有一个Jobs。
我再举个例子吧。
假设某家电信公司想推出云终端减免话费的服务:手机用户用手机的空闲CPU帮电信公
司做云计算,话费减免,电信公司另向有云计算需求的公司收取费用。
能搞定整套软件系统架构的人多不多?
avatar
b*e
9
小刘在秀水买个文凭还不容易么

【在 w*****g 的大作中提到】
: Yes!
:
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 16

avatar
n*q
10
下棋能想 > 10步. 现管公司最复杂软件. 但是底pay.
所以想跳,又没地方跳,愈闷。

【在 b*******1 的大作中提到】
: 本人搞硬件的,但也常要编点程序,汇编/C/Java都有,用得最多的则是傻瓜型的
: matlab和R—这样精力就可以集中于数据处理了。
: 编程和下棋都考验大脑的短期记忆以及分析能力,颇有类同。我就试着对比一下吧。
: 下棋只能想1-2步的人,严格说来根本不适合编程。但有些编程语言通俗易懂,加上结
: 构化设计也比较直白,这种人还是可以码十来行代码的。他们一般也就是编着玩玩,或
: 是写论文赶鸭子上架,但不排除一些人以此为生—很多搞SAS编程的人就属这类。这种
: 水平的人干编程,在国内拼不过竞争,基本绝迹了;但美国大企业的铁饭碗结实,不难
: 遇到这种人。团队里摊上一个,TA啥都不干往往就是对团队最大的贡献。
: 下棋能想3-4步的人是编程的中坚力量,亚欧美洲都一样。他们能够处理比较复杂的嵌
: 套和调用,练熟手后,就胜任绝大部分编程工作了。这类人的高下之分主要体现在效率

avatar
g*e
11
编程最重要的是记性要好,啥变量名字,调用层次都要记得住,这要处理问题的时候会
省很多时间。但码农这个工作本身就是摧残记忆力的。
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。