狮子：勇士队是橄榄之爱国者，滚乐之甲壳虫。 (转载)# Joke - 肚皮舞运动
n*4
1 楼
【 以下文字转载自 Basketball 讨论区 】
发信人: ne5234 (Nessun Dorma), 信区: Basketball
标 题: 狮子：勇士队是橄榄之爱国者，滚乐之甲壳虫。
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Jun 8 14:42:59 2018, 美东)
"It's almost like playing the Patriots," James said. "You can't have
mistakes. They're not going to beat themselves. You know, so when you're
able to either force a miscue on them, you have to be able to capitalize and
you have to be so in tuned and razor sharp and focused every single
possession."
James' comparison makes sense on a few levels. The Patriots won three Super
Bowl in five years from 2002-05 and nearly won a third in four years before
losing to the Eagles in Super Bowl 52. From a schematic standpoint, you have
to bring you're A-plus game to have a chance, and as these NBA Finals have
proven, sometimes that's still not enough.
The Warriors are unfair — in both a bad and good way. Durant, Curry,
Thompson and Draymond Green have formed a core that continues to dominate
the NBA with flair. Green was asked to describe how it feels on the winning
side.
"Fun," Green said. "Very fun. It allows all of us to play to our strengths,
which is great."
Yes, the Warriors can still be great for the league, too. It's good to have
a polarizing championship team. Some only see Golden State through the lens
of sustained dominance, set to become the 13th team to win back-to-back
championships with a chance to join the illustrious three-peat-or-more-club
that includes the Minneapolis Lakers (1952-54), Boston Celtics (1959-66),
Chicago Bulls (1991-93, 1996-98) and Los Angeles Lakers (2000-02). Ratings
will go up if the Warriors are in that position next season.
James might compare the Warriors to the Patriots, but some have compared the
franchise to The Beatles.
Only the Warriors now feel like The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, The Clash
and The Doors on one stage. It's a ticket you can't beat — even if you have
the greatest solo artist in this generation in James.
发信人: ne5234 (Nessun Dorma), 信区: Basketball
标 题: 狮子：勇士队是橄榄之爱国者，滚乐之甲壳虫。
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Jun 8 14:42:59 2018, 美东)
"It's almost like playing the Patriots," James said. "You can't have
mistakes. They're not going to beat themselves. You know, so when you're
able to either force a miscue on them, you have to be able to capitalize and
you have to be so in tuned and razor sharp and focused every single
possession."
James' comparison makes sense on a few levels. The Patriots won three Super
Bowl in five years from 2002-05 and nearly won a third in four years before
losing to the Eagles in Super Bowl 52. From a schematic standpoint, you have
to bring you're A-plus game to have a chance, and as these NBA Finals have
proven, sometimes that's still not enough.
The Warriors are unfair — in both a bad and good way. Durant, Curry,
Thompson and Draymond Green have formed a core that continues to dominate
the NBA with flair. Green was asked to describe how it feels on the winning
side.
"Fun," Green said. "Very fun. It allows all of us to play to our strengths,
which is great."
Yes, the Warriors can still be great for the league, too. It's good to have
a polarizing championship team. Some only see Golden State through the lens
of sustained dominance, set to become the 13th team to win back-to-back
championships with a chance to join the illustrious three-peat-or-more-club
that includes the Minneapolis Lakers (1952-54), Boston Celtics (1959-66),
Chicago Bulls (1991-93, 1996-98) and Los Angeles Lakers (2000-02). Ratings
will go up if the Warriors are in that position next season.
James might compare the Warriors to the Patriots, but some have compared the
franchise to The Beatles.
Only the Warriors now feel like The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, The Clash
and The Doors on one stage. It's a ticket you can't beat — even if you have
the greatest solo artist in this generation in James.