[bssd] 三岁的boy potty training# Parenting - 为人父母
w*i
1 楼
Title: So Many Research Scientists, So Few Openings as Professors
By Gina Kolata
The United States is producing more research scientists than academia can
handle.
We have been told time and again that the United States needs more
scientists, but when it comes to some of the most desirable science jobs —
tenure-track professorships at universities, where much of the exciting work
is done — there is such a surplus of Ph.D.s that in the most popular
fields, like biomedicine, fewer than one in six has a chance of joining the
club in the foreseeable future.
While they try to get a foot in the door, many spend years after getting
their Ph.D. as poorly paid foot soldiers in a system that can afford to
exploit them. Even someone as brilliant as Emmanuelle Charpentier, who in
2015 became head of the Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology after a
momentous discovery in gene editing, spent the previous 25 years moving
through nine institutions in five countries.
The lure of a tenured job in academia is great — it means a secure,
prestigious position directing a lab that does cutting-edge experiments,
often carried out by underlings. Yet although many yearn for such jobs,
fewer than half of those who earn science or engineering doctorates end up
in the sort of academic positions that directly use what they were trained
for.
Others, ending up in industry, business or other professions, do interesting
work and earn lucrative salaries and can contribute enormously to society.
But by the time many give up on academia — four to six years or more for a
Ph.D., a decade or more as a postdoc, they are edging toward middle age,
having spent their youth in temporary low-paying positions getting highly
specialized training they do not need.
Now, as a new crop of graduate students receives Ph.D.s in science,
researchers worry over the future of some of these dedicated people; they’
re trained to be academics and are often led to believe that anything else
is an admission of failure.
Every year the market grows tighter, and federal money for research grants,
which support most of this research, remains flat. The journey of Dr.
Charpentier, says Alexander Ommaya, acting chief scientific officer at the
Association of American Medical Colleges, is not so unusual. “It happens,”
he said. Job opportunities, he says, “are limited.”
But wait. Don’t we need more trained scientists — the people whose
research can lead to new knowledge, new products, new cures for disease?
Aren’t some companies importing STEM workers?
Continue reading the main story
It depends on which field: biology (many more Ph.D.s than academic posts);
chemistry (same); computer science (few academic posts, but so much demand
in industry that companies import talent).
And it depends on which degree — bachelor’s, master’s, Ph.D. The toughest
road is the one stretching out in front of people with newly minted
doctorates.
The engineering school at M.I.T., for example, often gets 400 applicants for
every open assistant professor job, says Richard Larson, an operations
research professor there. Many, he adds, are “superstellar.”
One way to see what is happening is to look at a measure, called R0, used in
demography to show how a population is growing. If every baby girl in a
population grows up to have one baby girl on average, R0 is one, and the
population size will remain constant. If R0 is significantly greater than
one, the population can explode.
Dr. Larson and his colleagues calculated R0s for various science fields in
academia. There, R0 is the average number of Ph.D.s that a tenure-track
professor will graduate over the course of his or her career, with an R0 of
one meaning each professor is replaced by one new Ph.D. The highest R0 is in
environmental engineering, at 19.0. It is lower — 6.3 — in biological and
medical sciences combined, but that still means that for every new Ph.D.
who gets a tenure-track academic job, 5.3 will be shut out. In other words,
Dr. Larson said, 84 percent of new Ph.D.s in biomedicine “should be
pursuing other opportunities” — jobs in industry or elsewhere, for example
, that are not meant to lead to a professorship.
Biomedical sciences have been among the hardest hit. The field had an 83
percent increase in Ph.D.s between 1993 and 2013, to about 192,000 from 105,
000. But although most got jobs somewhere, only about half got jobs in
academia and only a quarter got tenure-track positions, which, for many, is
what all that training was preparing them for.
“It used to be that the majority who got a Ph.D. in the biological sciences
would go into an academic career,” said Dr. Michael Lauer, deputy director
for extramural research at the National Institutes of Health. “Now,” he
says, “that is very much the minority.”
Many spend years in a holding pattern as postdocs, which are temporary
positions, working for a professor and being paid from the professor’s
research grant. The average pay in 2016 for a beginning postdoc in the
biomedical sciences is around $44,000, a figure that, adjusted for inflation
, has not changed since 1998.
Why would any smart person work for so little? The goal for postdocs is to
get grants of their own eventually, but the success rate for those applying
has plunged.
In 2000, 32 percent of grant applications to the National Institutes of
Health resulted in an award. Now it is just 18 percent. And the average age
at which the lucky few actually get a grant has steadily increased — it is
now 42, up from 35 in 1980, which means biomedical scientists in academia
are essentially apprentices until middle age. And the tendency is for the
grants to go to scientists who already have them, making it harder and
harder to break into the system.
The National Institutes of Health recently created a grant specifically for
beginning scientists, but only about 20 percent of applications result in an
award. Most beginning scientists face five or more years as a postdoc,
which is not always conducive to original research.
“The incentive for the professor is to have the postdoc do as much work as
possible so the professor can get grants,” said Gary McDowell, executive
director of a newly formed group, The Future of Research, that supports
young scientists. “I have heard of postdocs going to orientation when a
faculty member said: ‘This is not a time to work on your independence. It
is a time for you to work for your professor to help him succeed.’”
Postdocs, he added, “are very much a form of cheap labor.” But young
scientists vie for the positions.
“People are desperate to work, desperate to get academic jobs,” said Dr.
McDowell, who had two postdoctoral positions before accepting his current
job.
At the same time, the number of tenure-track academic jobs is shrinking.
Some places, like M.I.T., have resisted the trend; it has had a steady
number of tenured faculty — 1,000 — for at least 30 years. But with more
people vying for those jobs when they open up and faculty members retiring
later and later, competition is fierce.
But some colleges — like the Boston University School of Medicine and
Morehouse School of Medicine — do not even offer tenure-track positions.
For those thinking of science as a career, said P. Kay Lund, director of the
division of biomedical research workers at the National Institutes of
Health, perhaps the best thing would be for a mentor to sit down with them
and have a heart-to-heart talk, preferably when they’re still
undergraduates.
“A lot of the time, there is not a lot of thought about it,” Dr. Lund said
. “People say, ‘I love science; I am great at it. I will get a Ph.D.’”
Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/14/upshot/so-many-research-scientists-so-few-openings-as-professors.html
Recent Comments
Spike Johan 16 minutes ago
Great article - thanks, but I believe that it left out a single key point
concerning the potential future for those pursuing PhD's in the...
Gabriel maldonado 53 minutes ago
Come to teaching where your technical skills and deep knowledge of your
subjects are desperately needed, and where instead of milling away...
Marilynn Donahue 1 hour ago
Thank you, Gina Kolata, for such a straightforward article. These are the
cold hard facts about life after a PhD. As an instructor in a...
By Gina Kolata
The United States is producing more research scientists than academia can
handle.
We have been told time and again that the United States needs more
scientists, but when it comes to some of the most desirable science jobs —
tenure-track professorships at universities, where much of the exciting work
is done — there is such a surplus of Ph.D.s that in the most popular
fields, like biomedicine, fewer than one in six has a chance of joining the
club in the foreseeable future.
While they try to get a foot in the door, many spend years after getting
their Ph.D. as poorly paid foot soldiers in a system that can afford to
exploit them. Even someone as brilliant as Emmanuelle Charpentier, who in
2015 became head of the Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology after a
momentous discovery in gene editing, spent the previous 25 years moving
through nine institutions in five countries.
The lure of a tenured job in academia is great — it means a secure,
prestigious position directing a lab that does cutting-edge experiments,
often carried out by underlings. Yet although many yearn for such jobs,
fewer than half of those who earn science or engineering doctorates end up
in the sort of academic positions that directly use what they were trained
for.
Others, ending up in industry, business or other professions, do interesting
work and earn lucrative salaries and can contribute enormously to society.
But by the time many give up on academia — four to six years or more for a
Ph.D., a decade or more as a postdoc, they are edging toward middle age,
having spent their youth in temporary low-paying positions getting highly
specialized training they do not need.
Now, as a new crop of graduate students receives Ph.D.s in science,
researchers worry over the future of some of these dedicated people; they’
re trained to be academics and are often led to believe that anything else
is an admission of failure.
Every year the market grows tighter, and federal money for research grants,
which support most of this research, remains flat. The journey of Dr.
Charpentier, says Alexander Ommaya, acting chief scientific officer at the
Association of American Medical Colleges, is not so unusual. “It happens,”
he said. Job opportunities, he says, “are limited.”
But wait. Don’t we need more trained scientists — the people whose
research can lead to new knowledge, new products, new cures for disease?
Aren’t some companies importing STEM workers?
Continue reading the main story
It depends on which field: biology (many more Ph.D.s than academic posts);
chemistry (same); computer science (few academic posts, but so much demand
in industry that companies import talent).
And it depends on which degree — bachelor’s, master’s, Ph.D. The toughest
road is the one stretching out in front of people with newly minted
doctorates.
The engineering school at M.I.T., for example, often gets 400 applicants for
every open assistant professor job, says Richard Larson, an operations
research professor there. Many, he adds, are “superstellar.”
One way to see what is happening is to look at a measure, called R0, used in
demography to show how a population is growing. If every baby girl in a
population grows up to have one baby girl on average, R0 is one, and the
population size will remain constant. If R0 is significantly greater than
one, the population can explode.
Dr. Larson and his colleagues calculated R0s for various science fields in
academia. There, R0 is the average number of Ph.D.s that a tenure-track
professor will graduate over the course of his or her career, with an R0 of
one meaning each professor is replaced by one new Ph.D. The highest R0 is in
environmental engineering, at 19.0. It is lower — 6.3 — in biological and
medical sciences combined, but that still means that for every new Ph.D.
who gets a tenure-track academic job, 5.3 will be shut out. In other words,
Dr. Larson said, 84 percent of new Ph.D.s in biomedicine “should be
pursuing other opportunities” — jobs in industry or elsewhere, for example
, that are not meant to lead to a professorship.
Biomedical sciences have been among the hardest hit. The field had an 83
percent increase in Ph.D.s between 1993 and 2013, to about 192,000 from 105,
000. But although most got jobs somewhere, only about half got jobs in
academia and only a quarter got tenure-track positions, which, for many, is
what all that training was preparing them for.
“It used to be that the majority who got a Ph.D. in the biological sciences
would go into an academic career,” said Dr. Michael Lauer, deputy director
for extramural research at the National Institutes of Health. “Now,” he
says, “that is very much the minority.”
Many spend years in a holding pattern as postdocs, which are temporary
positions, working for a professor and being paid from the professor’s
research grant. The average pay in 2016 for a beginning postdoc in the
biomedical sciences is around $44,000, a figure that, adjusted for inflation
, has not changed since 1998.
Why would any smart person work for so little? The goal for postdocs is to
get grants of their own eventually, but the success rate for those applying
has plunged.
In 2000, 32 percent of grant applications to the National Institutes of
Health resulted in an award. Now it is just 18 percent. And the average age
at which the lucky few actually get a grant has steadily increased — it is
now 42, up from 35 in 1980, which means biomedical scientists in academia
are essentially apprentices until middle age. And the tendency is for the
grants to go to scientists who already have them, making it harder and
harder to break into the system.
The National Institutes of Health recently created a grant specifically for
beginning scientists, but only about 20 percent of applications result in an
award. Most beginning scientists face five or more years as a postdoc,
which is not always conducive to original research.
“The incentive for the professor is to have the postdoc do as much work as
possible so the professor can get grants,” said Gary McDowell, executive
director of a newly formed group, The Future of Research, that supports
young scientists. “I have heard of postdocs going to orientation when a
faculty member said: ‘This is not a time to work on your independence. It
is a time for you to work for your professor to help him succeed.’”
Postdocs, he added, “are very much a form of cheap labor.” But young
scientists vie for the positions.
“People are desperate to work, desperate to get academic jobs,” said Dr.
McDowell, who had two postdoctoral positions before accepting his current
job.
At the same time, the number of tenure-track academic jobs is shrinking.
Some places, like M.I.T., have resisted the trend; it has had a steady
number of tenured faculty — 1,000 — for at least 30 years. But with more
people vying for those jobs when they open up and faculty members retiring
later and later, competition is fierce.
But some colleges — like the Boston University School of Medicine and
Morehouse School of Medicine — do not even offer tenure-track positions.
For those thinking of science as a career, said P. Kay Lund, director of the
division of biomedical research workers at the National Institutes of
Health, perhaps the best thing would be for a mentor to sit down with them
and have a heart-to-heart talk, preferably when they’re still
undergraduates.
“A lot of the time, there is not a lot of thought about it,” Dr. Lund said
. “People say, ‘I love science; I am great at it. I will get a Ph.D.’”
Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/14/upshot/so-many-research-scientists-so-few-openings-as-professors.html
Recent Comments
Spike Johan 16 minutes ago
Great article - thanks, but I believe that it left out a single key point
concerning the potential future for those pursuing PhD's in the...
Gabriel maldonado 53 minutes ago
Come to teaching where your technical skills and deep knowledge of your
subjects are desperately needed, and where instead of milling away...
Marilynn Donahue 1 hour ago
Thank you, Gina Kolata, for such a straightforward article. These are the
cold hard facts about life after a PhD. As an instructor in a...
