来了，来了，24-120/4 PK 28-300 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>PhotoGear - 摄影器材

来了，来了，24-120/4 PK 28-300

来了，来了，24-120/4 PK 28-300# PhotoGear - 摄影器材

Q*n2010-11-12 08:11

1 楼

从超市拿的，还有7张。Purchase需要在6月30日前完成，7月14日之前的postmark就可
以了。
要的XDJM paypal给我$0.5的邮费就可以了。

G*Y2010-11-12 08:11

2 楼

这下high了
http://nikonrumors.com/2010/10/24/nikon-24-120mm-f4g-ed-vr-vs-nikon-28-300mm-f3-5-5-6-ed-vr.aspx

L*h2010-11-12 08:11

3 楼

具体要求是什么？能说说吗？

【在 Q*****n 的大作中提到】

: 从超市拿的，还有7张。Purchase需要在6月30日前完成，7月14日之前的postmark就可
: 以了。
: 要的XDJM paypal给我$0.5的邮费就可以了。

h*s2010-11-12 08:11

4 楼

沙发

x*i2010-11-12 08:11

5 楼

买crest的东西算吗，如果算的话，我排一张

G*Y2010-11-12 08:11

6 楼

锐度摘要：
Based on those test chart images, I would say that at 28mm both lenses
perform almost identical (the 24-120 is slightly sharper).
At 50mm focal length and f/4.5 aperture I think the 24-120 performs slightly
better than the 28-300mm lens. At aperture f/5.6 I could not see any
differences between both lenses.
At 120mm f/5.6 I could not see a difference in the test charts of both
lenses. Just a note: the 28-300 test shots were actually done at 122mm, I
couldn’t fine tune the zoom to be exactly 120mm.
。。。
握着28-300我蛋很定呀。。。
Conclusion
If I have to pick one of those two lenses, I would definitely go for the
Nikon 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 ED VR. The Nikon 24-120mm f/4G ED VR will probably
deliver slightly better results, but as you saw from all the comparisons,
the difference in real life pictures is not significant. The longer zoom of
the 28-300 lens is much more useful for a “general walk around lens” and
the 4mm difference on the wide angle side is almost not noticeable in the
pictures. Did I mention that the 28-300mm lens is also cheaper by almost $
300?. The 240-120mm focal range overlaps with several other popular lenses
in the Nikon’s catalog (16-35mm, 24-70mm, 70-200mm) and if you own some of
them already, the 28-300mm will make more sense. I can also imagine that
those two lenses could be interesting even for the DX crowd, especially the
28-300mm lens because of the 1.5x crop factor. The main issue I have with
the 28-300mm lens is the hood, as shown in the video above.

【在 G**Y 的大作中提到】

: 这下high了
: http://nikonrumors.com/2010/10/24/nikon-24-120mm-f4g-ed-vr-vs-nikon-28-300mm-f3-5-5-6-ed-vr.aspx

M*82010-11-12 08:11

7 楼

只要一单大于等于25就可以了

【在 L******h 的大作中提到】

: 具体要求是什么？能说说吗？

C*c2010-11-12 08:11

8 楼

退一步说，24-70即使锐度比不过28-300，他还有全程F2.8

slightly
I

【在 G**Y 的大作中提到】

: 锐度摘要：
: Based on those test chart images, I would say that at 28mm both lenses
: perform almost identical (the 24-120 is slightly sharper).
: At 50mm focal length and f/4.5 aperture I think the 24-120 performs slightly
: better than the 28-300mm lens. At aperture f/5.6 I could not see any
: differences between both lenses.
: At 120mm f/5.6 I could not see a difference in the test charts of both
: lenses. Just a note: the 28-300 test shots were actually done at 122mm, I
: couldn’t fine tune the zoom to be exactly 120mm.
: 。。。