r*i
2 楼
你介绍一下吧，如果比较有意思，我就去看
【在 H***l 的大作中提到】
: 作者：Stephen Wolfram
: 有人看过么
【在 H***l 的大作中提到】
: 作者：Stephen Wolfram
: 有人看过么
t*n
3 楼
没看过书，Wolfram 人是天才；发明的Mathematica也极有用。但看过Physics Today 上
物理界大牛Kadanoff
的书评[1]。Kadanoff说这本书介绍cellular automata 通俗易懂,可惜有关历史不大确切
，而且他把自个当年的专业cellular automata 吹成万能。
可能有象牙塔里的学者嫉妒别人经商赚大钱的心态。不过自己去看看Wolfram给这本书造
势的网页[2]， 觉得Kadanoff说得也不是太过。与其起名《A New Kind of Science》,还
不如老实一点称作《An Introduction to Cellular Automata Through Mathematica》。
[1] http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-55/iss-7/p55.html
[2] http://www.wolframscience.com/
【在 H***l 的大作中提到】
: 作者：Stephen Wolfram
: 有人看过么
e*e
4 楼
Kadanoff哪里说了Wolfram是天才？是你自己说的吧。
我觉得Kadanoff的评论很客观。你揣测别人嫉妒一个商人，未免有以
小人之心度君子之腹的味道。
【在 t*******n 的大作中提到】
:
: 没看过书，Wolfram 人是天才；发明的Mathematica也极有用。但看过Physics Today 上
: 物理界大牛Kadanoff
: 的书评[1]。Kadanoff说这本书介绍cellular automata 通俗易懂,可惜有关历史不大确切
: ，而且他把自个当年的专业cellular automata 吹成万能。
: 可能有象牙塔里的学者嫉妒别人经商赚大钱的心态。不过自己去看看Wolfram给这本书造
: 势的网页[2]， 觉得Kadanoff说得也不是太过。与其起名《A New Kind of Science》,还
: 不如老实一点称作《An Introduction to Cellular Automata Through Mathematica》。
:
: [1] http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-55/iss-7/p55.html
我觉得Kadanoff的评论很客观。你揣测别人嫉妒一个商人，未免有以
小人之心度君子之腹的味道。
【在 t*******n 的大作中提到】
:
: 没看过书，Wolfram 人是天才；发明的Mathematica也极有用。但看过Physics Today 上
: 物理界大牛Kadanoff
: 的书评[1]。Kadanoff说这本书介绍cellular automata 通俗易懂,可惜有关历史不大确切
: ，而且他把自个当年的专业cellular automata 吹成万能。
: 可能有象牙塔里的学者嫉妒别人经商赚大钱的心态。不过自己去看看Wolfram给这本书造
: 势的网页[2]， 觉得Kadanoff说得也不是太过。与其起名《A New Kind of Science》,还
: 不如老实一点称作《An Introduction to Cellular Automata Through Mathematica》。
:
: [1] http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-55/iss-7/p55.html
o*e
5 楼
Leo P. Kadanoff (a physicist and mathematician working at the James Franck
Institute of the University of Chicago) writes:
"From my reading, I cannot support the view that any "new kind of science" is
displayed in Wolfram's new book. I see no new kinds of calculations, no new
analytic theory, and no comparison with experiment.
Per Bak's book, How Nature Works (Copernicus, 1997), covers subjects similar
to those of Gleick and Wolfram and looks specifically at automaton studies and
at Wolfram. Bak
【在 e******e 的大作中提到】
: Kadanoff哪里说了Wolfram是天才？是你自己说的吧。
: 我觉得Kadanoff的评论很客观。你揣测别人嫉妒一个商人，未免有以
: 小人之心度君子之腹的味道。
Institute of the University of Chicago) writes:
"From my reading, I cannot support the view that any "new kind of science" is
displayed in Wolfram's new book. I see no new kinds of calculations, no new
analytic theory, and no comparison with experiment.
Per Bak's book, How Nature Works (Copernicus, 1997), covers subjects similar
to those of Gleick and Wolfram and looks specifically at automaton studies and
at Wolfram. Bak
【在 e******e 的大作中提到】
: Kadanoff哪里说了Wolfram是天才？是你自己说的吧。
: 我觉得Kadanoff的评论很客观。你揣测别人嫉妒一个商人，未免有以
: 小人之心度君子之腹的味道。
e*e
6 楼
check out this comments from amazon.com. The most incisive
comments that I have ever read about the book and the author.
============
367 of 414 people found the following review helpful:
He's got it all wrong, May 22, 2002
Reviewer: Anonymous Professor from USA
This is a self-published book by a self-described genius who claims to have
revolutionized all of science. It's about what you'd expect for such a publi
cation. Wolfram is not a crank in the usual sense (he doesn't claim that
Einstein wa
comments that I have ever read about the book and the author.
============
367 of 414 people found the following review helpful:
He's got it all wrong, May 22, 2002
Reviewer: Anonymous Professor from USA
This is a self-published book by a self-described genius who claims to have
revolutionized all of science. It's about what you'd expect for such a publi
cation. Wolfram is not a crank in the usual sense (he doesn't claim that
Einstein wa
t*n
7 楼
不好意思，凭回忆写的没查原文，这两条可能是偶的意见。原来的帖子已经修正了。不过
Wolfram 正版的自传里面有"In recognition of his early work in physics and
computing, Wolfram （b.1959）became in 1981 the youngest recipient of a
MacArthur Prize Fellowship." 叫天才也算合适。
学院派学者给下海发财后出书者写书评，唧唧歪歪话里藏针是常见的（例如名门正户的经
济学家门骂George Soros比这难听N倍，虽然前者炒股的经验不及后者1/N)。Kadanoff 抱
怨“Another structural difficulty arises from Wolfram's use of his own
proprietary computer language in place of the usual mathematical notation.
Since I am not fluent in the proprietary language,
【在 e******e 的大作中提到】
: Kadanoff哪里说了Wolfram是天才？是你自己说的吧。
: 我觉得Kadanoff的评论很客观。你揣测别人嫉妒一个商人，未免有以
: 小人之心度君子之腹的味道。
Wolfram 正版的自传里面有"In recognition of his early work in physics and
computing, Wolfram （b.1959）became in 1981 the youngest recipient of a
MacArthur Prize Fellowship." 叫天才也算合适。
学院派学者给下海发财后出书者写书评，唧唧歪歪话里藏针是常见的（例如名门正户的经
济学家门骂George Soros比这难听N倍，虽然前者炒股的经验不及后者1/N)。Kadanoff 抱
怨“Another structural difficulty arises from Wolfram's use of his own
proprietary computer language in place of the usual mathematical notation.
Since I am not fluent in the proprietary language,
【在 e******e 的大作中提到】
: Kadanoff哪里说了Wolfram是天才？是你自己说的吧。
: 我觉得Kadanoff的评论很客观。你揣测别人嫉妒一个商人，未免有以
: 小人之心度君子之腹的味道。
o*e
8 楼
鲁迅写的?
before
authentic
river
cellular
by
great
``fractals'',
semiconductors
chemist
case
automata
free
on
【在 e******e 的大作中提到】
: check out this comments from amazon.com. The most incisive
: comments that I have ever read about the book and the author.
: ============
: 367 of 414 people found the following review helpful:
: He's got it all wrong, May 22, 2002
: Reviewer: Anonymous Professor from USA
: This is a self-published book by a self-described genius who claims to have
: revolutionized all of science. It's about what you'd expect for such a publi
: cation. Wolfram is not a crank in the usual sense (he doesn't claim that
: Einstein wa
before
authentic
river
cellular
by
great
``fractals'',
semiconductors
chemist
case
automata
free
on
【在 e******e 的大作中提到】
: check out this comments from amazon.com. The most incisive
: comments that I have ever read about the book and the author.
: ============
: 367 of 414 people found the following review helpful:
: He's got it all wrong, May 22, 2002
: Reviewer: Anonymous Professor from USA
: This is a self-published book by a self-described genius who claims to have
: revolutionized all of science. It's about what you'd expect for such a publi
: cation. Wolfram is not a crank in the usual sense (he doesn't claim that
: Einstein wa
e*e
9 楼
Wolfram曾经很有天分，但可惜天分没有被演化成天才。伤仲永的故事并
不乏其他的版本。
Kadanoff哪里说了不该用mathematica? 他只是抱怨Wolfram没有用通用
的数学表达方式，换句话说，他没有用大家通用的语言。这个是事实，
说出来不算过分吧。
【在 t*******n 的大作中提到】
: 不好意思，凭回忆写的没查原文，这两条可能是偶的意见。原来的帖子已经修正了。不过
: Wolfram 正版的自传里面有"In recognition of his early work in physics and
: computing, Wolfram （b.1959）became in 1981 the youngest recipient of a
: MacArthur Prize Fellowship." 叫天才也算合适。
: 学院派学者给下海发财后出书者写书评，唧唧歪歪话里藏针是常见的（例如名门正户的经
: 济学家门骂George Soros比这难听N倍，虽然前者炒股的经验不及后者1/N)。Kadanoff 抱
: 怨“Another structural difficulty arises from Wolfram's use of his own
: proprietary computer language in place of the usual mathematical notation.
: Since I am not fluent in the proprietary language,
不乏其他的版本。
Kadanoff哪里说了不该用mathematica? 他只是抱怨Wolfram没有用通用
的数学表达方式，换句话说，他没有用大家通用的语言。这个是事实，
说出来不算过分吧。
【在 t*******n 的大作中提到】
: 不好意思，凭回忆写的没查原文，这两条可能是偶的意见。原来的帖子已经修正了。不过
: Wolfram 正版的自传里面有"In recognition of his early work in physics and
: computing, Wolfram （b.1959）became in 1981 the youngest recipient of a
: MacArthur Prize Fellowship." 叫天才也算合适。
: 学院派学者给下海发财后出书者写书评，唧唧歪歪话里藏针是常见的（例如名门正户的经
: 济学家门骂George Soros比这难听N倍，虽然前者炒股的经验不及后者1/N)。Kadanoff 抱
: 怨“Another structural difficulty arises from Wolfram's use of his own
: proprietary computer language in place of the usual mathematical notation.
: Since I am not fluent in the proprietary language,
o*e
10 楼
过
还是很牛的,当年神童级别的.
经
抱
the
的
难
里
给
【在 t*******n 的大作中提到】
: 不好意思，凭回忆写的没查原文，这两条可能是偶的意见。原来的帖子已经修正了。不过
: Wolfram 正版的自传里面有"In recognition of his early work in physics and
: computing, Wolfram （b.1959）became in 1981 the youngest recipient of a
: MacArthur Prize Fellowship." 叫天才也算合适。
: 学院派学者给下海发财后出书者写书评，唧唧歪歪话里藏针是常见的（例如名门正户的经
: 济学家门骂George Soros比这难听N倍，虽然前者炒股的经验不及后者1/N)。Kadanoff 抱
: 怨“Another structural difficulty arises from Wolfram's use of his own
: proprietary computer language in place of the usual mathematical notation.
: Since I am not fluent in the proprietary language,
o*e
11 楼
他比仲永还是强点,主要是太狂.
不过
的经
Soros比这难听N倍，虽然前者炒股的经验不及后者1/N)。Kadanoff 抱
the
头的
friendly的Mathematica（难
【在 e******e 的大作中提到】
: Wolfram曾经很有天分，但可惜天分没有被演化成天才。伤仲永的故事并
: 不乏其他的版本。
: Kadanoff哪里说了不该用mathematica? 他只是抱怨Wolfram没有用通用
: 的数学表达方式，换句话说，他没有用大家通用的语言。这个是事实，
: 说出来不算过分吧。
不过
的经
Soros比这难听N倍，虽然前者炒股的经验不及后者1/N)。Kadanoff 抱
the
头的
friendly的Mathematica（难
【在 e******e 的大作中提到】
: Wolfram曾经很有天分，但可惜天分没有被演化成天才。伤仲永的故事并
: 不乏其他的版本。
: Kadanoff哪里说了不该用mathematica? 他只是抱怨Wolfram没有用通用
: 的数学表达方式，换句话说，他没有用大家通用的语言。这个是事实，
: 说出来不算过分吧。
相关阅读