【在 c****u 的大作中提到】 : well, perhaps abacusr is right, you really should read a little bit : introduction on QM... Still, LCX might not have carefully read it either.
Don't be a big fuss. It is real science. Last year, there was a research paper on science journal to talk this kind of theory. I didn't read it cause it is too weird. Anyway, Liu is not that smart to create such thoery by his own.
True. We live in such a society that everyone is constantly bombed by ton's of new thoughts and theories. Hardly anyone can find anything totally brand new . And a lot of questions have been discussed thousands of times in history, from different aspect. That's what I said" Chewing a bun which has been chewed thousands of times by ancestos"
【在 a***n 的大作中提到】 : Don't be a big fuss. It is real science. : Last year, there was a research paper on science journal to talk this kind of : theory. I didn't read it cause it is too weird. Anyway, Liu is not that smart : to create such thoery by his own.
not really. it's only one of the intepretations of QM. there are many others. the one mentioned here looks like the consistant hitory of QM. the only thing I feel uneasy with this intepretation is that it seems to assume a presence of God, who knows everything and are outside of the universe. So we as a single observer are only the child of God and can never be God and have to obey God .....
You may think this way:Is a "reality" not being observered by anyone meaningful? If it is, then we have infinite number of "realities" which can't be observered because they don't exist in our words, are they all meaningful? You never know. I would restrict the "reality" to those I can observe and being repeatable.
【在 p*****e 的大作中提到】 : not really. it's only one of the intepretations of QM. there are many others. : the one mentioned here looks like the consistant hitory of QM. : the only thing I feel uneasy with this intepretation is that it seems to : assume a presence of God, who knows everything and are outside of the : universe. So we as a single observer are only the child of God and can never : be God and have to obey God .....
x*u
27 楼
中文好啊,我已经淘汰拼音了,改用牛排手写
p*e
28 楼
if, let's assume the consistant history interpretation is correct, for now. and let's assume that what you said is also right, then the question is: why do we invent things to descript the world which are never going to be meaningful? all I am trying to say is that the multi-history seems to be a tautology, not necessary. And I can never know all those "realities", or not even know whether they are all meaningful, but they do exists in our formulation of the universe, doesn't that imply somethi
【在 a******y 的大作中提到】 : You may think this way:Is a "reality" not being observered by anyone meaningful? : If it is, then we have infinite number of "realities" which can't be observered : because they don't exist in our words, are they all meaningful? You never know. : I would restrict the "reality" to those I can observe and being repeatable.