s*i
3 楼
要看TIM的原文,现在的媒体都在曲解苹果的立场。苹果不是不愿意帮忙,而是不愿意
开后门。如果,破解必须开后门,那么宁可不破案也不应该开后门,因为开后门的害处
远大于一个案子。
开后门。如果,破解必须开后门,那么宁可不破案也不应该开后门,因为开后门的害处
远大于一个案子。
a*t
4 楼
就是装。。。Court给个warrant,家都可以抄个底朝天,一个手机算个p。炒作吧。这
年头ceo们都得演戏才能卖出产品。
年头ceo们都得演戏才能卖出产品。
t*c
5 楼
"We have great respect for the professionals at the FBI, and we believe
their intentions are good. Up to this point, we have done everything that is
both within our power and within the law to help them. But now the U.S.
government has asked us for something we simply do not have, and something
we consider too dangerous to create. They have asked us to build a backdoor
to the iPhone."
苹果做了该做的,但拒绝build a backdoor,这个还是应该赞许的。
their intentions are good. Up to this point, we have done everything that is
both within our power and within the law to help them. But now the U.S.
government has asked us for something we simply do not have, and something
we consider too dangerous to create. They have asked us to build a backdoor
to the iPhone."
苹果做了该做的,但拒绝build a backdoor,这个还是应该赞许的。
s*i
12 楼
苹果的重点不是保护某个人的隐私,而是不能提供一种可以打开任何人隐私的工具。
N*d
14 楼
俺觉得Bill Gates是对的。如果给某人一百个iPhone, 然后开枪把他一条腿打残,有多
少人会接受这种交换?
[在 yyber (忍而不发) 的大作中提到:]
:FBI让你帮忙给破案,你说要保护隐私。。
:
:...........
少人会接受这种交换?
[在 yyber (忍而不发) 的大作中提到:]
:FBI让你帮忙给破案,你说要保护隐私。。
:
:...........
相关阅读