这里的人肉小孩的暴民快赶上俄州的绑架三个女孩的绑架强奸犯了！# WaterWorld - 未名水世界
B*e
1 楼
你们这帮暴民人肉小孩， 还有讨论谋杀孙和她的同学们！ 你们快赶上俄州的绑架三个
女孩的绑架强奸犯了！
女孩的绑架强奸犯了！
z*1
2 楼
放屁。孙鉈站在权力高处，犯下滔天罪行现在还缩头乌龟，这你不管， 你他妈的倒是
管人肉几个嫌疑人的小孩。 什么居心？ 人肉的小孩在这里根本不是主要矛盾。你不用
来混淆视听了。以为别人和你一样傻。
管人肉几个嫌疑人的小孩。 什么居心？ 人肉的小孩在这里根本不是主要矛盾。你不用
来混淆视听了。以为别人和你一样傻。
B*e
3 楼
晒暴民。
【在 z********1 的大作中提到】
: 放屁。孙鉈站在权力高处，犯下滔天罪行现在还缩头乌龟，这你不管， 你他妈的倒是
: 管人肉几个嫌疑人的小孩。 什么居心？ 人肉的小孩在这里根本不是主要矛盾。你不用
: 来混淆视听了。以为别人和你一样傻。
【在 z********1 的大作中提到】
: 放屁。孙鉈站在权力高处，犯下滔天罪行现在还缩头乌龟，这你不管， 你他妈的倒是
: 管人肉几个嫌疑人的小孩。 什么居心？ 人肉的小孩在这里根本不是主要矛盾。你不用
: 来混淆视听了。以为别人和你一样傻。
H*g
4 楼
你楼上就是。祝他/她出门被鸡奸/强奸。
【在 B********e 的大作中提到】
: 晒暴民。
【在 B********e 的大作中提到】
: 晒暴民。
H*g
5 楼
你是什么居心？小孩就不是人？你是人吗？不如我去人肉你，然后把你所有隐私都给曝
光了如何?
【在 z********1 的大作中提到】
: 放屁。孙鉈站在权力高处，犯下滔天罪行现在还缩头乌龟，这你不管， 你他妈的倒是
: 管人肉几个嫌疑人的小孩。 什么居心？ 人肉的小孩在这里根本不是主要矛盾。你不用
: 来混淆视听了。以为别人和你一样傻。
光了如何?
【在 z********1 的大作中提到】
: 放屁。孙鉈站在权力高处，犯下滔天罪行现在还缩头乌龟，这你不管， 你他妈的倒是
: 管人肉几个嫌疑人的小孩。 什么居心？ 人肉的小孩在这里根本不是主要矛盾。你不用
: 来混淆视听了。以为别人和你一样傻。
y*y
6 楼
Okay, don't blow the sh1t out of proportion. Give the issue some context and
put the debate in perspective - We are talking about - losing someone's
privacy vs. losing someone's 19 years of youth and the rest of decent life.
What's more devastating?
put the debate in perspective - We are talking about - losing someone's
privacy vs. losing someone's 19 years of youth and the rest of decent life.
What's more devastating?
J*4
7 楼
来，请朱令案被人肉的受害者正式起诉暴民~~~
赶紧的~~~这么人神共愤的罪行~~~我第一个支持哦~~~
^_^
赶紧的~~~这么人神共愤的罪行~~~我第一个支持哦~~~
^_^
t*e
8 楼
人肉小孩是对的，谁也不想自己的孩子和他在一个学校， 自己的孩子太优秀会有危险
的。
的。
k*s
9 楼
铊妇们毒害朱令父母的女儿就高尚了么..
既然铊妇逃过了, 母债子还也是中国几千年传统呢
既然铊妇逃过了, 母债子还也是中国几千年传统呢
i*c
10 楼
lz's topic is about moral standard. Your statement is saying that innocent
child deserved to be exposed because ZL lost her 19 years, in this case your
moral standard is equally low. I have to question your motive, do you
really care about ZL?
and
.
【在 y*****y 的大作中提到】
: Okay, don't blow the sh1t out of proportion. Give the issue some context and
: put the debate in perspective - We are talking about - losing someone's
: privacy vs. losing someone's 19 years of youth and the rest of decent life.
: What's more devastating?
child deserved to be exposed because ZL lost her 19 years, in this case your
moral standard is equally low. I have to question your motive, do you
really care about ZL?
and
.
【在 y*****y 的大作中提到】
: Okay, don't blow the sh1t out of proportion. Give the issue some context and
: put the debate in perspective - We are talking about - losing someone's
: privacy vs. losing someone's 19 years of youth and the rest of decent life.
: What's more devastating?
y*y
11 楼
I have already pointed out your logical errors in the other post.
You are stretching your arguments, my friend. I didn't say it's the right
thing to do to expose their child info online. But the harm/damage of losing
their child privacy is no way compared to the loss of 19 years of youth.
Do you agree with this point?
It is not conversely true, as you stated, "because ZL lost 19 years of her
best life, that innocent child must be exposed on the internet to the public
". Your logic is flawed. In fact, based on the damage, if you really insist
to equate the two, then poisoning the child would be equivalent in terms of
the damage, not just losing privacy.
innocent
your
【在 i******c 的大作中提到】
: lz's topic is about moral standard. Your statement is saying that innocent
: child deserved to be exposed because ZL lost her 19 years, in this case your
: moral standard is equally low. I have to question your motive, do you
: really care about ZL?
:
: and
: .
You are stretching your arguments, my friend. I didn't say it's the right
thing to do to expose their child info online. But the harm/damage of losing
their child privacy is no way compared to the loss of 19 years of youth.
Do you agree with this point?
It is not conversely true, as you stated, "because ZL lost 19 years of her
best life, that innocent child must be exposed on the internet to the public
". Your logic is flawed. In fact, based on the damage, if you really insist
to equate the two, then poisoning the child would be equivalent in terms of
the damage, not just losing privacy.
innocent
your
【在 i******c 的大作中提到】
: lz's topic is about moral standard. Your statement is saying that innocent
: child deserved to be exposed because ZL lost her 19 years, in this case your
: moral standard is equally low. I have to question your motive, do you
: really care about ZL?
:
: and
: .
d*8
12 楼
支持人肉,还要人肉铊党全家!大家不要懈怠,电子邮件群发,facebook,qq,扩散扩散再扩
散,让铊党永世不得安身!
散,让铊党永世不得安身!
相关阅读
美国金库——Fort Knox两口子黑发生出金发的娃娃， 是不是女的偷人了？奥巴马习近平会谈不欢而散 (转载)[合集] 中国楼市泡沫的引爆者将是美国银行信托做空基金 (转载)帖子中说到：熟悉孙家的都说这家人“聪明绝顶”习近平奥巴马散步交谈曝光：称每天游泳一千米 (转载)吓一跳这是出国母粉和国母黑了？加纳是什么烂国？连我鳖都敢惹？[合集] 窦唯的故事真是让人唏嘘廈門公交爆炸案傷者家屬不滿處理效率 (转载)[合集] 论坛上的小圈子现象，是不是大陆人特有的？树倒猢狲散，朱令案该打一点鸡血了[合集] 真的勇士， 敢于娶上海女人六毛党菜场大妈致搬砖大妈的一封信(转载)女人走到哪跟到哪， 是不是挺烦人的？猴子似的米茄儿怎么和彭大妈相比？广东人说英语都是一口标准的伦敦腔 (转载)[合集] 【黄河兰州段水域漂下上万具浮尸！！！中国大陆！】端午节的英文翻译彭大妈最适合在家给娃喂奶， 做做饭， 哼个小调