No More Proletarian Revolution

No More Proletarian Revolution


Image result for proletarian revolution

There will be no more proletarian revolution in China and around the world. A proletarian revolution will not happen because workers in the industry of large-scale production today are not at the bottom of society, nor are they the primary labor force in demographics.

Today’s economy has been globalized. Technology has been advanced by the information revolution of the 1990s. The global economic structure is a North-South structure, typically, is the structure of made in China and consumed in America.”

American Manufacturing is just a small part of the American economy. 70% of the U.S. GDP is in the service industry. The manufacturing industry today has more white-collar employees due to automation and digitalization. Blue-collar workers in large-scale manufacturers are no longer proletarian. Unions are wealthy interest groups. They have secured jobs and generous pensions while workers in other industries are jealous of these jobs. When the minimum wage in the U.S. is less than $10/hour, the blue-collar in unionized large-scale production, such as the automobile industry, are paid more than $30/hour. Workers in the industry of large-scale production have a social status above the average. They are part of the middle-income class. Their living standard and financial position are better than many small business owners, the petty bourgeoisies.

The marginalized groups are those whose income depends on minimum wage. Their jobs are part-time, on-call, no union, no contract, depending on tips from customers. But they are not the major production force that constitutes the production mode of society. They are in the service industry.

When we talk about classes in Marxist theory, we refer to groups in primary production and lifestyle. When Marx spoke of the proletariat, he referred to the laborer who is an industrial worker explored by the capitalist. The proletariat in classical Marxist theory does not exist in today’s global economy. The high-tech industry represents the advanced level of production, and the labor force in high-tech is engineers, such as in Microsoft and Google.

Chinese industrialization process since 1949 has always given workers the highest social status and honor as workers are the leading class in a country the Communist Party is in power. Being a worker has always been the dream of many Chinese people. If workers in China are the proletariats, then they are living in a country where the proletariat governs through the Communist Party.

In the last four decades, many western enterprises have invested in China, so we can say that workers in foreign factories are working for capital, and in fact, foreign capital makes a profit by sourcing cheap Chinese laborers. Some workers were tragically exploited by foreign and domestic capital. These mistreatments of workers, such as delays and refusal to pay wages, had been reported by the media and the Chinese government has made regulations to correct the situation and protect the interests of workers. Those exploitations did not spread on a large scale and did not last for long. It happened as Deng was crossing the river by touching the stones. It is not intended to allow it to happen in socialist China.

Most of the large-scale production industries in China are state-owned enterprises or enterprises privatized from former state-owned enterprises. These enterprises constitute the fundamental pillars of the Chinese economy and dominate the Chinese production mode. The production relationship in this socialist production mode is different from capitalist countries. There is no conflict of interest between workers and the management team. Both workers and management teams share the same goal of making China prosperous. Workers are not the object of capital purchase for profit. For example, Chinese telecommunication companies extend cell phone networks to even the most remote poor areas. Such business operation is impossible in the US as it is unprofitable. This business operation is not profit-oriented but social well-being-oriented.

On the surface, the market economy is the same in China and in the US. But in essence, the driving force in the Chinese economy includes not only corporate profits but also social externalities. Even though China’s technology and business practice in the market economy is lagging behind the western capitalist countries, China has a socialist production relationship. Because China has a more advanced production relation, China has the most advanced production power in the world. China leads the mobile payments because China has a mobile network covering every corner of the country and no other country can match. In short, China’s rise from an inferior market position after joining the WTO is due to the competitiveness of the most advanced production relationship. The low production cost in China is labeled as cheap labor; however, the real reason is the socialist production relation. Workers at the forefront of the production lines know the details of problems in production. In socialist production relations, workers are treated as individuals who have the motivation to improve production efficiency. In capitalist production relations, workers are regarded as resources of absolute obedience to management. In socialist production relations, workers and management work side by side to run the business together. The management cost is much lower as there is no conflict of interest between the management team and workers. In capitalist production relations, there is always a conflict between workers and the management team. Workers are run by the management team, not running the production. The conflict between the management team and workers requires higher internal control costs, and workers have no incentive to improve production efficiency. Workers are incentivized by payment only and are coerced by the threat of dismissal.

In 1949, when Red China was established, 90% of the population was in the countryside. The population in the countryside was poor as the production level is low. Over the past four decades, China has eliminated absolute poverty, most through industrialization. One of the major channels of poverty alleviation is to let the rural population become urban workers. Factory workers earn more than many rural workers. Young people from the countryside feel lucky to find a job in the city. They improved their living standard as a worker. They remitted their income to the countryside to support their families. They accumulate savings to gain financial freedom. They learn new skills. They familiarize themselves with metropolitan life. It is a springboard for them to jump into higher social stratification. Some of them can develop their own business after working as workers for a couple of years. Industrialization and poverty alleviation are two intertwining processes that changed Chinese society rapidly with a huge flow of social mobility that human history has never experienced before. Workers are not poor compared to laborers in the remote countryside. Becoming a worker can get rid of poverty.

The world's poor are the population of unindustrialized areas. They are poor not because they are the proletariat, but because they have no work. The current world economic and political system marginalizes the poor. they can not enter the system as production workers. If becoming a worker is raising their social status, the worker is not a proletariat, and the worker does not need a proletarian revolution. For this to happen, there are two ways: the influx of refugees into a developed country, which will immediately enhance their economic status; and the BRI development of infrastructure in developing countries to bring the population there into the current world economic and political system. BRI promote industrialization in developing countries, help marginalized people become workers, and lifts them out of poverty.

Marx believes that the progress of productive forces will promote the progress of mankind. But the superstructure suitable for the old economic base will resist the new advanced production level. Therefore, there is a conflict between the old superstructure and the new mode of production. This conflict, manifested in chaotic social tensions, evolved into a revolution that would change the superstructure to accommodate the new production model.

The 2008 financial tsunami showed that America's superstructure could not adapt to the information revolution of the 1990s. However, China can adapt well to the new production model. After 2008, with the accumulation of government and household debt, the western world economy stagnated. On the other hand, China continues to develop at a high speed and constructs a high-speed train network. China has a superstructure of a socialist society that can adapt to the new mode of production. China has socialist relations of production. Socialist relations of production and new power of production form an advanced economic base.

When Marx talked about the proletariat, he considered the industry of large-scale production as the capitalist production mode. When we character a society by its production mode, we refer to the most advanced industry. The most advanced industry comprises the most advanced productive force. Today, the most advanced production power is not the industry of large-scale production, but high tech. The western world cannot adapt to the globalization brought by high tech. Trump launched a trade war against China and repelled globalization. Trump's trade war is the modern Ludditism against technological progress. Many western thank tanks fear the AI revolution, considering it disruptive and destructive innovations. China will lead the Industrial Revolution 4.0 as China has advanced production relations and advanced superstructure.

High tech represents the future production mode. In the high-tech industry, workers are not the production labor. The engineers are. As a result,  blue-collar workers can not be advanced political forces. Blue-collar workers working at Google are janitors and food service workers. They are not production workers.

The high-tech industry is booming in China. The Chinese government puts reform on the regular government agenda. Reform is a task for China to constantly adjust its superstructure to its productive capacity. China is still behind the west in science and innovation, yet when advanced technology enters the production area, China can adapt to it fast. The US has an inertial superstructure that resists the advancement of production power.

Image result for proletarian revolution

In a society characterized by high-tech industries, workers are not the key production force. The engineers are. So we will not have a proletarian revolution. In classical Marxism, the capitalist mode of production is the means of labor production. In today's production model, it is an engineer realizing the production.

China does not need a revolution, because China is constantly reforming to develop the superstructure, so the superstructure is constantly modified to adapt to the new production capacity.

There can be no proletarian revolution in the United States,  as the class representing the new production mode is not blue-collar workers but engineers. What the US needs is not a proletarian revolution but a cultural revolution. The communist and socialist parties in the world should focus their tasks on organizing engineers, technicians, skilled workers, and scientists into an intellectual political force to make a cultural revolution that the US needed to adapt to the Industrial Revolution 4.0. Intellectuals are the productive forces of the future, and they should make progress in developed countries as political forces.

戳这里 Claim your page
来源: 文学城-唵啊吽