J*n
2 楼
I have two proteins, and the binding is not very strong. IP and pull-down
assay showed positive results. But we want to have other evidence of the
binding?
Is ITC a good tool to study protein-protein interaction?
And is there any other approaches to study protein-protein interaction? Size
exclusion chromatography? SPR? ....
Many thanks in advance!
assay showed positive results. But we want to have other evidence of the
binding?
Is ITC a good tool to study protein-protein interaction?
And is there any other approaches to study protein-protein interaction? Size
exclusion chromatography? SPR? ....
Many thanks in advance!
p*n
3 楼
spr
itc is not good for weak interactions.
sec may work. get a hplc sec column.
Size
【在 J*****n 的大作中提到】
: I have two proteins, and the binding is not very strong. IP and pull-down
: assay showed positive results. But we want to have other evidence of the
: binding?
: Is ITC a good tool to study protein-protein interaction?
: And is there any other approaches to study protein-protein interaction? Size
: exclusion chromatography? SPR? ....
: Many thanks in advance!
itc is not good for weak interactions.
sec may work. get a hplc sec column.
Size
【在 J*****n 的大作中提到】
: I have two proteins, and the binding is not very strong. IP and pull-down
: assay showed positive results. But we want to have other evidence of the
: binding?
: Is ITC a good tool to study protein-protein interaction?
: And is there any other approaches to study protein-protein interaction? Size
: exclusion chromatography? SPR? ....
: Many thanks in advance!
e*s
4 楼
Sec won"t work for weak association.
Weak protein-protein interaction is always hard to confirm.
If one protein is small, you may try FP.
【在 p*****n 的大作中提到】
: spr
: itc is not good for weak interactions.
: sec may work. get a hplc sec column.
:
: Size
Weak protein-protein interaction is always hard to confirm.
If one protein is small, you may try FP.
【在 p*****n 的大作中提到】
: spr
: itc is not good for weak interactions.
: sec may work. get a hplc sec column.
:
: Size
l*1
5 楼
FRET
k*0
6 楼
Your answer is quite right.
【在 e****s 的大作中提到】
: Sec won"t work for weak association.
: Weak protein-protein interaction is always hard to confirm.
: If one protein is small, you may try FP.
【在 e****s 的大作中提到】
: Sec won"t work for weak association.
: Weak protein-protein interaction is always hard to confirm.
: If one protein is small, you may try FP.
A*w
7 楼
For ITC, you need milligrams of protein.
SPR, you need much less.
Another easy one is chemical cross-linking...
SPR, you need much less.
Another easy one is chemical cross-linking...
H*g
8 楼
There are many ways to show protein-protein interaction; However, I would
suggest u to forget any additional in vitro assays. You already got IP and
pull-down, so do not waste time on other in vitro ones.
In your case, if I were the reviewer, I would directly ask for evidence from
other perspectives, in addition to all those in vitro assays. I would ask
for assays testing in vivo, real-time interactions, such as BiFC or FRET, as
well as any evidence demonstrating genetic interaction to support that the
physical interaction is biological meaningful.
Size
【在 J*****n 的大作中提到】
: I have two proteins, and the binding is not very strong. IP and pull-down
: assay showed positive results. But we want to have other evidence of the
: binding?
: Is ITC a good tool to study protein-protein interaction?
: And is there any other approaches to study protein-protein interaction? Size
: exclusion chromatography? SPR? ....
: Many thanks in advance!
suggest u to forget any additional in vitro assays. You already got IP and
pull-down, so do not waste time on other in vitro ones.
In your case, if I were the reviewer, I would directly ask for evidence from
other perspectives, in addition to all those in vitro assays. I would ask
for assays testing in vivo, real-time interactions, such as BiFC or FRET, as
well as any evidence demonstrating genetic interaction to support that the
physical interaction is biological meaningful.
Size
【在 J*****n 的大作中提到】
: I have two proteins, and the binding is not very strong. IP and pull-down
: assay showed positive results. But we want to have other evidence of the
: binding?
: Is ITC a good tool to study protein-protein interaction?
: And is there any other approaches to study protein-protein interaction? Size
: exclusion chromatography? SPR? ....
: Many thanks in advance!
J*n
9 楼
Thank you all for the kindly replies.
Two of my proteins, one is 44 kd and another is 67, therefore I do not think
it is appropriate to use FP.
ITC did not give me positive results.
SEC showed binding but the peaks are ambiguous.
We might try MALS...not sure if it will be successful.
Actually, to be more specific, we want to check the binding stoichiometry of
these two proteins. Any suggestion?
Many thanks!
Two of my proteins, one is 44 kd and another is 67, therefore I do not think
it is appropriate to use FP.
ITC did not give me positive results.
SEC showed binding but the peaks are ambiguous.
We might try MALS...not sure if it will be successful.
Actually, to be more specific, we want to check the binding stoichiometry of
these two proteins. Any suggestion?
Many thanks!
相关阅读
science signaling 怎么样？###此帖已应当事人要求删除###转读CS的，可以加入我们群啊超萌的白细胞捕捉细菌以及袖手旁观的红细胞 (转载)图像荧光强度积分各种阴谋论可以休也碰到这种申请怎么办？看上面的帖子， yang ww 这个一作也太productive了请大虾们推荐一个构建质粒的公司吧难道你们以为申请千青就是数数SCI文章吗？RNA seq 数据统计分析问题请教该选哪种statistic test？找一个蛋白的binding protein或者靶基因有什么好办法？想问下targeted resequencing的方法有哪些？好消息：湖南转基因大米事件3人被撤职 (转载)第四批青年千人最可惜的落选者（中大生科院80后牛人崔隽）GST pull-down 相关问题，谢谢！没有中国学生的实验室一律不要去，没有中国教授的系一律不要去。真理！在johns hopkins做技术员，一年三万加保险能活下去吗Genome Medicine 文章一篇：包子求