m*d
2 楼
【 以下文字转载自 Detective 讨论区 】
发信人: mind (mind), 信区: Detective
标 题: 国产门锁成功阻碍美特种部队快速破门抓捕企图
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 7 08:28:02 2011, 美东)
据外电报道，美海豹突击队在抓捕拉登过程中，意外发现拉登住处大院使用国产门锁，
使用多种手段均无法打开，从而被迫翻墙进入。美方有关人士表示，如能顺利打开门锁
，抓捕行动至少可以缩短15分钟以上。
发信人: mind (mind), 信区: Detective
标 题: 国产门锁成功阻碍美特种部队快速破门抓捕企图
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 7 08:28:02 2011, 美东)
据外电报道，美海豹突击队在抓捕拉登过程中，意外发现拉登住处大院使用国产门锁，
使用多种手段均无法打开，从而被迫翻墙进入。美方有关人士表示，如能顺利打开门锁
，抓捕行动至少可以缩短15分钟以上。
f*4
3 楼
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2861588/Professor-dead-
Professor found dead after cash row: Cancer scientist said to have told
fellow academics that chiefs treated him 'like s***'
Professor Stefan Grimm killed himself after confiding in fellow
academics
The toxicology scientist, 52, had been researching 'anti-cancer gene'
Imperial College bosses had told him he was not attracting enough grants
The institution is consistently ranked among the best in the world
A scientist pioneering a new cancer treatment at world-renowned Imperial
College London has been found dead after bosses told him to raise more money.
Professor Stefan Grimm apparently gassed himself at home after confiding in
fellow academics that university chiefs had treated him ‘like s***’.
In a final email, he wrote: ‘What these guys don’t know is that they
destroy lives. Well, they certainly destroyed mine.
‘This is not a university anymore but a business, with a very few, up in
the hierarchy, profiteering, and the rest of us milked for money.’
The 52-year-old professor of toxicology, who had been researching an ‘anti-
cancer gene’, was discovered dead in his house after his bosses told him he
was not bringing in enough money from academic grants.
An
email sent by Martin Wilkins, head of experimental medicine, to Prof Grimm
earlier this year stated he was ‘struggling’ to meet expectations and
needed to win research grants worth £200,000 a year.
He wrote: ‘This constitutes the start of informal action in relation to
your performance,’ and offered to ‘help’ if Prof Grimm wished to ‘
explore opportunities elsewhere’.
Prof Grimm sent an email to colleagues entitled ‘How Professors are treated
at Imperial College’ claiming that he had been living under the threat of
the sack for more than a year.
In the email, only discovered since his death on September 25, he wrote: ‘
Why does a Professor have to be treated like that? These career scientists
up in the hierarchy of this organisation only look at figures to judge their
colleagues.’
Saying he had accomplished ‘something exciting’ in the field of anti-
cancer genes, he wrote: ‘We have developed something that is probably much
more exciting than most other projects, including those that are heavily
supported by grants.
‘One of my colleagues here at the College whom I told my story looked at me
, there was a silence, and then said: “Yes, they treat us like s***”.’
Prof Grimm was unmarried and lived alone in a rented house in Harrow, North-
West London, where his next-door neighbour Norma Harrington, 84, said: ‘He
was very friendly, polite, gentle and diffident.
‘He went off to work at 7.30am and came home at 10pm – he said he was
always working.’
‘I noticed he had lost weight recently.
‘It is so sad that someone doing such good work should end up like this.’
Her husband, retired bank worker Jack Harrington, showed the Mail a note
from their neighbour apologising over a delay in paying for cleaning of
their joint driveway in which Prof Grimm wrote: ‘Sorry for my slow response
, it is a bit stressful in my job at the moment.’
Last night a fellow academic at Imperial said: ‘Perhaps what is most
shocking is that none of us are actually shocked this has happened.
‘Higher education is like big business these days, and Imperial is
absolutely focused on its position in the global rankings.
‘Lots of us thought academia was about ideas and expanding the realms of
science, not a business in which the people who do the research are treated
as disposable commodities.
‘Guys like Prof Grimm are victims in this. It is brutal and horrible and
unfair. Everybody knows a story about someone who has been targeted because
they no longer “fit” or are deemed unproductive in some way.’
Writing about Prof Grimm, science blogger Prof David Colquhoun said the
problem ‘is by no means limited to Imperial’ and said several other top
universities were ‘just as brutal - but in these places nobody has died.
Not yet’.
Professor Dermot Kelleher, Dean of the Faculty of Medicine at Imperial, told
staff in an email: ‘We are all deeply saddened by Stefan’s death and my
thoughts are with all those who knew him.’
He said an obituary being prepared told of ‘a scientific life well lived, a
phenomenally hard worker, a leader and inspiration to other scientists and
a caring man dedicated to his students.’
An inquest was opened and adjourned at West London District Coroner’s Court
on October 8.
Yesterday a spokesman for Imperial College London disputed Prof Grimm's
claim he had been threatened with the sack, and said the matter had been at
an informal stage, adding: 'His line manager met with him on a number of
occasions to see how the College could help him to develop more competitive
grant applications.
'Discussions included talking about the best place for him to do his science
, both inside Imperial and outside, and it is a fact that, with Professor
Grimm’s permission, his line manager made enquiries about opportunities on
his behalf.
'Stefan Grimm was a valued member of the Faculty of Medicine and news of his
death came as a great shock to colleagues.'
The university is conducting its own review to see if there were any '
lessons to be drawn'.
Professor James Stirling, Provost of Imperial College London, said: '
Imperial seeks to give every member of its community the opportunity to
excel and to create a supportive environment in which their careers may
flourish. Where we become aware that the College is falling short of this
standard of support to its members, we will act.'
Professor found dead after cash row: Cancer scientist said to have told
fellow academics that chiefs treated him 'like s***'
Professor Stefan Grimm killed himself after confiding in fellow
academics
The toxicology scientist, 52, had been researching 'anti-cancer gene'
Imperial College bosses had told him he was not attracting enough grants
The institution is consistently ranked among the best in the world
A scientist pioneering a new cancer treatment at world-renowned Imperial
College London has been found dead after bosses told him to raise more money.
Professor Stefan Grimm apparently gassed himself at home after confiding in
fellow academics that university chiefs had treated him ‘like s***’.
In a final email, he wrote: ‘What these guys don’t know is that they
destroy lives. Well, they certainly destroyed mine.
‘This is not a university anymore but a business, with a very few, up in
the hierarchy, profiteering, and the rest of us milked for money.’
The 52-year-old professor of toxicology, who had been researching an ‘anti-
cancer gene’, was discovered dead in his house after his bosses told him he
was not bringing in enough money from academic grants.
An
email sent by Martin Wilkins, head of experimental medicine, to Prof Grimm
earlier this year stated he was ‘struggling’ to meet expectations and
needed to win research grants worth £200,000 a year.
He wrote: ‘This constitutes the start of informal action in relation to
your performance,’ and offered to ‘help’ if Prof Grimm wished to ‘
explore opportunities elsewhere’.
Prof Grimm sent an email to colleagues entitled ‘How Professors are treated
at Imperial College’ claiming that he had been living under the threat of
the sack for more than a year.
In the email, only discovered since his death on September 25, he wrote: ‘
Why does a Professor have to be treated like that? These career scientists
up in the hierarchy of this organisation only look at figures to judge their
colleagues.’
Saying he had accomplished ‘something exciting’ in the field of anti-
cancer genes, he wrote: ‘We have developed something that is probably much
more exciting than most other projects, including those that are heavily
supported by grants.
‘One of my colleagues here at the College whom I told my story looked at me
, there was a silence, and then said: “Yes, they treat us like s***”.’
Prof Grimm was unmarried and lived alone in a rented house in Harrow, North-
West London, where his next-door neighbour Norma Harrington, 84, said: ‘He
was very friendly, polite, gentle and diffident.
‘He went off to work at 7.30am and came home at 10pm – he said he was
always working.’
‘I noticed he had lost weight recently.
‘It is so sad that someone doing such good work should end up like this.’
Her husband, retired bank worker Jack Harrington, showed the Mail a note
from their neighbour apologising over a delay in paying for cleaning of
their joint driveway in which Prof Grimm wrote: ‘Sorry for my slow response
, it is a bit stressful in my job at the moment.’
Last night a fellow academic at Imperial said: ‘Perhaps what is most
shocking is that none of us are actually shocked this has happened.
‘Higher education is like big business these days, and Imperial is
absolutely focused on its position in the global rankings.
‘Lots of us thought academia was about ideas and expanding the realms of
science, not a business in which the people who do the research are treated
as disposable commodities.
‘Guys like Prof Grimm are victims in this. It is brutal and horrible and
unfair. Everybody knows a story about someone who has been targeted because
they no longer “fit” or are deemed unproductive in some way.’
Writing about Prof Grimm, science blogger Prof David Colquhoun said the
problem ‘is by no means limited to Imperial’ and said several other top
universities were ‘just as brutal - but in these places nobody has died.
Not yet’.
Professor Dermot Kelleher, Dean of the Faculty of Medicine at Imperial, told
staff in an email: ‘We are all deeply saddened by Stefan’s death and my
thoughts are with all those who knew him.’
He said an obituary being prepared told of ‘a scientific life well lived, a
phenomenally hard worker, a leader and inspiration to other scientists and
a caring man dedicated to his students.’
An inquest was opened and adjourned at West London District Coroner’s Court
on October 8.
Yesterday a spokesman for Imperial College London disputed Prof Grimm's
claim he had been threatened with the sack, and said the matter had been at
an informal stage, adding: 'His line manager met with him on a number of
occasions to see how the College could help him to develop more competitive
grant applications.
'Discussions included talking about the best place for him to do his science
, both inside Imperial and outside, and it is a fact that, with Professor
Grimm’s permission, his line manager made enquiries about opportunities on
his behalf.
'Stefan Grimm was a valued member of the Faculty of Medicine and news of his
death came as a great shock to colleagues.'
The university is conducting its own review to see if there were any '
lessons to be drawn'.
Professor James Stirling, Provost of Imperial College London, said: '
Imperial seeks to give every member of its community the opportunity to
excel and to create a supportive environment in which their careers may
flourish. Where we become aware that the College is falling short of this
standard of support to its members, we will act.'
G*i
4 楼
只有你当前有合法身份
就可以在境内转身份
不需要出境激活
【在 x****h 的大作中提到】
: 还是在美国这边转就可以了?
: 另外如果将来F2找到工作了要转H1B是不是必须回国激活？
: 谢谢！
就可以在境内转身份
不需要出境激活
【在 x****h 的大作中提到】
: 还是在美国这边转就可以了?
: 另外如果将来F2找到工作了要转H1B是不是必须回国激活？
: 谢谢！
L*g
5 楼
再去看看砌墙的板砖是不是也中国产的
f*4
6 楼
Statement on Professor Stefan Grimm
http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/newsandeventspggrp/imperialcollege/n
Members of Imperial's community may be aware of media reports of the tragic
loss of Stefan Grimm, professor of toxicology in the Faculty of Medicine.
Professor Grimm’s work identified genes and proteins that regulate the
survival of cells, and may in the future help improve our understanding of
cancer. He was a valued member of the Faculty of Medicine, highly respected
by colleagues and students.
The news of Professor Grimm’s death at the end of September came as a great
shock to the College community. Senior colleagues have offered their
deepest condolences to Stefan’s family on behalf of the College, and extend
those to everyone affected by this tragedy.
The statutory authorities are investigating Professor Grimm’s death and the
College will continue to provide all the assistance it can.
Contrary to claims appearing on the internet, Professor Grimm’s work was
not under formal review nor had he been given any notice of dismissal. It is
standard practice at Imperial to conduct both informal and formal
performance management. Professor Grimm’s line manager met with him on a
number of occasions to see how the College could help him to develop more
competitive grant applications, for example through internal peer-review,
collaborations and letters of support. Discussions included talking about
the best place for him to do his science, both inside Imperial and outside,
and, with Professor Grimm’s permission, his line manager made enquiries
about opportunities on his behalf.
As with all serious and tragic events involving staff or students, the
College conducts appropriate reviews in order to see whether wider lessons
may be drawn. Last month, following Professor Grimm’s death, Imperial’s
Provost tasked the Director of HR and one of the College’s senior elected
academic representatives to review relevant College policies, procedures and
the support available to staff. Their report will be considered by a senior
group led by the Provost and the College will move swiftly to implement any
recommendations.
Members of the community will be informed of the outcomes of the review in
early 2015, and comments will be invited on the College’s proposed response
.
Professor James Stirling CBE FRS, Provost of Imperial College London, said:
“Imperial seeks to give every member of its community the opportunity to
excel and to create a supportive environment in which their careers may
flourish. Where we become aware that the College is falling short of this
standard of support to its members, we will act.”
Staff and students are reminded of the resources available to them offering
support with personal or work issues – please see details in the sidebar (
right).
http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/newsandeventspggrp/imperialcollege/n
Members of Imperial's community may be aware of media reports of the tragic
loss of Stefan Grimm, professor of toxicology in the Faculty of Medicine.
Professor Grimm’s work identified genes and proteins that regulate the
survival of cells, and may in the future help improve our understanding of
cancer. He was a valued member of the Faculty of Medicine, highly respected
by colleagues and students.
The news of Professor Grimm’s death at the end of September came as a great
shock to the College community. Senior colleagues have offered their
deepest condolences to Stefan’s family on behalf of the College, and extend
those to everyone affected by this tragedy.
The statutory authorities are investigating Professor Grimm’s death and the
College will continue to provide all the assistance it can.
Contrary to claims appearing on the internet, Professor Grimm’s work was
not under formal review nor had he been given any notice of dismissal. It is
standard practice at Imperial to conduct both informal and formal
performance management. Professor Grimm’s line manager met with him on a
number of occasions to see how the College could help him to develop more
competitive grant applications, for example through internal peer-review,
collaborations and letters of support. Discussions included talking about
the best place for him to do his science, both inside Imperial and outside,
and, with Professor Grimm’s permission, his line manager made enquiries
about opportunities on his behalf.
As with all serious and tragic events involving staff or students, the
College conducts appropriate reviews in order to see whether wider lessons
may be drawn. Last month, following Professor Grimm’s death, Imperial’s
Provost tasked the Director of HR and one of the College’s senior elected
academic representatives to review relevant College policies, procedures and
the support available to staff. Their report will be considered by a senior
group led by the Provost and the College will move swiftly to implement any
recommendations.
Members of the community will be informed of the outcomes of the review in
early 2015, and comments will be invited on the College’s proposed response
.
Professor James Stirling CBE FRS, Provost of Imperial College London, said:
“Imperial seeks to give every member of its community the opportunity to
excel and to create a supportive environment in which their careers may
flourish. Where we become aware that the College is falling short of this
standard of support to its members, we will act.”
Staff and students are reminded of the resources available to them offering
support with personal or work issues – please see details in the sidebar (
right).
p*p
7 楼
中国的锁匠都一分钟开锁，对本新闻表示深度怀疑
f*4
8 楼
http://www.dcscience.net/2007/08/03/how-should-universities-be-
Dear Colleagues,
You may have already heard about the tragic death of Professor Stefan Grimm
a former member of the Faculty of Medicine at Imperial College. He died
suddenly and unexpectedly in early October. As yet there is no report about
the cause of his death. Some two weeks later a delayed email from him was
received by many of the senior staff of the medical school, and other
researchers worldwide. It has been forwarded to me by one of my research
collaborators. From my reading of it I believe that Stefan wanted it
circulated as widely as possible and for that reason I am sending it to you.
It is appended below.
This email represents just one side of an acrimonious dispute, but it may be
indicative of more deep seated problems.
best wishes
Begin forwarded message:
From: Stefan Grimm /* */>
Date: 21 October 2014 23:41:03 BST
To:
Subject: How Professors are treated at Imperial College
Dear all,
If anyone is interested how Professors are treated at Imperial College: Here
is my story.
On May 30th ’13 my boss, Prof Martin Wilkins, came into my office together
with his PA and ask me what grants I had. After I enumerated them I was told
that this was not enough and that I had to leave the College within one
year – “max” as he said. He made it clear that he was acting on behalf of
Prof Gavin Screaton, the then head of the Department of Medicine, and told
me that I would have a meeting with him soon to be sacked. Without any
further comment he left my office. It was only then that I realized that he
did not even have the courtesy to close the door of my office when he
delivered this message. When I turned around the corner I saw a student who
seems to have overheard the conversation looking at me in utter horror.
Prof Wilkins had nothing better to do than immediately inform my colleagues
in the Section that he had just sacked me.
Why does a Professor have to be treated like that?
All my grant writing stopped afterwards, as I was waiting for the meeting to
get sacked by Prof Screaton. This meeting, however, never took place.
In March ’14 I then received the ultimatum email below. 200,000 pounds
research income every year is required. Very interesting. I was never
informed about this before and cannot remember that this is part of my
contract with the College. Especially interesting is the fact that the
required 200,000.- pounds could potentially also be covered by smaller
grants but in my case a programme grant was expected.
Our 135,000.- pounds from the University of Dammam? Doesn’t count. I have
to say that it was a lovely situation to submit grant applications for your
own survival with such a deadline. We all know what a lottery grant
applications are.
There was talk that the Department had accepted to be in dept for some time
and would compensate this through more teaching. So I thought that I would
survive. But the email below indicates otherwise. I got this after the
student for whom I “have plans” received the official admission to the
College as a PhD student. He waited so long to work in our group and I will
never be able to tell him that this should now not happen. What these guys
don’t know is that they destroy lives. Well, they certainly destroyed mine.
The reality is that these career scientists up in the hierarchy of this
organization only look at figures to judge their colleagues, be it impact
factors or grant income. After all, how can you convince your Department
head that you are working on something exciting if he not even attends the
regular Departmental seminars? The aim is only to keep up the finances of
their Departments for their own career advancement.
These formidable leaders are playing an interesting game: They hire
scientists from other countries to submit the work that they did abroad
under completely different conditions for the Research Assessment that is
supposed to gauge the performance of British universities. Afterwards they
leave them alone to either perform with grants or being kicked out. Even if
your work is submitted to this Research Assessment and brings in money for
the university, you are targeted if your grant income is deemed insufficient
. Those submitted to the research assessment hence support those colleagues
who are unproductive but have grants. Grant income is all that counts here,
not scientific output.
We had four papers with original data this year so far, in Cell Death and
Differentiation, Oncogene, Journal of Cell Science and, as I informed Prof
Wilkins this week, one accepted with the EMBO Journal. I was also the editor
of a book and wrote two reviews. Doesn’t count.
This leads to a interesting spin to the old saying “publish or perish”.
Here it is “publish and perish”.
Did I regret coming to this place? I enormously enjoyed interacting with my
science colleagues here, but like many of them, I fell into the trap of
confusing the reputation of science here with the present reality. This is
not a university anymore but a business with very few up in the hierarchy,
like our formidable duo, profiteering and the rest of us are milked for
money, be it professors for their grant income or students who pay 100.-
pounds just to extend their write-up status.
If anyone believes that I feel what my excellent coworkers and I have
accomplished here over the years is inferior to other work, is wrong. With
our apoptosis genes and the concept of Anticancer Genes we have developed
something that is probably much more exciting than most other projects,
including those that are heavily supported by grants.
Was I perhaps too lazy? My boss smugly told me that I was actually the one
professor on the whole campus who had submitted the highest number of grant
applications. Well, they were probably simply not good enough.
I am by far not the only one who is targeted by those formidable guys. These
colleagues only keep quiet out of shame about their situation. Which is
wrong. As we all know hitting the sweet spot in bioscience is simply a
matter of luck, both for grant applications and publications.
Why does a Professor have to be treated like that?
One of my colleagues here at the College whom I told my story looked at me,
there was a silence, and then said: “Yes, they treat us like sh*t”.
Best regards,
Stefan Grimm
Dear Colleagues,
You may have already heard about the tragic death of Professor Stefan Grimm
a former member of the Faculty of Medicine at Imperial College. He died
suddenly and unexpectedly in early October. As yet there is no report about
the cause of his death. Some two weeks later a delayed email from him was
received by many of the senior staff of the medical school, and other
researchers worldwide. It has been forwarded to me by one of my research
collaborators. From my reading of it I believe that Stefan wanted it
circulated as widely as possible and for that reason I am sending it to you.
It is appended below.
This email represents just one side of an acrimonious dispute, but it may be
indicative of more deep seated problems.
best wishes
Begin forwarded message:
From: Stefan Grimm /* */>
Date: 21 October 2014 23:41:03 BST
To:
Subject: How Professors are treated at Imperial College
Dear all,
If anyone is interested how Professors are treated at Imperial College: Here
is my story.
On May 30th ’13 my boss, Prof Martin Wilkins, came into my office together
with his PA and ask me what grants I had. After I enumerated them I was told
that this was not enough and that I had to leave the College within one
year – “max” as he said. He made it clear that he was acting on behalf of
Prof Gavin Screaton, the then head of the Department of Medicine, and told
me that I would have a meeting with him soon to be sacked. Without any
further comment he left my office. It was only then that I realized that he
did not even have the courtesy to close the door of my office when he
delivered this message. When I turned around the corner I saw a student who
seems to have overheard the conversation looking at me in utter horror.
Prof Wilkins had nothing better to do than immediately inform my colleagues
in the Section that he had just sacked me.
Why does a Professor have to be treated like that?
All my grant writing stopped afterwards, as I was waiting for the meeting to
get sacked by Prof Screaton. This meeting, however, never took place.
In March ’14 I then received the ultimatum email below. 200,000 pounds
research income every year is required. Very interesting. I was never
informed about this before and cannot remember that this is part of my
contract with the College. Especially interesting is the fact that the
required 200,000.- pounds could potentially also be covered by smaller
grants but in my case a programme grant was expected.
Our 135,000.- pounds from the University of Dammam? Doesn’t count. I have
to say that it was a lovely situation to submit grant applications for your
own survival with such a deadline. We all know what a lottery grant
applications are.
There was talk that the Department had accepted to be in dept for some time
and would compensate this through more teaching. So I thought that I would
survive. But the email below indicates otherwise. I got this after the
student for whom I “have plans” received the official admission to the
College as a PhD student. He waited so long to work in our group and I will
never be able to tell him that this should now not happen. What these guys
don’t know is that they destroy lives. Well, they certainly destroyed mine.
The reality is that these career scientists up in the hierarchy of this
organization only look at figures to judge their colleagues, be it impact
factors or grant income. After all, how can you convince your Department
head that you are working on something exciting if he not even attends the
regular Departmental seminars? The aim is only to keep up the finances of
their Departments for their own career advancement.
These formidable leaders are playing an interesting game: They hire
scientists from other countries to submit the work that they did abroad
under completely different conditions for the Research Assessment that is
supposed to gauge the performance of British universities. Afterwards they
leave them alone to either perform with grants or being kicked out. Even if
your work is submitted to this Research Assessment and brings in money for
the university, you are targeted if your grant income is deemed insufficient
. Those submitted to the research assessment hence support those colleagues
who are unproductive but have grants. Grant income is all that counts here,
not scientific output.
We had four papers with original data this year so far, in Cell Death and
Differentiation, Oncogene, Journal of Cell Science and, as I informed Prof
Wilkins this week, one accepted with the EMBO Journal. I was also the editor
of a book and wrote two reviews. Doesn’t count.
This leads to a interesting spin to the old saying “publish or perish”.
Here it is “publish and perish”.
Did I regret coming to this place? I enormously enjoyed interacting with my
science colleagues here, but like many of them, I fell into the trap of
confusing the reputation of science here with the present reality. This is
not a university anymore but a business with very few up in the hierarchy,
like our formidable duo, profiteering and the rest of us are milked for
money, be it professors for their grant income or students who pay 100.-
pounds just to extend their write-up status.
If anyone believes that I feel what my excellent coworkers and I have
accomplished here over the years is inferior to other work, is wrong. With
our apoptosis genes and the concept of Anticancer Genes we have developed
something that is probably much more exciting than most other projects,
including those that are heavily supported by grants.
Was I perhaps too lazy? My boss smugly told me that I was actually the one
professor on the whole campus who had submitted the highest number of grant
applications. Well, they were probably simply not good enough.
I am by far not the only one who is targeted by those formidable guys. These
colleagues only keep quiet out of shame about their situation. Which is
wrong. As we all know hitting the sweet spot in bioscience is simply a
matter of luck, both for grant applications and publications.
Why does a Professor have to be treated like that?
One of my colleagues here at the College whom I told my story looked at me,
there was a silence, and then said: “Yes, they treat us like sh*t”.
Best regards,
Stefan Grimm
p*p
9 楼
另外，里面住人，从外面用铁挂锁锁上，技术上如何实现？
p*n
10 楼
I feel sad. Anyway, RIP.
Grimm
about
you.
【在 f***4 的大作中提到】
: http://www.dcscience.net/2007/08/03/how-should-universities-be-
: Dear Colleagues,
: You may have already heard about the tragic death of Professor Stefan Grimm
: a former member of the Faculty of Medicine at Imperial College. He died
: suddenly and unexpectedly in early October. As yet there is no report about
: the cause of his death. Some two weeks later a delayed email from him was
: received by many of the senior staff of the medical school, and other
: researchers worldwide. It has been forwarded to me by one of my research
: collaborators. From my reading of it I believe that Stefan wanted it
: circulated as widely as possible and for that reason I am sending it to you.
Grimm
about
you.
【在 f***4 的大作中提到】
: http://www.dcscience.net/2007/08/03/how-should-universities-be-
: Dear Colleagues,
: You may have already heard about the tragic death of Professor Stefan Grimm
: a former member of the Faculty of Medicine at Imperial College. He died
: suddenly and unexpectedly in early October. As yet there is no report about
: the cause of his death. Some two weeks later a delayed email from him was
: received by many of the senior staff of the medical school, and other
: researchers worldwide. It has been forwarded to me by one of my research
: collaborators. From my reading of it I believe that Stefan wanted it
: circulated as widely as possible and for that reason I am sending it to you.
C*g
11 楼
这也说明拉登住处其实是有地道通向外面的。
从外面把大门锁上，这样别人就会认为里面是空的。
过去国内也有在门上锁一把挂锁，然后把门连门框打开进去再把门合上，小偷以为既然
门上锁着明锁，里面肯定没人，于是撬锁而入，被逮个正着。
【在 p*****p 的大作中提到】
: 另外，里面住人，从外面用铁挂锁锁上，技术上如何实现？
从外面把大门锁上，这样别人就会认为里面是空的。
过去国内也有在门上锁一把挂锁，然后把门连门框打开进去再把门合上，小偷以为既然
门上锁着明锁，里面肯定没人，于是撬锁而入，被逮个正着。
【在 p*****p 的大作中提到】
: 另外，里面住人，从外面用铁挂锁锁上，技术上如何实现？
j*r
12 楼
RIP
p*e
13 楼
窃以为问题在于米军的开锁工具是英制，锁头是公制，
【在 m**d 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Detective 讨论区 】
: 发信人: mind (mind), 信区: Detective
: 标 题: 国产门锁成功阻碍美特种部队快速破门抓捕企图
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 7 08:28:02 2011, 美东)
: 据外电报道，美海豹突击队在抓捕拉登过程中，意外发现拉登住处大院使用国产门锁，
: 使用多种手段均无法打开，从而被迫翻墙进入。美方有关人士表示，如能顺利打开门锁
: ，抓捕行动至少可以缩短15分钟以上。
【在 m**d 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Detective 讨论区 】
: 发信人: mind (mind), 信区: Detective
: 标 题: 国产门锁成功阻碍美特种部队快速破门抓捕企图
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 7 08:28:02 2011, 美东)
: 据外电报道，美海豹突击队在抓捕拉登过程中，意外发现拉登住处大院使用国产门锁，
: 使用多种手段均无法打开，从而被迫翻墙进入。美方有关人士表示，如能顺利打开门锁
: ，抓捕行动至少可以缩短15分钟以上。
V*t
14 楼
抑郁症吧
grants
money.
【在 f***4 的大作中提到】
: http://www.dcscience.net/2007/08/03/how-should-universities-be-
: Dear Colleagues,
: You may have already heard about the tragic death of Professor Stefan Grimm
: a former member of the Faculty of Medicine at Imperial College. He died
: suddenly and unexpectedly in early October. As yet there is no report about
: the cause of his death. Some two weeks later a delayed email from him was
: received by many of the senior staff of the medical school, and other
: researchers worldwide. It has been forwarded to me by one of my research
: collaborators. From my reading of it I believe that Stefan wanted it
: circulated as widely as possible and for that reason I am sending it to you.
grants
money.
【在 f***4 的大作中提到】
: http://www.dcscience.net/2007/08/03/how-should-universities-be-
: Dear Colleagues,
: You may have already heard about the tragic death of Professor Stefan Grimm
: a former member of the Faculty of Medicine at Imperial College. He died
: suddenly and unexpectedly in early October. As yet there is no report about
: the cause of his death. Some two weeks later a delayed email from him was
: received by many of the senior staff of the medical school, and other
: researchers worldwide. It has been forwarded to me by one of my research
: collaborators. From my reading of it I believe that Stefan wanted it
: circulated as widely as possible and for that reason I am sending it to you.
p*e
15 楼
门卫晚上下班锁门回家，早晨上班开门。
【在 p*****p 的大作中提到】
: 另外，里面住人，从外面用铁挂锁锁上，技术上如何实现？
【在 p*****p 的大作中提到】
: 另外，里面住人，从外面用铁挂锁锁上，技术上如何实现？
F*Q
16 楼
常年生活在巨大的压力之下，正常人也会出问题，心理脆弱的出的问题更大。
【在 V******t 的大作中提到】
: 抑郁症吧
:
: grants
: money.
【在 V******t 的大作中提到】
: 抑郁症吧
:
: grants
: money.
o*1
17 楼
这个坑挖得不好。现在美军的标准单兵装备随时随地搞掉这种锁不成问题，
何况是特种部队。
http://img.club.pchome.net/upload/club/other/2011/5/7/pics_pcho
91.jpg
【在 m**d 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Detective 讨论区 】
: 发信人: mind (mind), 信区: Detective
: 标 题: 国产门锁成功阻碍美特种部队快速破门抓捕企图
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 7 08:28:02 2011, 美东)
: 据外电报道，美海豹突击队在抓捕拉登过程中，意外发现拉登住处大院使用国产门锁，
: 使用多种手段均无法打开，从而被迫翻墙进入。美方有关人士表示，如能顺利打开门锁
: ，抓捕行动至少可以缩短15分钟以上。
何况是特种部队。
http://img.club.pchome.net/upload/club/other/2011/5/7/pics_pcho
91.jpg
【在 m**d 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Detective 讨论区 】
: 发信人: mind (mind), 信区: Detective
: 标 题: 国产门锁成功阻碍美特种部队快速破门抓捕企图
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 7 08:28:02 2011, 美东)
: 据外电报道，美海豹突击队在抓捕拉登过程中，意外发现拉登住处大院使用国产门锁，
: 使用多种手段均无法打开，从而被迫翻墙进入。美方有关人士表示，如能顺利打开门锁
: ，抓捕行动至少可以缩短15分钟以上。
s*y
18 楼
你先把他的信看完吧。下面是他自己对相关事情的说法。很明显，是校方逼
他一定要拿到某某数量以上的外来资金，而且要每年200，000英镑，这个
相当于一个半到两个R01的数量了，在英国是非常难以办到的。拿不到这个
钱就要走人。很明显，他没有达到校方的要求。新闻报道里还有一句话说是
“校方在取得他的同意之下为他咨询了其他地方的职位”， 这个其实就是
很含蓄的说，校方已经开动了开除他的手续了。这个还是很吓人的，他作为
一个正教授，居然就这么被扫地出门，所以他是被气死的吧。
On May 30th ’13 my boss, Prof Martin Wilkins, came into my office together
with his PA and ask me what grants I had. After I enumerated them I was told
that this was not enough and that I had to leave the College within one
year – “max” as he said. He made it clear that he was acting on behalf of
Prof Gavin Screaton, the then head of the Department of Medicine, and told
me that I would have a meeting with him soon to be sacked. Without any
【在 V******t 的大作中提到】
: 抑郁症吧
:
: grants
: money.
p*p
19 楼
门卫现在抓到了没?
【在 p*****e 的大作中提到】
: 门卫晚上下班锁门回家，早晨上班开门。
【在 p*****e 的大作中提到】
: 门卫晚上下班锁门回家，早晨上班开门。
D*a
20 楼
虽然挺令人唏嘘的，但是死了也真是不值得啊...
together
told
【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
:
: 你先把他的信看完吧。下面是他自己对相关事情的说法。很明显，是校方逼
: 他一定要拿到某某数量以上的外来资金，而且要每年200，000英镑，这个
: 相当于一个半到两个R01的数量了，在英国是非常难以办到的。拿不到这个
: 钱就要走人。很明显，他没有达到校方的要求。新闻报道里还有一句话说是
: “校方在取得他的同意之下为他咨询了其他地方的职位”， 这个其实就是
: 很含蓄的说，校方已经开动了开除他的手续了。这个还是很吓人的，他作为
: 一个正教授，居然就这么被扫地出门，所以他是被气死的吧。
: On May 30th ’13 my boss, Prof Martin Wilkins, came into my office together
: with his PA and ask me what grants I had. After I enumerated them I was told
together
told
【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
:
: 你先把他的信看完吧。下面是他自己对相关事情的说法。很明显，是校方逼
: 他一定要拿到某某数量以上的外来资金，而且要每年200，000英镑，这个
: 相当于一个半到两个R01的数量了，在英国是非常难以办到的。拿不到这个
: 钱就要走人。很明显，他没有达到校方的要求。新闻报道里还有一句话说是
: “校方在取得他的同意之下为他咨询了其他地方的职位”， 这个其实就是
: 很含蓄的说，校方已经开动了开除他的手续了。这个还是很吓人的，他作为
: 一个正教授，居然就这么被扫地出门，所以他是被气死的吧。
: On May 30th ’13 my boss, Prof Martin Wilkins, came into my office together
: with his PA and ask me what grants I had. After I enumerated them I was told
w*s
21 楼
一般老百姓都是没在家的时候想让小偷觉得有人的吧，谁那么闲专门去抓小偷啊。
【在 C********g 的大作中提到】
: 这也说明拉登住处其实是有地道通向外面的。
: 从外面把大门锁上，这样别人就会认为里面是空的。
: 过去国内也有在门上锁一把挂锁，然后把门连门框打开进去再把门合上，小偷以为既然
: 门上锁着明锁，里面肯定没人，于是撬锁而入，被逮个正着。
【在 C********g 的大作中提到】
: 这也说明拉登住处其实是有地道通向外面的。
: 从外面把大门锁上，这样别人就会认为里面是空的。
: 过去国内也有在门上锁一把挂锁，然后把门连门框打开进去再把门合上，小偷以为既然
: 门上锁着明锁，里面肯定没人，于是撬锁而入，被逮个正着。
F*Q
22 楼
做学问做得太清高，宁为玉碎，不为瓦全啊。
他的一些同行的意思，学校那种运营方式下，出人命是迟早的事。
【在 D*a 的大作中提到】
: 虽然挺令人唏嘘的，但是死了也真是不值得啊...
:
: together
: told
他的一些同行的意思，学校那种运营方式下，出人命是迟早的事。
【在 D*a 的大作中提到】
: 虽然挺令人唏嘘的，但是死了也真是不值得啊...
:
: together
: told
C*g
23 楼
这个就是特殊的。
【在 w***s 的大作中提到】
: 一般老百姓都是没在家的时候想让小偷觉得有人的吧，谁那么闲专门去抓小偷啊。
【在 w***s 的大作中提到】
: 一般老百姓都是没在家的时候想让小偷觉得有人的吧，谁那么闲专门去抓小偷啊。
s*g
24 楼
人命搭上不值得，死脑筋阿。
t*l
25 楼
房东呢？跑掉啦
【在 m**d 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Detective 讨论区 】
: 发信人: mind (mind), 信区: Detective
: 标 题: 国产门锁成功阻碍美特种部队快速破门抓捕企图
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 7 08:28:02 2011, 美东)
: 据外电报道，美海豹突击队在抓捕拉登过程中，意外发现拉登住处大院使用国产门锁，
: 使用多种手段均无法打开，从而被迫翻墙进入。美方有关人士表示，如能顺利打开门锁
: ，抓捕行动至少可以缩短15分钟以上。
【在 m**d 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Detective 讨论区 】
: 发信人: mind (mind), 信区: Detective
: 标 题: 国产门锁成功阻碍美特种部队快速破门抓捕企图
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 7 08:28:02 2011, 美东)
: 据外电报道，美海豹突击队在抓捕拉登过程中，意外发现拉登住处大院使用国产门锁，
: 使用多种手段均无法打开，从而被迫翻墙进入。美方有关人士表示，如能顺利打开门锁
: ，抓捕行动至少可以缩短15分钟以上。
m*y
26 楼
"His line manager met with him on a number of occasions to see how the
College could help him to develop more competitive grant applications."
啧啧，还以为公司里才用line manager，Direct Report这种非常有损人格的词汇，怎
么帝国学院也这样？说好的学术自由呢？咋滴，tenure不好使啊？
College could help him to develop more competitive grant applications."
啧啧，还以为公司里才用line manager，Direct Report这种非常有损人格的词汇，怎
么帝国学院也这样？说好的学术自由呢？咋滴，tenure不好使啊？
d*f
27 楼
登哥这房子实在坑爹，就差没在门口挂个拉灯公寓的牌匾了，这样还要10年才找到，美
帝这情报能力还不如重庆朝天门派出所
【在 m**d 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Detective 讨论区 】
: 发信人: mind (mind), 信区: Detective
: 标 题: 国产门锁成功阻碍美特种部队快速破门抓捕企图
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 7 08:28:02 2011, 美东)
: 据外电报道，美海豹突击队在抓捕拉登过程中，意外发现拉登住处大院使用国产门锁，
: 使用多种手段均无法打开，从而被迫翻墙进入。美方有关人士表示，如能顺利打开门锁
: ，抓捕行动至少可以缩短15分钟以上。
帝这情报能力还不如重庆朝天门派出所
【在 m**d 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Detective 讨论区 】
: 发信人: mind (mind), 信区: Detective
: 标 题: 国产门锁成功阻碍美特种部队快速破门抓捕企图
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 7 08:28:02 2011, 美东)
: 据外电报道，美海豹突击队在抓捕拉登过程中，意外发现拉登住处大院使用国产门锁，
: 使用多种手段均无法打开，从而被迫翻墙进入。美方有关人士表示，如能顺利打开门锁
: ，抓捕行动至少可以缩短15分钟以上。
m*y
28 楼
很多学校也是招两个，留一个吧，只是不给正教授这么的title。还是说他这个正教授
跟巴马的那个一样，其实也是讲师级别的。
遗书里提到contract，大概没有tenure
together
told
【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
:
: 你先把他的信看完吧。下面是他自己对相关事情的说法。很明显，是校方逼
: 他一定要拿到某某数量以上的外来资金，而且要每年200，000英镑，这个
: 相当于一个半到两个R01的数量了，在英国是非常难以办到的。拿不到这个
: 钱就要走人。很明显，他没有达到校方的要求。新闻报道里还有一句话说是
: “校方在取得他的同意之下为他咨询了其他地方的职位”， 这个其实就是
: 很含蓄的说，校方已经开动了开除他的手续了。这个还是很吓人的，他作为
: 一个正教授，居然就这么被扫地出门，所以他是被气死的吧。
: On May 30th ’13 my boss, Prof Martin Wilkins, came into my office together
: with his PA and ask me what grants I had. After I enumerated them I was told
跟巴马的那个一样，其实也是讲师级别的。
遗书里提到contract，大概没有tenure
together
told
【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
:
: 你先把他的信看完吧。下面是他自己对相关事情的说法。很明显，是校方逼
: 他一定要拿到某某数量以上的外来资金，而且要每年200，000英镑，这个
: 相当于一个半到两个R01的数量了，在英国是非常难以办到的。拿不到这个
: 钱就要走人。很明显，他没有达到校方的要求。新闻报道里还有一句话说是
: “校方在取得他的同意之下为他咨询了其他地方的职位”， 这个其实就是
: 很含蓄的说，校方已经开动了开除他的手续了。这个还是很吓人的，他作为
: 一个正教授，居然就这么被扫地出门，所以他是被气死的吧。
: On May 30th ’13 my boss, Prof Martin Wilkins, came into my office together
: with his PA and ask me what grants I had. After I enumerated them I was told
w*s
29 楼
都是裁员裁的没了人手，懂阿拉伯语的都不多了，一直以为在巴基斯坦和阿富汗边境，
找啊找。
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: 登哥这房子实在坑爹，就差没在门口挂个拉灯公寓的牌匾了，这样还要10年才找到，美
: 帝这情报能力还不如重庆朝天门派出所
找啊找。
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: 登哥这房子实在坑爹，就差没在门口挂个拉灯公寓的牌匾了，这样还要10年才找到，美
: 帝这情报能力还不如重庆朝天门派出所
t*k
30 楼
英国的professor一般都是业内大佬吧，居然混到这种地步。。。
[在 mccoy (小强->大强->老强->强(jiang4)老) 的大作中提到：]
：很多学校也是招两个，留一个吧，只是不给正教授这么的title。还是说他这个正教授
：跟巴马的那个一样，其实也是讲师级别的。
：...........
[在 mccoy (小强->大强->老强->强(jiang4)老) 的大作中提到：]
：很多学校也是招两个，留一个吧，只是不给正教授这么的title。还是说他这个正教授
：跟巴马的那个一样，其实也是讲师级别的。
：...........
o*1
31 楼
这是有原因的。灯叔的逃亡分三个阶段。第一阶段，有大量的警卫和车辆，跑的时候浩
浩荡荡。结果一下子就被美帝的无人机发现拍了照。第二阶段，住山洞。巴基斯坦警察
已经封了这样的一个山洞。第三个阶段，估计灯叔实在受不了当山顶洞人了，就找了个
相对繁华的小镇隐居。这也是有讲究的。所谓大隐于朝，中隐于市，小隐于野。大隐，
灯叔是做不到了。小隐就是蹲山洞，受不了。就弄了个中隐。十年来好多次都差点挂了
，因为巴政府有内鬼，每次都跑掉。美帝实在受不了了，这次以入侵的方式，事先没给
巴政府打招呼，这才砍了他。
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: 登哥这房子实在坑爹，就差没在门口挂个拉灯公寓的牌匾了，这样还要10年才找到，美
: 帝这情报能力还不如重庆朝天门派出所
浩荡荡。结果一下子就被美帝的无人机发现拍了照。第二阶段，住山洞。巴基斯坦警察
已经封了这样的一个山洞。第三个阶段，估计灯叔实在受不了当山顶洞人了，就找了个
相对繁华的小镇隐居。这也是有讲究的。所谓大隐于朝，中隐于市，小隐于野。大隐，
灯叔是做不到了。小隐就是蹲山洞，受不了。就弄了个中隐。十年来好多次都差点挂了
，因为巴政府有内鬼，每次都跑掉。美帝实在受不了了，这次以入侵的方式，事先没给
巴政府打招呼，这才砍了他。
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: 登哥这房子实在坑爹，就差没在门口挂个拉灯公寓的牌匾了，这样还要10年才找到，美
: 帝这情报能力还不如重庆朝天门派出所
f*4
32 楼
英国本来讲师以上都是tenure的.但是最近尤其是去年REF以来,以帝国理工,Kings,QM,
warwick为例,是看给学校能搞到多少钱.否则教授也会被赶走.Kings去年夏天有名的
sacking summer....
医学院尤其严重,因为英国很多大学让临床大夫接任学校/学院/系的领导,他们对基础研
究没有太大兴趣.激烈的冲突大都出现在这里.
每年20万英镑,在英国需要program grant才能达标.很难
【在 m***y 的大作中提到】
: 很多学校也是招两个，留一个吧，只是不给正教授这么的title。还是说他这个正教授
: 跟巴马的那个一样，其实也是讲师级别的。
: 遗书里提到contract，大概没有tenure
:
: together
: told
warwick为例,是看给学校能搞到多少钱.否则教授也会被赶走.Kings去年夏天有名的
sacking summer....
医学院尤其严重,因为英国很多大学让临床大夫接任学校/学院/系的领导,他们对基础研
究没有太大兴趣.激烈的冲突大都出现在这里.
每年20万英镑,在英国需要program grant才能达标.很难
【在 m***y 的大作中提到】
: 很多学校也是招两个，留一个吧，只是不给正教授这么的title。还是说他这个正教授
: 跟巴马的那个一样，其实也是讲师级别的。
: 遗书里提到contract，大概没有tenure
:
: together
: told
m*d
33 楼
本·拉登住宅的一处特写的门锁镜头 www.6park.com
近期，网上最热的新闻非美总统奥巴马宣布恐怖大亨本·拉登被击毙莫属，消息一出，
网上各种版本的拉登澄清记、复活记、复仇记等乱飞。在随后中央电视台播出的一段《
本·拉登被击毙现场大门紧锁》的新闻中，烟台老字号的三环锁竟离奇的“亮”了，网
友调侃：国货威武，竟然锁死了拉登。 www.6park.com
在央视新闻频道关于拉登被炸死宅子的最新播报中，画面至第 46秒时，细心的网友发
现大门处有一特写画面，上面竟是一把国货三环锁！一时间，“国货威武！”“拉登眼
光不错。”“恐怖大亨本·拉登死亡原因揭晓！”等调侃之声不断，众多网友围观。
www.6park.com
网友 lauren423留言：“望了望左边的衣柜，恩，我也用上名牌了……”网友四片
火腿肠：“我勒个去！！！国货威武！我也要去买三环锁，拉登都信任的大品牌啊……
”咆哮体跟上：“三环锁红了！有木有！！一辈子用中国独家生产誉满全球行销海外名
优产品榜上有名三环锁的已故阿拉伯裔恐怖主义首领拉登各种伤不起啊啊啊！！” www
.6park.com
烟台三环锁业发源于1930 年，是中国成立最早的制锁企业，历经八十多年光辉岁
月，由默默无闻的小五金作坊，发展成为国内外闻名的大型专业化制锁企业集团。公司
占地面积34.08万平方米，建筑面积15.13万平方米，职工3380人，其中工程技术人员
289名，从事质量工作人员137名。拥有全国锁具行业唯一的国家级技术开发中心。 www
.6park.com
。“我刚刚看过电视截屏画面，这把锁是型号为365的大号锁头，在巴基斯坦等中东地
区的售价，约折合人民币6元！”在接受YMG记者第一时间采访时，三环集团法律顾问孟
庆国对此肯定地说。 www.6park.com
www.6park.com
50年前巴国开始进口烟台锁 www.6park.com
在孟庆国看来，本·拉丹住宅的“铁将军”，挂得竟是烟台锁，其实并不稀奇：“五金
业界曾流行过一句话，‘有可口可乐的地方就有三环锁’，目前的锁具产品远销170多
个国家，三环配得上这一赞誉。” www.6park.com
“上世纪50年代，三环开始尝试出口，起初，一些建交的发达国家还不太认同，巴基斯
坦算是最早的海外客户了！”孟庆国说，本国轻工业不发达，大概是 1960年起采购三
环锁。 www.6park.com
单月进口曾达十几个货柜 www.6park.com
时至今天，巴基斯坦仍是三环挂锁的一大主要销售地，孟律师告诉记者，“该国进口最
高纪录，曾连续多年创下一个月进口十几个货柜、重达20吨重的挂锁。” www.6park.
com
那么，巴基斯坦人是通过什么渠道来采购的？“有在广交会上订货的，也有网上订购的
，还有相当部分采购商是通过义乌国际小商品交易市场来买我们的产品。”三环国际贸
易公司总经理高海东说。 www.6park.com
巴国假冒泛滥，买把真锁不易 www.6park.com
采访中，孟律师讲，“前年3月份，我在义乌市场调研时，遇到一位常年在此地采购货
物的巴基斯坦客商，此前，他曾表示要订购‘三环’锁，但最终他却正考虑改订别的牌
子的锁，并拿出准备订购的锁具样品，我一看就知道，这又是一个仿‘三环’的劣质锁
。 www.6park.com
孟庆国告诉记者，这些在国外市场上出现的仿冒、劣质锁，因其价格普遍比“三环锁”
低10%至20%，因此，无论“三环”怎么降价，这些仿冒锁都会跟进降价，价格总比“三
环”低。 www.6park.com
“我们在巴基斯坦等中东国家调研过，目前在这些国外市场销售的挂锁中，有近百个品
牌的锁具设计类似‘三环’，且质量低劣，还有20余种干脆就直接打着‘三环’的牌子
。特别是在中东、东非、南亚等‘三环’锁具的主要销售市场，这种现象十分普遍。”
孟庆国说。 www.6park.com
“如此说来，本·拉丹住宅挂到正品三环锁，其实并非易事？”面对调侃，孟庆国无奈
地苦笑着。 www.6park.c
【在 m**d 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Detective 讨论区 】
: 发信人: mind (mind), 信区: Detective
: 标 题: 国产门锁成功阻碍美特种部队快速破门抓捕企图
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 7 08:28:02 2011, 美东)
: 据外电报道，美海豹突击队在抓捕拉登过程中，意外发现拉登住处大院使用国产门锁，
: 使用多种手段均无法打开，从而被迫翻墙进入。美方有关人士表示，如能顺利打开门锁
: ，抓捕行动至少可以缩短15分钟以上。
近期，网上最热的新闻非美总统奥巴马宣布恐怖大亨本·拉登被击毙莫属，消息一出，
网上各种版本的拉登澄清记、复活记、复仇记等乱飞。在随后中央电视台播出的一段《
本·拉登被击毙现场大门紧锁》的新闻中，烟台老字号的三环锁竟离奇的“亮”了，网
友调侃：国货威武，竟然锁死了拉登。 www.6park.com
在央视新闻频道关于拉登被炸死宅子的最新播报中，画面至第 46秒时，细心的网友发
现大门处有一特写画面，上面竟是一把国货三环锁！一时间，“国货威武！”“拉登眼
光不错。”“恐怖大亨本·拉登死亡原因揭晓！”等调侃之声不断，众多网友围观。
www.6park.com
网友 lauren423留言：“望了望左边的衣柜，恩，我也用上名牌了……”网友四片
火腿肠：“我勒个去！！！国货威武！我也要去买三环锁，拉登都信任的大品牌啊……
”咆哮体跟上：“三环锁红了！有木有！！一辈子用中国独家生产誉满全球行销海外名
优产品榜上有名三环锁的已故阿拉伯裔恐怖主义首领拉登各种伤不起啊啊啊！！” www
.6park.com
烟台三环锁业发源于1930 年，是中国成立最早的制锁企业，历经八十多年光辉岁
月，由默默无闻的小五金作坊，发展成为国内外闻名的大型专业化制锁企业集团。公司
占地面积34.08万平方米，建筑面积15.13万平方米，职工3380人，其中工程技术人员
289名，从事质量工作人员137名。拥有全国锁具行业唯一的国家级技术开发中心。 www
.6park.com
。“我刚刚看过电视截屏画面，这把锁是型号为365的大号锁头，在巴基斯坦等中东地
区的售价，约折合人民币6元！”在接受YMG记者第一时间采访时，三环集团法律顾问孟
庆国对此肯定地说。 www.6park.com
www.6park.com
50年前巴国开始进口烟台锁 www.6park.com
在孟庆国看来，本·拉丹住宅的“铁将军”，挂得竟是烟台锁，其实并不稀奇：“五金
业界曾流行过一句话，‘有可口可乐的地方就有三环锁’，目前的锁具产品远销170多
个国家，三环配得上这一赞誉。” www.6park.com
“上世纪50年代，三环开始尝试出口，起初，一些建交的发达国家还不太认同，巴基斯
坦算是最早的海外客户了！”孟庆国说，本国轻工业不发达，大概是 1960年起采购三
环锁。 www.6park.com
单月进口曾达十几个货柜 www.6park.com
时至今天，巴基斯坦仍是三环挂锁的一大主要销售地，孟律师告诉记者，“该国进口最
高纪录，曾连续多年创下一个月进口十几个货柜、重达20吨重的挂锁。” www.6park.
com
那么，巴基斯坦人是通过什么渠道来采购的？“有在广交会上订货的，也有网上订购的
，还有相当部分采购商是通过义乌国际小商品交易市场来买我们的产品。”三环国际贸
易公司总经理高海东说。 www.6park.com
巴国假冒泛滥，买把真锁不易 www.6park.com
采访中，孟律师讲，“前年3月份，我在义乌市场调研时，遇到一位常年在此地采购货
物的巴基斯坦客商，此前，他曾表示要订购‘三环’锁，但最终他却正考虑改订别的牌
子的锁，并拿出准备订购的锁具样品，我一看就知道，这又是一个仿‘三环’的劣质锁
。 www.6park.com
孟庆国告诉记者，这些在国外市场上出现的仿冒、劣质锁，因其价格普遍比“三环锁”
低10%至20%，因此，无论“三环”怎么降价，这些仿冒锁都会跟进降价，价格总比“三
环”低。 www.6park.com
“我们在巴基斯坦等中东国家调研过，目前在这些国外市场销售的挂锁中，有近百个品
牌的锁具设计类似‘三环’，且质量低劣，还有20余种干脆就直接打着‘三环’的牌子
。特别是在中东、东非、南亚等‘三环’锁具的主要销售市场，这种现象十分普遍。”
孟庆国说。 www.6park.com
“如此说来，本·拉丹住宅挂到正品三环锁，其实并非易事？”面对调侃，孟庆国无奈
地苦笑着。 www.6park.c
【在 m**d 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Detective 讨论区 】
: 发信人: mind (mind), 信区: Detective
: 标 题: 国产门锁成功阻碍美特种部队快速破门抓捕企图
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 7 08:28:02 2011, 美东)
: 据外电报道，美海豹突击队在抓捕拉登过程中，意外发现拉登住处大院使用国产门锁，
: 使用多种手段均无法打开，从而被迫翻墙进入。美方有关人士表示，如能顺利打开门锁
: ，抓捕行动至少可以缩短15分钟以上。
f*4
34 楼
鱼同学曾经去帝国理工应聘过.是吧.
together
told
【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
:
: 你先把他的信看完吧。下面是他自己对相关事情的说法。很明显，是校方逼
: 他一定要拿到某某数量以上的外来资金，而且要每年200，000英镑，这个
: 相当于一个半到两个R01的数量了，在英国是非常难以办到的。拿不到这个
: 钱就要走人。很明显，他没有达到校方的要求。新闻报道里还有一句话说是
: “校方在取得他的同意之下为他咨询了其他地方的职位”， 这个其实就是
: 很含蓄的说，校方已经开动了开除他的手续了。这个还是很吓人的，他作为
: 一个正教授，居然就这么被扫地出门，所以他是被气死的吧。
: On May 30th ’13 my boss, Prof Martin Wilkins, came into my office together
: with his PA and ask me what grants I had. After I enumerated them I was told
together
told
【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
:
: 你先把他的信看完吧。下面是他自己对相关事情的说法。很明显，是校方逼
: 他一定要拿到某某数量以上的外来资金，而且要每年200，000英镑，这个
: 相当于一个半到两个R01的数量了，在英国是非常难以办到的。拿不到这个
: 钱就要走人。很明显，他没有达到校方的要求。新闻报道里还有一句话说是
: “校方在取得他的同意之下为他咨询了其他地方的职位”， 这个其实就是
: 很含蓄的说，校方已经开动了开除他的手续了。这个还是很吓人的，他作为
: 一个正教授，居然就这么被扫地出门，所以他是被气死的吧。
: On May 30th ’13 my boss, Prof Martin Wilkins, came into my office together
: with his PA and ask me what grants I had. After I enumerated them I was told
p*u
35 楼
搞不到钱的本来就应该走，留着浪费资源干吗？
做生物的搞不到钱基本就不可能有什么科研成果。
【在 f***4 的大作中提到】
: 英国本来讲师以上都是tenure的.但是最近尤其是去年REF以来,以帝国理工,Kings,QM,
: warwick为例,是看给学校能搞到多少钱.否则教授也会被赶走.Kings去年夏天有名的
: sacking summer....
: 医学院尤其严重,因为英国很多大学让临床大夫接任学校/学院/系的领导,他们对基础研
: 究没有太大兴趣.激烈的冲突大都出现在这里.
: 每年20万英镑,在英国需要program grant才能达标.很难
做生物的搞不到钱基本就不可能有什么科研成果。
【在 f***4 的大作中提到】
: 英国本来讲师以上都是tenure的.但是最近尤其是去年REF以来,以帝国理工,Kings,QM,
: warwick为例,是看给学校能搞到多少钱.否则教授也会被赶走.Kings去年夏天有名的
: sacking summer....
: 医学院尤其严重,因为英国很多大学让临床大夫接任学校/学院/系的领导,他们对基础研
: 究没有太大兴趣.激烈的冲突大都出现在这里.
: 每年20万英镑,在英国需要program grant才能达标.很难
A*y
36 楼
He has other grants. Apperently, these other grants don't count. Just like
if you want to be promoted in US medical school, you better have a R01.
Some department chairs will say DoD, NSF, ACS, and AHA won't help much. If
you are in top schools even with one R01 and one R21, you are still at
margin of being let go (I know someone who didn't get tenure like that in
one of Ivy schools with NCS and tons top publications).
【在 p****u 的大作中提到】
: 搞不到钱的本来就应该走，留着浪费资源干吗？
: 做生物的搞不到钱基本就不可能有什么科研成果。
if you want to be promoted in US medical school, you better have a R01.
Some department chairs will say DoD, NSF, ACS, and AHA won't help much. If
you are in top schools even with one R01 and one R21, you are still at
margin of being let go (I know someone who didn't get tenure like that in
one of Ivy schools with NCS and tons top publications).
【在 p****u 的大作中提到】
: 搞不到钱的本来就应该走，留着浪费资源干吗？
: 做生物的搞不到钱基本就不可能有什么科研成果。
F*Q
37 楼
做生物没钱没资源没人力是很难出大成果，但是没有谁敢说科研能力和搞钱的能力是正
比关系吧？
帝国理工的每年20万英镑的标准确实是够贱的。人家18万或者15万一年的科研产出就一
定比不上20万一年的产出？ FAQ当年在零经费的情况下在几个月的时间内利用上买卖提
的时间整出来的东西还推翻了教科书上教义呢。
FAQ认为，在学术界有人被吃，不是因为被吃的人的能力有问题，而是体制太草蛋，幸
存的人不一定是因为能力被被吃的人强而是因为运气好。
【在 p****u 的大作中提到】
: 搞不到钱的本来就应该走，留着浪费资源干吗？
: 做生物的搞不到钱基本就不可能有什么科研成果。
比关系吧？
帝国理工的每年20万英镑的标准确实是够贱的。人家18万或者15万一年的科研产出就一
定比不上20万一年的产出？ FAQ当年在零经费的情况下在几个月的时间内利用上买卖提
的时间整出来的东西还推翻了教科书上教义呢。
FAQ认为，在学术界有人被吃，不是因为被吃的人的能力有问题，而是体制太草蛋，幸
存的人不一定是因为能力被被吃的人强而是因为运气好。
【在 p****u 的大作中提到】
: 搞不到钱的本来就应该走，留着浪费资源干吗？
: 做生物的搞不到钱基本就不可能有什么科研成果。
p*u
38 楼
能力有什么用啊？这个世界只看结果，你能力再好没有配套资源没有成果对学校对社会
来说就是无用。
这个线怎么划是个trade off，放太低就学校要养一批无用的人，放太高就竞争很残酷。
【在 F*Q 的大作中提到】
: 做生物没钱没资源没人力是很难出大成果，但是没有谁敢说科研能力和搞钱的能力是正
: 比关系吧？
: 帝国理工的每年20万英镑的标准确实是够贱的。人家18万或者15万一年的科研产出就一
: 定比不上20万一年的产出？ FAQ当年在零经费的情况下在几个月的时间内利用上买卖提
: 的时间整出来的东西还推翻了教科书上教义呢。
: FAQ认为，在学术界有人被吃，不是因为被吃的人的能力有问题，而是体制太草蛋，幸
: 存的人不一定是因为能力被被吃的人强而是因为运气好。
来说就是无用。
这个线怎么划是个trade off，放太低就学校要养一批无用的人，放太高就竞争很残酷。
【在 F*Q 的大作中提到】
: 做生物没钱没资源没人力是很难出大成果，但是没有谁敢说科研能力和搞钱的能力是正
: 比关系吧？
: 帝国理工的每年20万英镑的标准确实是够贱的。人家18万或者15万一年的科研产出就一
: 定比不上20万一年的产出？ FAQ当年在零经费的情况下在几个月的时间内利用上买卖提
: 的时间整出来的东西还推翻了教科书上教义呢。
: FAQ认为，在学术界有人被吃，不是因为被吃的人的能力有问题，而是体制太草蛋，幸
: 存的人不一定是因为能力被被吃的人强而是因为运气好。
F*Q
39 楼
我好像在别的地方说过，现在的学术界就是被一群掌握资源的混蛋把持，那群混蛋认为
科研应该和加工厂一样按时批量出产成果。
用。
酷。
【在 p****u 的大作中提到】
: 能力有什么用啊？这个世界只看结果，你能力再好没有配套资源没有成果对学校对社会
: 来说就是无用。
: 这个线怎么划是个trade off，放太低就学校要养一批无用的人，放太高就竞争很残酷。
科研应该和加工厂一样按时批量出产成果。
用。
酷。
【在 p****u 的大作中提到】
: 能力有什么用啊？这个世界只看结果，你能力再好没有配套资源没有成果对学校对社会
: 来说就是无用。
: 这个线怎么划是个trade off，放太低就学校要养一批无用的人，放太高就竞争很残酷。
相关阅读
this forum is dead.求篇Industrial Biotechnology 上的paperPaper Help: Diabetes小哈说事儿单抗问题求教浙大生科院那事，越来越狗血了，吴平这个算不算学历造假？4名院士推荐人要求对涉嫌抄袭王院士除名请教一个细胞代数的问题问推荐信问题，谢谢！问一个 atcc wt hek 的问题用口吸管在96孔板里每孔seed一个细胞，可行吗？DC-CIK疗法对癌症治疗有效果吗？请帮忙下载2篇文章，多谢，多谢！请教，培美曲塞与紫杉醇针对肺癌中鳞癌、腺癌哪个效果更好？paper help想做几个免疫检测试剂盒，请教有做过cell-based的ELISA的吗？Sunney Xie评上method of the year求审稿机会推荐，并祝新年快乐急求推荐审稿机会！神经发育和遗传，疾病方向，先谢谢了！大家来说说，生物博后都是什么样的处境阿