Redian新闻
>
谁才是西游记中最强大的妖怪?雄霸一方,玉帝如来也忌惮三分(zz)
avatar
谁才是西游记中最强大的妖怪?雄霸一方,玉帝如来也忌惮三分(zz)# ChineseClassics - 中华古典文化
d*z
1
【 以下文字转载自 Stock 讨论区 】
发信人: dmjz (东门虎西门豹), 信区: Stock
标 题: Re: 大盘盘尾猛拉,估计明天又要跌回去吧
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jan 4 17:12:07 2016, 美东)
--------------------
基本正确。意味着短期谷底价已见,看涨。
但正因为是如此,华尔街次日多会砸盘。
砸盘就是为了吓唬和误导散户在谷底割肉。
散户一般会害怕砸盘而割肉,于是中计。
要看穿见底后MM砸盘的伎俩,并加以利用。
耐心等MM砸盘力度告罄的时刻,加码买进。
avatar
c*s
2
如果各方消息确切。 9月放开排期到2008年某个时候(这部分肯定批不了),同时分
流真实名额给EB3。
avatar
w*i
3
大鹏这个妖怪和别的妖怪不同, 他不仅有法力, 而且更有势力! 西游记中有势力的妖怪
只有那么几个, 在此之前, 我们已经分析了是牛魔王的势力最大, 但是牛魔王还不敢动
手打任何一个神仙, 哪怕是最低最小的土地公公。
因为大鹏他不是凡间之怪物, 所以地上的妖怪和他没有可比性。大鹏精的势力有多大呢
? 我们来看一下:
1) 首先, 他有一个国家。
大鹏精的地盘是狮驼国。狮驼国有多大呢? 由西至东, 先要走过八百里狮驼岭, 再走四
百里远的大路, 才到狮驼国的首都城市狮驼城。而南北有多宽就不知道了, 总之, 这个
范围是相当大的。
狮驼国的国王是谁呢? 就是这个大鹏精! 大鹏正要吃他哩, 他去倒换关文, 大鹏会为他
盖章子放行吗?
如来佛住在雷音寺, 雷音寺在灵山, 灵山属于天竺国的范围, 应该是独立的, 不归天竺
国管辖。但从这可以比较出如来佛的本部势力并没有大鹏精的本部势力大!
大鹏精是国王, 该管辖有多少山多少岭, 多少城多少乡?
2) 他的国家里面全部住的是妖怪。
孙悟空走到这里来的时候, 望见那城中有许多恶气,被吓成什么样子了? 吓了一跌,挣
挫不起。这是孙悟空第一次也是唯一的一次还没交战就吓趴在地上了!
在这座首都城市里, 除了他们都是妖怪之外, 其实治安、次序等各个方面都是良好的,
妖怪们可以在这里当官, 经商, 休闲, 自在的很。西游记中凡是低级别的妖怪, 生存环
境都是非常恶劣的, 结局基本上都是死路一条!
但这里是他们的天堂, 直到西游记终, 这些妖怪们也没被剿灭。
狮子精住在山区的防空洞, 大鹏精住在城市的金銮殿, 那边养的是妖怪军队士兵, 这边
养的是妖怪平民百姓, 可见, 其势力非同小可!
3) 他的这个妖怪国家是合法的。
地上的君王叫作天子, 他们作为天庭的代理人下来治理人间, 所以他们是得到天庭认可
了的。
大鹏精既然是这个国家的君主, 那么, 天庭就是认账的。大鹏于五百年前, 不知何故,
跑来吃了这城国王及文武官僚,满城大小男女也尽被他吃了干净,因此夺了这江山,自
己当了狮驼国的国王。
玉皇大帝没有意见, 道祖老君也没有意见, 佛祖如来没有意见, 大家都认可了。
直到唐僧他们过去之后, 这个国家依然存在! 因为从唐僧的通关文谍上可以看到大鹏为
他们加盖的狮驼国王钦印! 这的印, 也就是国王的玉玺, 他是合法生效的!
大鹏不仅自己在这里当国王, 还把这个地方建设成了一个只有妖怪的国家, 这个势力就
大了。那么, 这个大鹏的地位究竟该怎样定位呢?
作为一个国王, 他是合法的, 玉帝、老君、如来都认账。
作为一个神仙, 恐怕还是有争议的, 因为这一点他不合法, 没有神仙的正规编制, 但是
他又把许许多多没有编制的神仙们组织到了一起, 形成了佛派、道派之外的第三派妖怪
势力, 因此, 他的实际地位应该和道祖、佛祖是在同一个级别上的。
仙即是妖, 佛即是魔, 区别仅在一个编制。所以把大鹏看作是妖祖魔祖是没有问题的。
4)那妖精一封书到灵山,五百阿罗都来迎接;一纸简上天宫,十一大曜个个相钦。
孙悟空上天到了南天门还要例行公事通报, 不过人家对他还算客气。到了灵山, 四大金
刚还要挡住骂他:“这泼猴甚是粗狂!全不为礼!有事且待先奏,奉召方行。这里比南
天门不同,教你进去出来,两边乱走!咄!还不靠开!”
大鹏呢? 他一封信到了灵山,五百罗汉都要跑来接他, 又一封信上了天宫, 十一个太阳
神级别的神仙都要好酒好肉的款待, 做妖怪都做到这个份上了, 还怎么分析他厉害不厉
害!
avatar
c*r
4
我也觉得,新人能交485也很高兴,3类的烙印往前移动也高兴,name check确实也花几
个月的时间,错过大潮交485的也不会一下就被批
但是问题是,有那么多SO剩下吗? 这两个月排期都前进很多,用了不少SO,如果下个
月在到07年7,8月份,这些加起来不少啊,SO如果有3万6的话,也不是很多,能把大潮
的都二类都解决了还有富足给3类?

【在 c**s 的大作中提到】
: 如果各方消息确切。 9月放开排期到2008年某个时候(这部分肯定批不了),同时分
: 流真实名额给EB3。

avatar
c*n
5
我听人说有这么个说法,如果SO要流向EB3,前提是EB2必须C.

【在 c**s 的大作中提到】
: 如果各方消息确切。 9月放开排期到2008年某个时候(这部分肯定批不了),同时分
: 流真实名额给EB3。

avatar
s*m
6
分流给EB, 是不是ROW的EB3会占用很多阿

【在 c**s 的大作中提到】
: 如果各方消息确切。 9月放开排期到2008年某个时候(这部分肯定批不了),同时分
: 流真实名额给EB3。

avatar
s*a
7
如果火箭扇子的说法没问题,如果今年的SO能清空大潮,那就要看CP的DEMAND了吧
根据剩余SO来定排期。而且现在停止处理新495的CASE了吧。SO不是更多?

【在 c**s 的大作中提到】
: 如果各方消息确切。 9月放开排期到2008年某个时候(这部分肯定批不了),同时分
: 流真实名额给EB3。

avatar
c*s
8
为什么不公布DEMAND DATA是重大疑点。
火箭扇说要停止处理新CASE,那样剩余名额会更多。EB3I吃绝大头,EB3C能分一两百
个算不错了。

【在 c****r 的大作中提到】
: 我也觉得,新人能交485也很高兴,3类的烙印往前移动也高兴,name check确实也花几
: 个月的时间,错过大潮交485的也不会一下就被批
: 但是问题是,有那么多SO剩下吗? 这两个月排期都前进很多,用了不少SO,如果下个
: 月在到07年7,8月份,这些加起来不少啊,SO如果有3万6的话,也不是很多,能把大潮
: 的都二类都解决了还有富足给3类?

avatar
c*s
9
肯定是这样。特别剩不多不少那种情况。 2009年老中EB2才分到300剩余名额
,可怜那。
大家能不能都到处打听打听O这最后两个月的计划。

【在 s*****m 的大作中提到】
: 分流给EB, 是不是ROW的EB3会占用很多阿
avatar
s*t
10
I guess the SO should go to EB3 ROW first, which has 44,000 remaining? if
EB3ROW is not C, EB3 I could not get anything?

【在 c**s 的大作中提到】
: 为什么不公布DEMAND DATA是重大疑点。
: 火箭扇说要停止处理新CASE,那样剩余名额会更多。EB3I吃绝大头,EB3C能分一两百
: 个算不错了。

avatar
c*s
11
44,000 remaining?
EB3ROW没必要CURRENT吧,一起前进就行

【在 s****t 的大作中提到】
: I guess the SO should go to EB3 ROW first, which has 44,000 remaining? if
: EB3ROW is not C, EB3 I could not get anything?

avatar
r*n
12
I think it is worth explaining why I believe that spare visa that fall to
EB3 will go to EB3-ROW first. I know that some people do not share this view
. It may be a subject that we agree to disagree on.
The law setting out the fact that a country may not exceed 7% is given under
INA 202 (a)(2):
The law which appears to be used for spillover says the following:
There is an argument that INA 202 (A)(5) quoted above only deals with Fall
Across.
In that case INA 202 (a)(3) contains the same language.
Either way, the argument below is valid.
In EB2, since Mexico, Philippines and ROW are all Current and they have no
further demand, the spare visas are allocated to EB2-IC, since there are no
"qualified immigrants" who may otherwise be issued such visas.
For EB3, in contrast, Countries within EB3-ROW represent "qualified
immigrants", since they have demand and they have not yet reached their own
7% limits.
Spare visas cannot be allocated to EB3-I (who have reached their 7% limit)
until either there is no further demand from EB3-ROW or every Country within
EB3-ROW has reached its own 7% limit.
As much as EB3-I is constrained by the 7% limit, EB3-ROW is constrained by
the overall 28.6% limit of visas available to EB3.
To put this into context, in FY2010, EB3-I received 3,036 visas. Within EB3-
ROW, excluding South Korea, only 5 Countries were able to receive even 1,000
visas.
Worse for EB3-I, no Countries in ROW use their full allocations in EB1/2 &
EB4/5 and the 7% limit is calculated on the overall total.
For simplicity, taking 9,800 as the the 7% limit for EB, then Pakistan, who
used the most EB3 visas at 1,571 only used 3,058 visas in EB overall. They
could use an additional 6,742 spillover visas to reach 9,800.
Excluding South Korea, of ROW Countries, Canada used the most overall EB
visas at 5,893, so even they would be able to use an additional 3,907 visas
to reach the overall 7% limit.
Based on last year, even EB3-P would be able to consume more visas - they
share the same Cut Off Date as ROW and are constrained by it from receiving
more visas.

【在 c**s 的大作中提到】
: 44,000 remaining?
: EB3ROW没必要CURRENT吧,一起前进就行

avatar
r*k
13
it makes sense to me.
Unused visa will flow into EB3-ROW first in EB3 category.

view
under

【在 r********n 的大作中提到】
: I think it is worth explaining why I believe that spare visa that fall to
: EB3 will go to EB3-ROW first. I know that some people do not share this view
: . It may be a subject that we agree to disagree on.
: The law setting out the fact that a country may not exceed 7% is given under
: INA 202 (a)(2):
: The law which appears to be used for spillover says the following:
: There is an argument that INA 202 (A)(5) quoted above only deals with Fall
: Across.
: In that case INA 202 (a)(3) contains the same language.
: Either way, the argument below is valid.

avatar
a*1
14
SO went to EB2I even before EB2C reached our quota.

view
under

【在 r********n 的大作中提到】
: I think it is worth explaining why I believe that spare visa that fall to
: EB3 will go to EB3-ROW first. I know that some people do not share this view
: . It may be a subject that we agree to disagree on.
: The law setting out the fact that a country may not exceed 7% is given under
: INA 202 (a)(2):
: The law which appears to be used for spillover says the following:
: There is an argument that INA 202 (A)(5) quoted above only deals with Fall
: Across.
: In that case INA 202 (a)(3) contains the same language.
: Either way, the argument below is valid.

avatar
d*y
15
如果是引用别人的说法,还请注明出处吧!否则是不是有误导之嫌?
http://www.qesehmk.org/forums/showthread.php?4-EB2-Predictions-
第110页,Spectator的帖子
http://www.qesehmk.org/forums/showthread.php?4-EB2-Predictions
-%28Rather-Calculations%29/page110
Today 09:10 AM #2748
Spectator
Spectator is offline GC-Guru Spectator will become famous soon enough
Join Date Oct 2010 Posts 338
Who Gets Spillover in EB3?
I think it is worth explaining why I believe that spare visa that fall
to EB3 will go to EB3-ROW first. I know that some people do not share this
view. It may be a subject that we agree to disagree on.
The law setting out the fact that a country may not exceed 7% is given
under INA 202 (a)(2):
INA: ACT 202 - NUMERICAL LIMITATION TO ANY SINGLE FOREIGN STATE
(a) Per Country Level. -
(2) Per country levels for family-sponsored and employment-based
immigrants. - Subject to paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) the total number of
immigrant visas made available to natives of any single foreign state or
dependent area under subsections (a) and (b) of section 203 in any fiscal
year may not exceed 7 percent (in the case of a single foreign state) or 2
percent (in the case of a dependent area) of the total number of such visas
made available under such subsections in that fiscal year.
The law which appears to be used for spillover says the following:
(5) RULES FOR EMPLOYMENT-BASED IMMIGRANTS-
(A) EMPLOYMENT-BASED IMMIGRANTS NOT SUBJECT TO PER COUNTRY LIMITATION IF
ADDITIONAL VISAS AVAILABLE- If the total number of visas available under
paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) of section 203(b) for a calendar
quarter exceeds the number of qualified immigrants who may otherwise be
issued such visas, the visas made available under that paragraph shall be
issued without regard to the numerical limitation under paragraph (2) of
this subsection during the remainder of the calendar quarter.
There is an argument that INA 202 (A)(5) quoted above only deals with
Fall Across.
In that case INA 202 (a)(3) contains the same language.
(3) Exception if additional visas available. - If because of the
application of paragraph (2) with respect to one or more foreign states or
dependent areas, the total number of visas available under both subsections
(a) and (b) of section 203 for a calendar quarter exceeds the number of
qualified immigrants who otherwise may be issued such a visa, paragraph (2)
shall not apply to visas made available to such states or areas during the
remainder of such calendar quarter.
Either way, the argument below is valid.
In EB2, since Mexico, Philippines and ROW are all Current and they have
no further demand, the spare visas are allocated to EB2-IC, since there are
no "qualified immigrants" who may otherwise be issued such visas.
For EB3, in contrast, Countries within EB3-ROW represent "qualified
immigrants", since they have demand and they have not yet reached their own
7% limits.
Spare visas cannot be allocated to EB3-I (who have reached their 7%
limit) until either there is no further demand from EB3-ROW or every Country
within EB3-ROW has reached its own 7% limit.
As much as EB3-I is constrained by the 7% limit, EB3-ROW is constrained
by the overall 28.6% limit of visas available to EB3.
To put this into context, in FY2010, EB3-I received 3,036 visas. Within
EB3-ROW, excluding South Korea, only 5 Countries were able to receive even 1
,000 visas.
Worse for EB3-I, no Countries in ROW use their full allocations in EB1/2
& EB4/5 and the 7% limit is calculated on the overall total.
For simplicity, taking 9,800 as the the 7% limit for EB, then Pakistan,
who used the most EB3 visas at 1,571 only used 3,058 visas in EB overall.
They could use an additional 6,742 spillover visas to reach 9,800.
Excluding South Korea, of ROW Countries, Canada used the most overall EB
visas at 5,893, so even they would be able to use an additional 3,907 visas
to reach the overall 7% limit.
Based on last year, even EB3-P would be able to consume more visas -
they share the same Cut Off Date as ROW and are constrained by it from
receiving more visas.
Without an irritant, there can be no pearl.

view
under

【在 r********n 的大作中提到】
: I think it is worth explaining why I believe that spare visa that fall to
: EB3 will go to EB3-ROW first. I know that some people do not share this view
: . It may be a subject that we agree to disagree on.
: The law setting out the fact that a country may not exceed 7% is given under
: INA 202 (a)(2):
: The law which appears to be used for spillover says the following:
: There is an argument that INA 202 (A)(5) quoted above only deals with Fall
: Across.
: In that case INA 202 (a)(3) contains the same language.
: Either way, the argument below is valid.

avatar
n*s
16
I was like, wow, this guy's english is so good.

【在 d**********y 的大作中提到】
: 如果是引用别人的说法,还请注明出处吧!否则是不是有误导之嫌?
: http://www.qesehmk.org/forums/showthread.php?4-EB2-Predictions-
: 第110页,Spectator的帖子
: http://www.qesehmk.org/forums/showthread.php?4-EB2-Predictions
: -%28Rather-Calculations%29/page110
: Today 09:10 AM #2748
: Spectator
: Spectator is offline GC-Guru Spectator will become famous soon enough
: Join Date Oct 2010 Posts 338
: Who Gets Spillover in EB3?

avatar
L*a
17
Actually,his english IS good.
Simply check his replies to many other people on this board.
avatar
s*t
18
Maybe rocketsfan is Spectator.:)

【在 d**********y 的大作中提到】
: 如果是引用别人的说法,还请注明出处吧!否则是不是有误导之嫌?
: http://www.qesehmk.org/forums/showthread.php?4-EB2-Predictions-
: 第110页,Spectator的帖子
: http://www.qesehmk.org/forums/showthread.php?4-EB2-Predictions
: -%28Rather-Calculations%29/page110
: Today 09:10 AM #2748
: Spectator
: Spectator is offline GC-Guru Spectator will become famous soon enough
: Join Date Oct 2010 Posts 338
: Who Gets Spillover in EB3?

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。