NIW-DIY被悲惨的RFE了# EB23 - 劳工卡
b*e
1 楼
rfe内容惨不忍睹！
个人情况如下：
美国soso学校PhD (Computational chemistry&Biophysics)，现一所较top medical
school作postdoc。文章一作5篇（4篇英文，一偏JACS IF8），2作1篇。他引30+。
Invited book chapter 1 篇。审稿1篇（现增为5篇，全英文, IF2-5）。
决定找律师！先咨询了一个朋友极力推荐的律师，比较悲观，刚开始建议重办，但我不
希望浪费1年排期，才答应response。另外咨询了一个律师，比较乐观，认为是最近流
行的generic rfe，我case不是很弱，比较自信。
总而言之，感觉辛苦了半年准备的材料，VO全盘否定，非常痛苦。在这里想听听大家管
我case难易以及律师选择的看法。
如下是rfe大部内容，铺天盖地...
You must establish that the national interest would be served if you were
required to obtain a labor certificate for the proposed employment. ... The
evidence of record does not establish (i) how you have influenced the field
as a whole apart from your current and previous employers; (ii) how you
contributed more than others in the field; and (iii) how you stand apart
from the other in the field as been able to benefit the national interest.
You must persuasively demonstrate that the national interest would be
adversely affected if a labor cert were required. You must demonstrate that
it would be contrary to the national interest to potentially deprive your
employer of your services by making the position available to US workers.
You must establish that you have a past record of specific prior achievement
with some degree of influence on the field as a whole. Your previous
influence on the field as a whole must justify projections of future benefit
to the national interest. You must establish your ability to serve the
national interest to a substantially greater extent than the majority of
others in the field.
You must establish that your skills or background are unique and innovative
and serve the national interest. If you possess any special skills,
knowledge or abilities that could not be articulated on an application for
labor certification, you must submit evidence demonstrate these special
skills, knowledge or abilities.
...Even though you have published articles in the field and had other
researchers to acknowledge the importance of your work in the field, the
totality of the evidence of record does not establish that your skills,
knowledge or abilities could not be articulated on an application for labor
certification.
个人情况如下：
美国soso学校PhD (Computational chemistry&Biophysics)，现一所较top medical
school作postdoc。文章一作5篇（4篇英文，一偏JACS IF8），2作1篇。他引30+。
Invited book chapter 1 篇。审稿1篇（现增为5篇，全英文, IF2-5）。
决定找律师！先咨询了一个朋友极力推荐的律师，比较悲观，刚开始建议重办，但我不
希望浪费1年排期，才答应response。另外咨询了一个律师，比较乐观，认为是最近流
行的generic rfe，我case不是很弱，比较自信。
总而言之，感觉辛苦了半年准备的材料，VO全盘否定，非常痛苦。在这里想听听大家管
我case难易以及律师选择的看法。
如下是rfe大部内容，铺天盖地...
You must establish that the national interest would be served if you were
required to obtain a labor certificate for the proposed employment. ... The
evidence of record does not establish (i) how you have influenced the field
as a whole apart from your current and previous employers; (ii) how you
contributed more than others in the field; and (iii) how you stand apart
from the other in the field as been able to benefit the national interest.
You must persuasively demonstrate that the national interest would be
adversely affected if a labor cert were required. You must demonstrate that
it would be contrary to the national interest to potentially deprive your
employer of your services by making the position available to US workers.
You must establish that you have a past record of specific prior achievement
with some degree of influence on the field as a whole. Your previous
influence on the field as a whole must justify projections of future benefit
to the national interest. You must establish your ability to serve the
national interest to a substantially greater extent than the majority of
others in the field.
You must establish that your skills or background are unique and innovative
and serve the national interest. If you possess any special skills,
knowledge or abilities that could not be articulated on an application for
labor certification, you must submit evidence demonstrate these special
skills, knowledge or abilities.
...Even though you have published articles in the field and had other
researchers to acknowledge the importance of your work in the field, the
totality of the evidence of record does not establish that your skills,
knowledge or abilities could not be articulated on an application for labor
certification.
