c*c
2 楼
刚看完这篇今年雨果奖长中篇奖入围的小说,感受到的冲击和七八前看到Charles
Stross第一个生猛中篇《龙虾》(Lobsters)一样大,大到我觉得有必要专门写一篇介
绍的地步了。按传统分类法,这个小说也可以算是技术派赛伯朋克(cyberpunk)的巅
峰之一了。这篇小说的题目显然是在向Vernor Vinge 1981年写的那篇开创赛伯朋克流
派的同名小说致敬,但除了题目一样以外,故事、人物都完全没有关系。不过“赛伯朋
克”是比较传统的说法。要按现在流行的说法,这个小说属于“后奇点”(post-
singularity)范畴。传统的赛伯朋克至少讲的还是人的故事,就算故事完全发生在虚
拟环境里,那些虚拟环境中的形象毕竟都是现实生活里对应的活生生的人的化身。而这
篇新的True Names,里头的环境就是无所不在的计算介质(computronium),而那些带
有不同动机、性格、行为特点的角色,就是在计算介质中运行的一个个进程、子进程的
意识,而不是现实人类的化身。
故事开始的地方,是一个在太空中飞行的彗星。彗星内部已完全被改造成计算介质,其
中运行着形形色色的称为精灵(sprite
Stross第一个生猛中篇《龙虾》(Lobsters)一样大,大到我觉得有必要专门写一篇介
绍的地步了。按传统分类法,这个小说也可以算是技术派赛伯朋克(cyberpunk)的巅
峰之一了。这篇小说的题目显然是在向Vernor Vinge 1981年写的那篇开创赛伯朋克流
派的同名小说致敬,但除了题目一样以外,故事、人物都完全没有关系。不过“赛伯朋
克”是比较传统的说法。要按现在流行的说法,这个小说属于“后奇点”(post-
singularity)范畴。传统的赛伯朋克至少讲的还是人的故事,就算故事完全发生在虚
拟环境里,那些虚拟环境中的形象毕竟都是现实生活里对应的活生生的人的化身。而这
篇新的True Names,里头的环境就是无所不在的计算介质(computronium),而那些带
有不同动机、性格、行为特点的角色,就是在计算介质中运行的一个个进程、子进程的
意识,而不是现实人类的化身。
故事开始的地方,是一个在太空中飞行的彗星。彗星内部已完全被改造成计算介质,其
中运行着形形色色的称为精灵(sprite
n*e
3 楼
最近建了相似网站搜索的网站: similar-site.com. 欢迎大家尝试并提出宝贵意见
。下面是几个搜索例子
similar-site.com/search.php?URL=www.wenxuecity.com
similar-site.com/search.php?URL=http://www.slickdeals.net/
similar-site.com/search.php?URL=www.monster.com
similar-site.com/search.php?URL=http://coolmath4kids.com/
。下面是几个搜索例子
similar-site.com/search.php?URL=www.wenxuecity.com
similar-site.com/search.php?URL=http://www.slickdeals.net/
similar-site.com/search.php?URL=www.monster.com
similar-site.com/search.php?URL=http://coolmath4kids.com/
b*f
4 楼
I am now seeking qualified and self-motivated Ph.D. students of Computer
Science with adequate background in computing starting from Fall 2009 or
Spring 2010 at the University of Massachusetts Boston. http://www.umb.edu/. Full scholarship is available for qualified Ph.D. students.
For those who are interested, then send me the following items to [email protected]
umb.edu
* A resume
* A copy of your graduate/undergraduate transcript showing grades of courses
in computing
* Photocopy of your GRE transcri
Science with adequate background in computing starting from Fall 2009 or
Spring 2010 at the University of Massachusetts Boston. http://www.umb.edu/. Full scholarship is available for qualified Ph.D. students.
For those who are interested, then send me the following items to [email protected]
umb.edu
* A resume
* A copy of your graduate/undergraduate transcript showing grades of courses
in computing
* Photocopy of your GRE transcri
r*o
5 楼
我看了几天game theory的介绍,有个很简单的概念还是没搞懂,
Nash bargaining 到底是cooperative game还是non-cooperative game?
我觉得既然bargain了那应该是cooperative的吧,但有的书好像也说non-ooperative
game也有Nash bargaining,那是不是cooperative game和non-cooperative game都有
Nash bargaining?
另外,是不是cooperative game和non-coopertative game都可能会有Nash
equilibrium?
我对经济学有点兴趣,问的问题要是太粗浅请勿拍砖。
Nash bargaining 到底是cooperative game还是non-cooperative game?
我觉得既然bargain了那应该是cooperative的吧,但有的书好像也说non-ooperative
game也有Nash bargaining,那是不是cooperative game和non-cooperative game都有
Nash bargaining?
另外,是不是cooperative game和non-coopertative game都可能会有Nash
equilibrium?
我对经济学有点兴趣,问的问题要是太粗浅请勿拍砖。
b*i
6 楼
李胜素是我见过最漂亮的旦角。
这一段 3:30 她出场的时候,艳冠群芳啊~~~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ue82lAvg3Ao
这一段 3:30 她出场的时候,艳冠群芳啊~~~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ue82lAvg3Ao
s*n
7 楼
我靠,精彩。
btw,我不得不又一次崇拜一下calc,能专心把长篇很快读完。我总是开头读一段,
过一段时间就放下了。
【在 c**c 的大作中提到】
: 刚看完这篇今年雨果奖长中篇奖入围的小说,感受到的冲击和七八前看到Charles
: Stross第一个生猛中篇《龙虾》(Lobsters)一样大,大到我觉得有必要专门写一篇介
: 绍的地步了。按传统分类法,这个小说也可以算是技术派赛伯朋克(cyberpunk)的巅
: 峰之一了。这篇小说的题目显然是在向Vernor Vinge 1981年写的那篇开创赛伯朋克流
: 派的同名小说致敬,但除了题目一样以外,故事、人物都完全没有关系。不过“赛伯朋
: 克”是比较传统的说法。要按现在流行的说法,这个小说属于“后奇点”(post-
: singularity)范畴。传统的赛伯朋克至少讲的还是人的故事,就算故事完全发生在虚
: 拟环境里,那些虚拟环境中的形象毕竟都是现实生活里对应的活生生的人的化身。而这
: 篇新的True Names,里头的环境就是无所不在的计算介质(computronium),而那些带
: 有不同动机、性格、行为特点的角色,就是在计算介质中运行的一个个进程、子进程的
btw,我不得不又一次崇拜一下calc,能专心把长篇很快读完。我总是开头读一段,
过一段时间就放下了。
【在 c**c 的大作中提到】
: 刚看完这篇今年雨果奖长中篇奖入围的小说,感受到的冲击和七八前看到Charles
: Stross第一个生猛中篇《龙虾》(Lobsters)一样大,大到我觉得有必要专门写一篇介
: 绍的地步了。按传统分类法,这个小说也可以算是技术派赛伯朋克(cyberpunk)的巅
: 峰之一了。这篇小说的题目显然是在向Vernor Vinge 1981年写的那篇开创赛伯朋克流
: 派的同名小说致敬,但除了题目一样以外,故事、人物都完全没有关系。不过“赛伯朋
: 克”是比较传统的说法。要按现在流行的说法,这个小说属于“后奇点”(post-
: singularity)范畴。传统的赛伯朋克至少讲的还是人的故事,就算故事完全发生在虚
: 拟环境里,那些虚拟环境中的形象毕竟都是现实生活里对应的活生生的人的化身。而这
: 篇新的True Names,里头的环境就是无所不在的计算介质(computronium),而那些带
: 有不同动机、性格、行为特点的角色,就是在计算介质中运行的一个个进程、子进程的
l*a
8 楼
不错啊,能否在分享些网站的细节,我可以加入到我的blog.
see
http://www.mitbbs.com/pc/pccon.php?id=4261&nid=50509&s=all
【在 n********e 的大作中提到】
: 最近建了相似网站搜索的网站: similar-site.com. 欢迎大家尝试并提出宝贵意见
: 。下面是几个搜索例子
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=www.wenxuecity.com
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=http://www.slickdeals.net/
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=www.monster.com
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=http://coolmath4kids.com/
see
http://www.mitbbs.com/pc/pccon.php?id=4261&nid=50509&s=all
【在 n********e 的大作中提到】
: 最近建了相似网站搜索的网站: similar-site.com. 欢迎大家尝试并提出宝贵意见
: 。下面是几个搜索例子
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=www.wenxuecity.com
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=http://www.slickdeals.net/
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=www.monster.com
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=http://coolmath4kids.com/
m*s
9 楼
老师很漂亮,,搞的我没法专心念书
r*o
10 楼
为什么没有人回答呢,是不是这个问题很简单阿?
【在 r****o 的大作中提到】
: 我看了几天game theory的介绍,有个很简单的概念还是没搞懂,
: Nash bargaining 到底是cooperative game还是non-cooperative game?
: 我觉得既然bargain了那应该是cooperative的吧,但有的书好像也说non-ooperative
: game也有Nash bargaining,那是不是cooperative game和non-cooperative game都有
: Nash bargaining?
: 另外,是不是cooperative game和non-coopertative game都可能会有Nash
: equilibrium?
: 我对经济学有点兴趣,问的问题要是太粗浅请勿拍砖。
【在 r****o 的大作中提到】
: 我看了几天game theory的介绍,有个很简单的概念还是没搞懂,
: Nash bargaining 到底是cooperative game还是non-cooperative game?
: 我觉得既然bargain了那应该是cooperative的吧,但有的书好像也说non-ooperative
: game也有Nash bargaining,那是不是cooperative game和non-cooperative game都有
: Nash bargaining?
: 另外,是不是cooperative game和non-coopertative game都可能会有Nash
: equilibrium?
: 我对经济学有点兴趣,问的问题要是太粗浅请勿拍砖。
b*i
11 楼
怎么在回复中插入视频呢?
n*e
13 楼
Thank you. I will post details later on the website when I have some time.
【在 l*****a 的大作中提到】
: 不错啊,能否在分享些网站的细节,我可以加入到我的blog.
: see
: http://www.mitbbs.com/pc/pccon.php?id=4261&nid=50509&s=all
【在 l*****a 的大作中提到】
: 不错啊,能否在分享些网站的细节,我可以加入到我的blog.
: see
: http://www.mitbbs.com/pc/pccon.php?id=4261&nid=50509&s=all
U*e
15 楼
Nash bargaining game is non-cooperative. It assumes that each individual
wants to maximize his own pay-off, i.e. the solution must be self-enforcing.
While in cooperative game, this assumption is replaced by that the solution
is enforced by any outsider, even if some individual does not like it.
By the same reason, Nash equilibrium is a solution concept of non-
cooperative game.
【在 r****o 的大作中提到】
: 我看了几天game theory的介绍,有个很简单的概念还是没搞懂,
: Nash bargaining 到底是cooperative game还是non-cooperative game?
: 我觉得既然bargain了那应该是cooperative的吧,但有的书好像也说non-ooperative
: game也有Nash bargaining,那是不是cooperative game和non-cooperative game都有
: Nash bargaining?
: 另外,是不是cooperative game和non-coopertative game都可能会有Nash
: equilibrium?
: 我对经济学有点兴趣,问的问题要是太粗浅请勿拍砖。
wants to maximize his own pay-off, i.e. the solution must be self-enforcing.
While in cooperative game, this assumption is replaced by that the solution
is enforced by any outsider, even if some individual does not like it.
By the same reason, Nash equilibrium is a solution concept of non-
cooperative game.
【在 r****o 的大作中提到】
: 我看了几天game theory的介绍,有个很简单的概念还是没搞懂,
: Nash bargaining 到底是cooperative game还是non-cooperative game?
: 我觉得既然bargain了那应该是cooperative的吧,但有的书好像也说non-ooperative
: game也有Nash bargaining,那是不是cooperative game和non-cooperative game都有
: Nash bargaining?
: 另外,是不是cooperative game和non-coopertative game都可能会有Nash
: equilibrium?
: 我对经济学有点兴趣,问的问题要是太粗浅请勿拍砖。
j*t
17 楼
这才算是科幻小说,看看起点上的那些真是给小学生看的
m*i
18 楼
We will find the most similar sites for you.
I guess you actually mean "sites that you are most likely looking for"
【在 n********e 的大作中提到】
: 最近建了相似网站搜索的网站: similar-site.com. 欢迎大家尝试并提出宝贵意见
: 。下面是几个搜索例子
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=www.wenxuecity.com
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=http://www.slickdeals.net/
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=www.monster.com
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=http://coolmath4kids.com/
I guess you actually mean "sites that you are most likely looking for"
【在 n********e 的大作中提到】
: 最近建了相似网站搜索的网站: similar-site.com. 欢迎大家尝试并提出宝贵意见
: 。下面是几个搜索例子
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=www.wenxuecity.com
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=http://www.slickdeals.net/
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=www.monster.com
: similar-site.com/search.php?URL=http://coolmath4kids.com/
s*n
22 楼
读了calc的评论开始看这篇,想象力很赞,不过文字不太喜欢。凌乱又有点
缺乏故事性。有点太geeky了。
缺乏故事性。有点太geeky了。
s*n
24 楼
Bullshit!
Nash Bargaining game is of course co-operative game. The two players do not
maximize their own individual utility, but the product of their utility
surplus. However, though formulated as a cooperative game, it is the limit
case of Rubinstein Bargaining game when the time delay converges to zero.
enforcing.
solution
【在 U*****e 的大作中提到】
: Nash bargaining game is non-cooperative. It assumes that each individual
: wants to maximize his own pay-off, i.e. the solution must be self-enforcing.
: While in cooperative game, this assumption is replaced by that the solution
: is enforced by any outsider, even if some individual does not like it.
: By the same reason, Nash equilibrium is a solution concept of non-
: cooperative game.
Nash Bargaining game is of course co-operative game. The two players do not
maximize their own individual utility, but the product of their utility
surplus. However, though formulated as a cooperative game, it is the limit
case of Rubinstein Bargaining game when the time delay converges to zero.
enforcing.
solution
【在 U*****e 的大作中提到】
: Nash bargaining game is non-cooperative. It assumes that each individual
: wants to maximize his own pay-off, i.e. the solution must be self-enforcing.
: While in cooperative game, this assumption is replaced by that the solution
: is enforced by any outsider, even if some individual does not like it.
: By the same reason, Nash equilibrium is a solution concept of non-
: cooperative game.
U*e
27 楼
Your argument is accepted (the rest is returned). I confused it with other
games. This game allows binding contracts so it is cooperative.
not
limit
【在 s*******n 的大作中提到】
: Bullshit!
: Nash Bargaining game is of course co-operative game. The two players do not
: maximize their own individual utility, but the product of their utility
: surplus. However, though formulated as a cooperative game, it is the limit
: case of Rubinstein Bargaining game when the time delay converges to zero.
:
: enforcing.
: solution
games. This game allows binding contracts so it is cooperative.
not
limit
【在 s*******n 的大作中提到】
: Bullshit!
: Nash Bargaining game is of course co-operative game. The two players do not
: maximize their own individual utility, but the product of their utility
: surplus. However, though formulated as a cooperative game, it is the limit
: case of Rubinstein Bargaining game when the time delay converges to zero.
:
: enforcing.
: solution
f*a
28 楼
这个里面的好漂亮啊
丁晓君也很漂亮啊,今年春晚里面她一身蓝裙好像林妹妹
丁晓君也很漂亮啊,今年春晚里面她一身蓝裙好像林妹妹
s*n
30 楼
l*g
32 楼
Read Rubinstein (Econometrica 1982) for non-cooperative formalization of the
Nash bargaining game.
Nash bargaining game.
t*k
33 楼
写的蛮不错,两口气读完。
z*f
34 楼
way too arrogant, you cannot even tell the difference between Nash bargainin
g solution and Nash bargaining game. Who told you Nash bargaining game is a
cooperative game? Bear in mind that cooperative and non-cooperative are used
to describe solutions, not games. Try google or wiki.
Btw, this board is for discussion, mind your attitude.
not
limit
【在 s*******n 的大作中提到】
: Bullshit!
: Nash Bargaining game is of course co-operative game. The two players do not
: maximize their own individual utility, but the product of their utility
: surplus. However, though formulated as a cooperative game, it is the limit
: case of Rubinstein Bargaining game when the time delay converges to zero.
:
: enforcing.
: solution
g solution and Nash bargaining game. Who told you Nash bargaining game is a
cooperative game? Bear in mind that cooperative and non-cooperative are used
to describe solutions, not games. Try google or wiki.
Btw, this board is for discussion, mind your attitude.
not
limit
【在 s*******n 的大作中提到】
: Bullshit!
: Nash Bargaining game is of course co-operative game. The two players do not
: maximize their own individual utility, but the product of their utility
: surplus. However, though formulated as a cooperative game, it is the limit
: case of Rubinstein Bargaining game when the time delay converges to zero.
:
: enforcing.
: solution
q*n
35 楼
我说大哥,下面呐?请接着讲啊。这小说我也懒得自己看了。
【在 c**c 的大作中提到】
: 刚看完这篇今年雨果奖长中篇奖入围的小说,感受到的冲击和七八前看到Charles
: Stross第一个生猛中篇《龙虾》(Lobsters)一样大,大到我觉得有必要专门写一篇介
: 绍的地步了。按传统分类法,这个小说也可以算是技术派赛伯朋克(cyberpunk)的巅
: 峰之一了。这篇小说的题目显然是在向Vernor Vinge 1981年写的那篇开创赛伯朋克流
: 派的同名小说致敬,但除了题目一样以外,故事、人物都完全没有关系。不过“赛伯朋
: 克”是比较传统的说法。要按现在流行的说法,这个小说属于“后奇点”(post-
: singularity)范畴。传统的赛伯朋克至少讲的还是人的故事,就算故事完全发生在虚
: 拟环境里,那些虚拟环境中的形象毕竟都是现实生活里对应的活生生的人的化身。而这
: 篇新的True Names,里头的环境就是无所不在的计算介质(computronium),而那些带
: 有不同动机、性格、行为特点的角色,就是在计算介质中运行的一个个进程、子进程的
【在 c**c 的大作中提到】
: 刚看完这篇今年雨果奖长中篇奖入围的小说,感受到的冲击和七八前看到Charles
: Stross第一个生猛中篇《龙虾》(Lobsters)一样大,大到我觉得有必要专门写一篇介
: 绍的地步了。按传统分类法,这个小说也可以算是技术派赛伯朋克(cyberpunk)的巅
: 峰之一了。这篇小说的题目显然是在向Vernor Vinge 1981年写的那篇开创赛伯朋克流
: 派的同名小说致敬,但除了题目一样以外,故事、人物都完全没有关系。不过“赛伯朋
: 克”是比较传统的说法。要按现在流行的说法,这个小说属于“后奇点”(post-
: singularity)范畴。传统的赛伯朋克至少讲的还是人的故事,就算故事完全发生在虚
: 拟环境里,那些虚拟环境中的形象毕竟都是现实生活里对应的活生生的人的化身。而这
: 篇新的True Names,里头的环境就是无所不在的计算介质(computronium),而那些带
: 有不同动机、性格、行为特点的角色,就是在计算介质中运行的一个个进程、子进程的
U*e
36 楼
good point.
But I guess the concept of Nash bargaining game has been evolving. I checked
Nash 1953 after seeing the impolite post. Nash clearly called his two-
person bargaining game a cooperative one (as he assumed the agents can talk
to each other and the contract is enforceable.)
Then on the other hand, I vaguely remember some current paper on non-
cooperative solutions of Nash Bargaining game even with incomplete
information (If agents can talk and are cooperative, incomplete information
sho
【在 z****f 的大作中提到】
: way too arrogant, you cannot even tell the difference between Nash bargainin
: g solution and Nash bargaining game. Who told you Nash bargaining game is a
: cooperative game? Bear in mind that cooperative and non-cooperative are used
: to describe solutions, not games. Try google or wiki.
: Btw, this board is for discussion, mind your attitude.
:
: not
: limit
But I guess the concept of Nash bargaining game has been evolving. I checked
Nash 1953 after seeing the impolite post. Nash clearly called his two-
person bargaining game a cooperative one (as he assumed the agents can talk
to each other and the contract is enforceable.)
Then on the other hand, I vaguely remember some current paper on non-
cooperative solutions of Nash Bargaining game even with incomplete
information (If agents can talk and are cooperative, incomplete information
sho
【在 z****f 的大作中提到】
: way too arrogant, you cannot even tell the difference between Nash bargainin
: g solution and Nash bargaining game. Who told you Nash bargaining game is a
: cooperative game? Bear in mind that cooperative and non-cooperative are used
: to describe solutions, not games. Try google or wiki.
: Btw, this board is for discussion, mind your attitude.
:
: not
: limit
p*r
37 楼
问一下网上那个96页的电子版是完整的么
就是这里这个
http://www.archive.org/details/TrueNames
【在 c**c 的大作中提到】
: 嗯,这篇小说在网上发布的电子版,估计没有保留实体书的排版,所以视角跳跃的时候
: 没有明显标志,显得很突兀,这一段还在讲这个世界的故事,下一段已经在讲另一个世
: 界的故事了,但读者往往还得再读两三段才能反应过来现在视角已经变了。
就是这里这个
http://www.archive.org/details/TrueNames
【在 c**c 的大作中提到】
: 嗯,这篇小说在网上发布的电子版,估计没有保留实体书的排版,所以视角跳跃的时候
: 没有明显标志,显得很突兀,这一段还在讲这个世界的故事,下一段已经在讲另一个世
: 界的故事了,但读者往往还得再读两三段才能反应过来现在视角已经变了。
s*n
38 楼
Hi, I apologize for the rude words, though it has nothing to do with
arrogance.
checked
talk
information
should
【在 U*****e 的大作中提到】
: good point.
: But I guess the concept of Nash bargaining game has been evolving. I checked
: Nash 1953 after seeing the impolite post. Nash clearly called his two-
: person bargaining game a cooperative one (as he assumed the agents can talk
: to each other and the contract is enforceable.)
: Then on the other hand, I vaguely remember some current paper on non-
: cooperative solutions of Nash Bargaining game even with incomplete
: information (If agents can talk and are cooperative, incomplete information
: sho
arrogance.
checked
talk
information
should
【在 U*****e 的大作中提到】
: good point.
: But I guess the concept of Nash bargaining game has been evolving. I checked
: Nash 1953 after seeing the impolite post. Nash clearly called his two-
: person bargaining game a cooperative one (as he assumed the agents can talk
: to each other and the contract is enforceable.)
: Then on the other hand, I vaguely remember some current paper on non-
: cooperative solutions of Nash Bargaining game even with incomplete
: information (If agents can talk and are cooperative, incomplete information
: sho
c*c
39 楼
对,那个是完整版。Cory Doctorow的小说一般都用Creative Commons License,本来
就可以在网上免费读。
【在 p*******r 的大作中提到】
: 问一下网上那个96页的电子版是完整的么
: 就是这里这个
: http://www.archive.org/details/TrueNames
就可以在网上免费读。
【在 p*******r 的大作中提到】
: 问一下网上那个96页的电子版是完整的么
: 就是这里这个
: http://www.archive.org/details/TrueNames
相关阅读
关于机会成本请推荐价格便宜,资历好 的网上大学。Thanks!MSU RA vs. BU unfunded茅于轼很无耻,张维迎很下流!请教ph.d.offer选择:UCLA, UM Ann Arbor and DukeRe: 来篇雄文:国内大学海龟 烂坑校 Black listrejected by ETone paper needed, thanks如何反驳如下的观点??原来这里可以问申请相关的问题啊...??如果A教授的能力比 B教授强,请教多期问题的求解工科背景,想读ECON的ph.d该怎么入手阿<offer 选择求教> accounting phd@LBS vs finance phd@UFLSAS date question: Help请教做corporate finance实证分析的数据,有没有比较有名而又免费的数据库请教大家一般各大杂志审稿期有多久?3个月?李玲:中国医改 “岸”在何方?抄袭requesting a paper: Haigh (1975)