how to understand it# EnglishChat - 鸟语花香
G*G
1 楼
Many economists think that adding hours for employees is an important
precursor
to actual hiring. So the increase in involuntary part-time workers may
be viewed as disappointing.
why may it be viewd as 'disappointing' although hours for employees are
increased?
They should be happy, shouldn't they?
precursor
to actual hiring. So the increase in involuntary part-time workers may
be viewed as disappointing.
why may it be viewd as 'disappointing' although hours for employees are
increased?
They should be happy, shouldn't they?