RFE 求建议！# Immigration - 落地生根
w*i
1 楼
拿了个RFE，把内容发出来，同时也把自己response的strategy和detailed points都list 出来了；想征求一下大家的建议。
背景：
1) ME, Ph.D
2) 14 papers, 7 journals (6 1st authored) + 7 conference
3) 1 best conference paper in some axian country (not China)
4) 41 total citation + 5 email from industries and universities asking for details
5) 38 reviews
6) 4 letters from expert, + 2 letters from editors
7) conference chair and topic organizer for two years
claim: authorship, review, contribution
RFE: Passed authorship, review, NOT contribution
问题：
1）好像很多人都是reorganize一下petition letter 的 contribution part.我也打算这么做，是不是意味着原封不动的copy paste过来，还是说最好把内容更言简意赅一点？我记得有人说过，尽量用bullet,每段里面最多几个句子，不要太长？大家说呢？
2）top percentage不好证明，我就一个小奖 + published journal rank percentage，感觉没有什么其他可以补充的。 大家还有什么好的意见吗？
3）好像很多人，response to RFE动不动就是１７页，搞得跟petition letter一样，感觉我的response of RFE最多不超过１０页，不会有问题吧？
Center: TSC
IO: XM1172
RFE:
A review of the evidence submitted does not show that your contributions are
considered to be of major significance in the field of endeavor. The record
lacks evidence to support your claim. The submitted letters of
recommendation do not specifically identify how your contributions have
influenced the field as a whole; rather the letters describe your experience
, accomplishments, and talent as a scientist. None of the evidence presented
indicates a contribution of major significance in the field of endeavor or
how they significantly impacted the field. The authors mentioned about your
scientific study about XXX. Most of them acknowledged that such technology
can XXX. However, there is no evidence to show the degree of influence of
your scientific study to the field or how your contributions are original
and how significantly impacted the field.
1.Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary’s
contribution to the field.
2.Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider
thebeneficiary’s work important.
3.Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary’s contributions of major significance.
4.Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
5.Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
(1)Contracts with companies using the beneficiary’s products;
(2)Licensed technology being used by others;
(3)Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the
field.
My response:
Strategy:
1. 针对推荐信，重新要了4封，3封企业的，1封 academic scientist,重点 or
specifically强调我的contribution,而不再像以前一样只是acknowledge my
contribution as a whole, not specifically.
2. 重新organize一下petition letter里面的contribution part
Details:
A) Acknowledgement of my work being applied in both industries and acaemic
field.
1) letter one
2) letter two
3) letter three
B) I am the pioneer in the field of xxx research and brough original impact
to xxx field.
第一段：文献搜索证明我领域就我一人在做，我是pioneer
第二段：letter four,证明我的original impact to xxx field
B) My work has been honored one nationally and internationally recognized
award for excellence in my field of eadevor
xxx 一段 191字
C）My work has been published in leading energy research journals and
conferences.
xxx journal ranks 一段 300字
xxx conference ranks 一段300字
D) My research papers have received significantly more citations than
journal articles in engineering field and the citations were from 9
different countries
一段100字 + citation map
F) I have sustained national or international acclaim
第一段：短短一个月新增3个review,其中一个rank 1 in the field
第二段：对rank 1 的journal, reviewed multiple times, which suggests that I
have sustained national or international acclaim
第三段：one email asking for technical questions
G) I am one of small percentage who has rise to the very top of the field of
endeavor
第一段：award belongs to 0.4%
第二段：journal ranks top percentage
第三段：xxx ?????
背景：
1) ME, Ph.D
2) 14 papers, 7 journals (6 1st authored) + 7 conference
3) 1 best conference paper in some axian country (not China)
4) 41 total citation + 5 email from industries and universities asking for details
5) 38 reviews
6) 4 letters from expert, + 2 letters from editors
7) conference chair and topic organizer for two years
claim: authorship, review, contribution
RFE: Passed authorship, review, NOT contribution
问题：
1）好像很多人都是reorganize一下petition letter 的 contribution part.我也打算这么做，是不是意味着原封不动的copy paste过来，还是说最好把内容更言简意赅一点？我记得有人说过，尽量用bullet,每段里面最多几个句子，不要太长？大家说呢？
2）top percentage不好证明，我就一个小奖 + published journal rank percentage，感觉没有什么其他可以补充的。 大家还有什么好的意见吗？
3）好像很多人，response to RFE动不动就是１７页，搞得跟petition letter一样，感觉我的response of RFE最多不超过１０页，不会有问题吧？
Center: TSC
IO: XM1172
RFE:
A review of the evidence submitted does not show that your contributions are
considered to be of major significance in the field of endeavor. The record
lacks evidence to support your claim. The submitted letters of
recommendation do not specifically identify how your contributions have
influenced the field as a whole; rather the letters describe your experience
, accomplishments, and talent as a scientist. None of the evidence presented
indicates a contribution of major significance in the field of endeavor or
how they significantly impacted the field. The authors mentioned about your
scientific study about XXX. Most of them acknowledged that such technology
can XXX. However, there is no evidence to show the degree of influence of
your scientific study to the field or how your contributions are original
and how significantly impacted the field.
1.Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary’s
contribution to the field.
2.Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider
thebeneficiary’s work important.
3.Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary’s contributions of major significance.
4.Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
5.Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
(1)Contracts with companies using the beneficiary’s products;
(2)Licensed technology being used by others;
(3)Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the
field.
My response:
Strategy:
1. 针对推荐信，重新要了4封，3封企业的，1封 academic scientist,重点 or
specifically强调我的contribution,而不再像以前一样只是acknowledge my
contribution as a whole, not specifically.
2. 重新organize一下petition letter里面的contribution part
Details:
A) Acknowledgement of my work being applied in both industries and acaemic
field.
1) letter one
2) letter two
3) letter three
B) I am the pioneer in the field of xxx research and brough original impact
to xxx field.
第一段：文献搜索证明我领域就我一人在做，我是pioneer
第二段：letter four,证明我的original impact to xxx field
B) My work has been honored one nationally and internationally recognized
award for excellence in my field of eadevor
xxx 一段 191字
C）My work has been published in leading energy research journals and
conferences.
xxx journal ranks 一段 300字
xxx conference ranks 一段300字
D) My research papers have received significantly more citations than
journal articles in engineering field and the citations were from 9
different countries
一段100字 + citation map
F) I have sustained national or international acclaim
第一段：短短一个月新增3个review,其中一个rank 1 in the field
第二段：对rank 1 的journal, reviewed multiple times, which suggests that I
have sustained national or international acclaim
第三段：one email asking for technical questions
G) I am one of small percentage who has rise to the very top of the field of
endeavor
第一段：award belongs to 0.4%
第二段：journal ranks top percentage
第三段：xxx ?????