回报祝福: 怎样突出editorial /PC member 经验# Immigration - 落地生根
s*y
1 楼
回报祝福: 怎样突出editorial /PC member 经验
背景：pp TSC 一天过。diy.
Paper:9,citation> 2000.
我的review 不多，13 个。但有editorial /PC member 经验.个人感觉，如果阐述好了
，可以抵得上几十个review.鉴于很多人都在
问这方面的问题，我把我的经验谈一谈。如果觉得有用，请移玉到此给我485祝福一二
。谢谢。http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/32777319.html
起始就紧扣：I am scientifically privileged
IV. I HAVE FREQUENTLY JUDGED OTHER SCIENTISTS’ WORK
1. I am scientifically privileged to judge other scientists’ work in my
field.
I am an Editorial Board member of the International Journal of xxxxxxx (
xxxxxxx), and a Program Committee Member (PC Member) for the xxxxxxxxxx (xxx
) 2011 and 2012. A part of my scientific duty is to judge other scientists’
work for the journal and the conference.
xxxx is a peer reviewed and well-established international journal for
xxxx discoveries. As an Editorial Board member, I work with editors to
dictate the tone and direction of the editorial policy and to review the
manuscripts for making decisions on acceptance [Exhibit E.2, A.4]. Hosted
by xxx, the No.1 xxxxx conference in XXX, the xxxxx focuses on xxxx, and
forges the collaborations between xxxx and xxx. The top priority of PC
Members including myself is to inspire and identify novel xxx solutions
through large submissions for the workshop [Exhibit E.4, A4].
I also have received Editorial Board service requests from other
journals. The most recent one is made from the Journal of xxxxx, an
international, peer-reviewed journal edited by Dr. xxx, the Director of the
xxxxx at Harvard Medical School. The invitation presented below is another
good evidence to
show my status as an internationally recognized expert in xxxx.
“Based on your eminent contributions in the field xxxx, especially your
novel work in both xxxx and xxxxx, I would like to invite you to join the
editorial board of the Journal of xxxx. xxxxx publishes papers on all
aspects of cxxxxxy and xxxxxx. It is an international, peer-reviewed journal
promoting original research works in xxxxx. The journal has high visibility
and is indexed in PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, Chemical
Abstracts Service, and many other public and private databases.
As an editorial board member, you will be expected, along with other
board members who all are internationally recognized researchers in the
field, to review for the journal as needed, to act as a journal ambassador,
and to be consulted on editorial matters. In particular, if editors are
unavailable to make an editorial decision on a paper, you may be asked to
take the final responsibility. The success of xxxx depends on the strong
support from leading expert like you. I look forward to hearing your
decision!” [Exhibit E.3]
2. I have been frequently invited to judge the quality of other scientists
’ for top ranked international journals and conferences.
In addition, I have reviewed research papers upon invitations by xxxx,
xxxx, and 2012 xxxxx (xxxx2012) [Exhibit E.5-7]
Below is the description of the journals and conferences that I have
reviewed for:
“xxxxx” is published in the United Kingdom and ranks No. 3 among 290
journals in Genetics [Exhibit E.8]. This journal, one of the first full open
access journals, carries a high impact factor of xxxxx, and publishes the
results of leading edge research into physical, chemical, biochemical and
biological aspects of nucleic acids and proteins involved in nucleic acid
metabolism and/or interactions. Nucleic Acids Research has been chosen by
the Special Libraries Association as one of the top 100 most influential
journals in medicine and biology [Exhibit E.8].
“BMC Medical Genomics” is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that
covers all aspects of functional genomics, genome structure, genome-scale
population genetics, epigenomics, proteomics, systems analysis, and
pharmacogenomics in relation to human health and disease [Exhibit E.8].
“xxxxxx ( Ixxxx)” is the most comprehensive conference focused on the
various aspects of advances in xxx fields such as xxx, xxx, xxxs, xxx. Since
its launch in 2005, this conference has become the premier forum featuring
original and peer-reviewed research papers in the above fields [Exhibit E.8].
To date, I have reviewed 13 manuscripts (17 times) for 5 top-ranked
international journals and conferences with worldwide circulation [Exhibit E
.1, E.8-9]. The information about these journals and conferences is
summarized in [Exhibit E.8]. The evidence of reviewing including the
invitation letters and acknowledgement letters for these 13 manuscripts I
have reviewed are also enclosed [Exhibit E.9].
3. The reason I was invited to serve on the Editorial Boards, Program
Committee, and to review other scientists’ work is due to my international
reputation and my expertise of excellence in the field.
The journals and conferences I have served on hold high standards in
selecting Editorial board members, PC members and expert reviewers, which
are evidenced by the following testimonials from the editors:
Dr.xxxx, Editor-in-Chief of xxxx, provides an independent evaluation of
my contribution to the xxxx: “As the Editor-in-Chief ofxxxx, I would like
to point out xxxx is a well-established international journal for
xxxxdiscoveries, and holds a high standard in selecting editorial board
members. The selection of Dr. xxxxx is in recognition of xxx international
reputation and proven track record. As one of the top experts in the field
of XXXX, xxxx is among of the most valuable reviewers for the journal, in
terms of the quantity and quality of her reviewing efforts. ” [Exhibit A.4].
Prof. xxxx, the Executive Editor of journal xxx, testified the reasons
that xxxxnvited me as an ad-hoc reviewer: “xxxx has been in publication for
over 40 years and is one of the top rated scientific journals in the
subject area of xxx. The high standards of the journal are due in large part
to the professionalism and quality of our reviewers. Reviewers are topic
experts who assist the editor by evaluating the suitability of manuscripts
in terms of originality, significance, completeness, and accuracy. We only
invite scientists with outstanding credentials as manuscript reviewers. Dr.
xxx, who obtained xxx XX. in 1998 and Ph.D. xxxx in 2010, has had over 10
publications in leading journals and I have high confidence in her judgment.
” [Exhibit E.5].
Dr. xxxx, a PC member of xxxxx) spoke highly on my review performance,
and explained why I was selected by xxxxx: “We receive large amount of
submissions yearly. The high standard of quality the xxxxx has achieved is
largely attributed to the high quality of reviewers and the peer-review
processes. The reviewers are top experts who assist Program Committee
Members to evaluate the suitability of the manuscripts for the conference
in terms of originality, significance, completeness, and accuracy. Only
scientists who have established an international reputation of excellence in
their fields are considered to judge the research of other scientists. Dr.
XXXX is one of our valuable reviewers who undoubtedly meet the requirement
.” [Exhibit E.7].
背景：pp TSC 一天过。diy.
Paper:9,citation> 2000.
我的review 不多，13 个。但有editorial /PC member 经验.个人感觉，如果阐述好了
，可以抵得上几十个review.鉴于很多人都在
问这方面的问题，我把我的经验谈一谈。如果觉得有用，请移玉到此给我485祝福一二
。谢谢。http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/32777319.html
起始就紧扣：I am scientifically privileged
IV. I HAVE FREQUENTLY JUDGED OTHER SCIENTISTS’ WORK
1. I am scientifically privileged to judge other scientists’ work in my
field.
I am an Editorial Board member of the International Journal of xxxxxxx (
xxxxxxx), and a Program Committee Member (PC Member) for the xxxxxxxxxx (xxx
) 2011 and 2012. A part of my scientific duty is to judge other scientists’
work for the journal and the conference.
xxxx is a peer reviewed and well-established international journal for
xxxx discoveries. As an Editorial Board member, I work with editors to
dictate the tone and direction of the editorial policy and to review the
manuscripts for making decisions on acceptance [Exhibit E.2, A.4]. Hosted
by xxx, the No.1 xxxxx conference in XXX, the xxxxx focuses on xxxx, and
forges the collaborations between xxxx and xxx. The top priority of PC
Members including myself is to inspire and identify novel xxx solutions
through large submissions for the workshop [Exhibit E.4, A4].
I also have received Editorial Board service requests from other
journals. The most recent one is made from the Journal of xxxxx, an
international, peer-reviewed journal edited by Dr. xxx, the Director of the
xxxxx at Harvard Medical School. The invitation presented below is another
good evidence to
show my status as an internationally recognized expert in xxxx.
“Based on your eminent contributions in the field xxxx, especially your
novel work in both xxxx and xxxxx, I would like to invite you to join the
editorial board of the Journal of xxxx. xxxxx publishes papers on all
aspects of cxxxxxy and xxxxxx. It is an international, peer-reviewed journal
promoting original research works in xxxxx. The journal has high visibility
and is indexed in PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, Chemical
Abstracts Service, and many other public and private databases.
As an editorial board member, you will be expected, along with other
board members who all are internationally recognized researchers in the
field, to review for the journal as needed, to act as a journal ambassador,
and to be consulted on editorial matters. In particular, if editors are
unavailable to make an editorial decision on a paper, you may be asked to
take the final responsibility. The success of xxxx depends on the strong
support from leading expert like you. I look forward to hearing your
decision!” [Exhibit E.3]
2. I have been frequently invited to judge the quality of other scientists
’ for top ranked international journals and conferences.
In addition, I have reviewed research papers upon invitations by xxxx,
xxxx, and 2012 xxxxx (xxxx2012) [Exhibit E.5-7]
Below is the description of the journals and conferences that I have
reviewed for:
“xxxxx” is published in the United Kingdom and ranks No. 3 among 290
journals in Genetics [Exhibit E.8]. This journal, one of the first full open
access journals, carries a high impact factor of xxxxx, and publishes the
results of leading edge research into physical, chemical, biochemical and
biological aspects of nucleic acids and proteins involved in nucleic acid
metabolism and/or interactions. Nucleic Acids Research has been chosen by
the Special Libraries Association as one of the top 100 most influential
journals in medicine and biology [Exhibit E.8].
“BMC Medical Genomics” is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that
covers all aspects of functional genomics, genome structure, genome-scale
population genetics, epigenomics, proteomics, systems analysis, and
pharmacogenomics in relation to human health and disease [Exhibit E.8].
“xxxxxx ( Ixxxx)” is the most comprehensive conference focused on the
various aspects of advances in xxx fields such as xxx, xxx, xxxs, xxx. Since
its launch in 2005, this conference has become the premier forum featuring
original and peer-reviewed research papers in the above fields [Exhibit E.8].
To date, I have reviewed 13 manuscripts (17 times) for 5 top-ranked
international journals and conferences with worldwide circulation [Exhibit E
.1, E.8-9]. The information about these journals and conferences is
summarized in [Exhibit E.8]. The evidence of reviewing including the
invitation letters and acknowledgement letters for these 13 manuscripts I
have reviewed are also enclosed [Exhibit E.9].
3. The reason I was invited to serve on the Editorial Boards, Program
Committee, and to review other scientists’ work is due to my international
reputation and my expertise of excellence in the field.
The journals and conferences I have served on hold high standards in
selecting Editorial board members, PC members and expert reviewers, which
are evidenced by the following testimonials from the editors:
Dr.xxxx, Editor-in-Chief of xxxx, provides an independent evaluation of
my contribution to the xxxx: “As the Editor-in-Chief ofxxxx, I would like
to point out xxxx is a well-established international journal for
xxxxdiscoveries, and holds a high standard in selecting editorial board
members. The selection of Dr. xxxxx is in recognition of xxx international
reputation and proven track record. As one of the top experts in the field
of XXXX, xxxx is among of the most valuable reviewers for the journal, in
terms of the quantity and quality of her reviewing efforts. ” [Exhibit A.4].
Prof. xxxx, the Executive Editor of journal xxx, testified the reasons
that xxxxnvited me as an ad-hoc reviewer: “xxxx has been in publication for
over 40 years and is one of the top rated scientific journals in the
subject area of xxx. The high standards of the journal are due in large part
to the professionalism and quality of our reviewers. Reviewers are topic
experts who assist the editor by evaluating the suitability of manuscripts
in terms of originality, significance, completeness, and accuracy. We only
invite scientists with outstanding credentials as manuscript reviewers. Dr.
xxx, who obtained xxx XX. in 1998 and Ph.D. xxxx in 2010, has had over 10
publications in leading journals and I have high confidence in her judgment.
” [Exhibit E.5].
Dr. xxxx, a PC member of xxxxx) spoke highly on my review performance,
and explained why I was selected by xxxxx: “We receive large amount of
submissions yearly. The high standard of quality the xxxxx has achieved is
largely attributed to the high quality of reviewers and the peer-review
processes. The reviewers are top experts who assist Program Committee
Members to evaluate the suitability of the manuscripts for the conference
in terms of originality, significance, completeness, and accuracy. Only
scientists who have established an international reputation of excellence in
their fields are considered to judge the research of other scientists. Dr.
XXXX is one of our valuable reviewers who undoubtedly meet the requirement
.” [Exhibit E.7].
