Redian新闻
>
问二个eb1b claim authroship的问题
avatar
c*e
2
谢谢!
问大家一个问题, 关于绿卡的claim authorship
这个authorship只能是paper和conference abstract么?
如果给了一个talk,但是这个talk没有proceeding也没有正式的abstract,这个东西可
以算authorship么?(是个在某个公司的invited talk, 网上是有记录的,但是不是学
术presentation,所以没有conference abstract这种东西)
另一个问题是:eb1b一定要claim authorship么?可以只claim review和contribution
么?
自己的authorship太弱,真是不想claim.可是网上有人说, authorship和contribution
相辅相成,即使是eb1b也需要claim authorship,不然IO都懒得看contribution直接
reject了
avatar
a*t
3
几百个?发包子吧

【在 p***A 的大作中提到】
: WOW.. what's in the box?
avatar
d*n
4
如果你能提供证据是你的talk,个人认为应该算
第二个问题回答起来很难,不能说你claim review and contribution行或不行,你的
背景是什么情况,authorship弱,有多弱,说一下,可以帮你分析分析。

【在 c********e 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢!
: 问大家一个问题, 关于绿卡的claim authorship
: 这个authorship只能是paper和conference abstract么?
: 如果给了一个talk,但是这个talk没有proceeding也没有正式的abstract,这个东西可
: 以算authorship么?(是个在某个公司的invited talk, 网上是有记录的,但是不是学
: 术presentation,所以没有conference abstract这种东西)
: 另一个问题是:eb1b一定要claim authorship么?可以只claim review和contribution
: 么?
: 自己的authorship太弱,真是不想claim.可是网上有人说, authorship和contribution
: 相辅相成,即使是eb1b也需要claim authorship,不然IO都懒得看contribution直接

avatar
z*8
5
talk可以算contribution,算authorship有点勉强
avatar
b*e
6

西可
这个不算。这个authorship可不是随便发表一篇technical report就是的,必须是
international circulated books or articles.
contribution
contribution
当然不一定。就看你能够做到哪一些了。 比如说有同学没文章,但是有很多牛逼专利
,并且创造了很大的价值,那当然也能够claim这一项。

【在 c********e 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢!
: 问大家一个问题, 关于绿卡的claim authorship
: 这个authorship只能是paper和conference abstract么?
: 如果给了一个talk,但是这个talk没有proceeding也没有正式的abstract,这个东西可
: 以算authorship么?(是个在某个公司的invited talk, 网上是有记录的,但是不是学
: 术presentation,所以没有conference abstract这种东西)
: 另一个问题是:eb1b一定要claim authorship么?可以只claim review和contribution
: 么?
: 自己的authorship太弱,真是不想claim.可是网上有人说, authorship和contribution
: 相辅相成,即使是eb1b也需要claim authorship,不然IO都懒得看contribution直接

avatar
d*n
7
http://www.yale.edu/perception/Brian/misc/musings/bjs-authorshi
"Authorship on a paper can signal that a person carefully designed a project
; that they wrote part or all of the paper; that they had no role in
designing or writing but that they nevertheless spent a significant amount
of time and effort working on it; that they simply had some particularly
good ideas relating to the project; that they belong to the lab in which the
project was conducted, but did not participate directly; that they helped
out with the data analysis; that they owned the equipment on which the
experiments were run; that they simply hold a senior position in the lab in
which the project was carried out but aren't even familiar with the specific
project; etc."

【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: talk可以算contribution,算authorship有点勉强
avatar
y*z
8
I also want to the issue of authorship. Every one, please express your
opinion.
For the conference abstract, can we claim the authorship to IO?
avatar
y*z
9
顶 一下
avatar
d*n
10
发信人: dharmacon (静心), 信区: Immigration
标 题: Re: 问二个eb1b claim authroship的问题
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Aug 19 09:03:20 2013, 美东)
http://www.yale.edu/perception/Brian/misc/musings/bjs-authorshi
"Authorship on a paper can signal that a person carefully designed a project
; that they wrote part or all of the paper; that they had no role in
designing or writing but that they nevertheless spent a significant amount
of time and effort working on it; that they simply had some particularly
good ideas relating to the project; that they belong to the lab in which the
project was conducted, but did not participate directly; that they helped
out with the data analysis; that they owned the equipment on which the
experiments were run; that they simply hold a senior position in the lab in
which the project was carried out but aren't even familiar with the specific
project; etc."

【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: talk可以算contribution,算authorship有点勉强
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。