收到REF的邮件，内容很少，这是模板回复么？# Immigration - 落地生根
y*p
1 楼
买东西之前请将要买的东西 到我邮箱n******[email protected] 或 站内信
。。。。
其实 大多数人自己是知道的？
。。。。
其实 大多数人自己是知道的？
h*n
2 楼
承认了authorship和review，质疑contribution。总感觉像是简单的模板回复，上来问
问有过REF的版友，都这样么？考古了一下版上，有人说IO在REF里提到PL中的内容，逐
条质疑，可我这就这么一条，貌似简单，可就相当于全盘否定要我重写contribution。
In support of this criterion, the petitioner has provided letters from
various experts in her field, and a citation history to her published work.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. While the authors of the petitioner's
letter of reference describe her as a very talented research scientist,
they do not describe her contribution as one of major significance. Her
citation history, while indicative of some interest in her work, does not
corroborate the assertion that her contribution has been of major
significance. To assist in determining whether the beneficiary's
contributions are original and of major significance in the field, the
petitioner may submit:
然后就举了一些例子，推荐信，媒体报导，专利应用或者公司的合同等等的。
我的case很弱，能弄得就只有重新找人写推荐信了，别的也不好找，引用实在不多。作
为回应，推荐信必然要狂吹significance and originality，就算这样，能行么？连我
少的可怜的citation history都提到了，怎么破解？求大神们给点建议吧。
问有过REF的版友，都这样么？考古了一下版上，有人说IO在REF里提到PL中的内容，逐
条质疑，可我这就这么一条，貌似简单，可就相当于全盘否定要我重写contribution。
In support of this criterion, the petitioner has provided letters from
various experts in her field, and a citation history to her published work.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. While the authors of the petitioner's
letter of reference describe her as a very talented research scientist,
they do not describe her contribution as one of major significance. Her
citation history, while indicative of some interest in her work, does not
corroborate the assertion that her contribution has been of major
significance. To assist in determining whether the beneficiary's
contributions are original and of major significance in the field, the
petitioner may submit:
然后就举了一些例子，推荐信，媒体报导，专利应用或者公司的合同等等的。
我的case很弱，能弄得就只有重新找人写推荐信了，别的也不好找，引用实在不多。作
为回应，推荐信必然要狂吹significance and originality，就算这样，能行么？连我
少的可怜的citation history都提到了，怎么破解？求大神们给点建议吧。
A*0
3 楼
不知道不知道，解释一下？
【在 y*******p 的大作中提到】
: 买东西之前请将要买的东西 到我邮箱n******[email protected] 或 站内信
: 。。。。
: 其实 大多数人自己是知道的？
【在 y*******p 的大作中提到】
: 买东西之前请将要买的东西 到我邮箱n******[email protected] 或 站内信
: 。。。。
: 其实 大多数人自己是知道的？
h*4
4 楼
Big bless!
g*i
5 楼
可能就是代购amz然后给4%返点吧。
【在 A**********0 的大作中提到】
: 不知道不知道，解释一下？
【在 A**********0 的大作中提到】
: 不知道不知道，解释一下？
r*n
6 楼
Citation少不是问题，关键在于如何深挖，掘地三尺，找出每一个引用你的文章的人或
机构到底拿你的文章做了哪些对人类有用的事情，这才是contribution，而不是简单的
介绍有多少人引用。
机构到底拿你的文章做了哪些对人类有用的事情，这才是contribution，而不是简单的
介绍有多少人引用。
z*s
7 楼
比 citi forward 5% 好吗？
s*e
8 楼
pat
bless!
show
's
【在 h***n 的大作中提到】
: 承认了authorship和review，质疑contribution。总感觉像是简单的模板回复，上来问
: 问有过REF的版友，都这样么？考古了一下版上，有人说IO在REF里提到PL中的内容，逐
: 条质疑，可我这就这么一条，貌似简单，可就相当于全盘否定要我重写contribution。
: In support of this criterion, the petitioner has provided letters from
: various experts in her field, and a citation history to her published work.
: This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
: that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
: significance in the field of endeavor. While the authors of the petitioner's
: letter of reference describe her as a very talented research scientist,
: they do not describe her contribution as one of major significance. Her
bless!
show
's
【在 h***n 的大作中提到】
: 承认了authorship和review，质疑contribution。总感觉像是简单的模板回复，上来问
: 问有过REF的版友，都这样么？考古了一下版上，有人说IO在REF里提到PL中的内容，逐
: 条质疑，可我这就这么一条，貌似简单，可就相当于全盘否定要我重写contribution。
: In support of this criterion, the petitioner has provided letters from
: various experts in her field, and a citation history to her published work.
: This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
: that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
: significance in the field of endeavor. While the authors of the petitioner's
: letter of reference describe her as a very talented research scientist,
: they do not describe her contribution as one of major significance. Her
y*p
9 楼
CITI 是和解!
t*x
10 楼
letter of reference describe her as a very talented research scientist,
they do not describe her contribution as one of major significance.
这句话估计是推荐信写的太多描述自己的工作，没有写别人怎么应用你的研究
they do not describe her contribution as one of major significance.
这句话估计是推荐信写的太多描述自己的工作，没有写别人怎么应用你的研究
y*p
11 楼
是类似REBATE 网站哈。。
在上面发算广告 所以就站内信告知咯
在上面发算广告 所以就站内信告知咯
h*n
12 楼
请问是用你的账号还是通过cash back的连结？谢谢
S*g
13 楼
应该是amazon的referral吧
别折腾了，你拿不到那个钱的
【在 y*******p 的大作中提到】
: 买东西之前请将要买的东西 到我邮箱n******[email protected] 或 站内信
: 。。。。
: 其实 大多数人自己是知道的？
别折腾了，你拿不到那个钱的
【在 y*******p 的大作中提到】
: 买东西之前请将要买的东西 到我邮箱n******[email protected] 或 站内信
: 。。。。
: 其实 大多数人自己是知道的？
g*y
14 楼
不是 amazon affiliate吗？
d*h
15 楼
Take care!
Hello,
While reviewing your account, we found that the majority of the orders
placed have been for personal use, resale or commercial use. These
purchases are not Qualifying Transactions and we don’t pay advertising fees
for them as stated in the Associates Program Operating Agreement. You can
review the complete text of the Operating Agreement via this link:
http://affiliate-program.amazon.com/gp/associates/agreement
Because of this violation of the Operating Agreement terms, your Associates
account has been closed and you will not receive further payment. Please
remove all Amazon content, including Special Links, from your site(s)
immediately. Any other accounts you may have or may open in the future
which are found in violation of the Operating Agreement terms may be closed
and advertising fees withheld without notification.
Thank you for your understanding and best of luck in the future.
Best regards,
Chad P.
http://www.amazon.com
Hello,
While reviewing your account, we found that the majority of the orders
placed have been for personal use, resale or commercial use. These
purchases are not Qualifying Transactions and we don’t pay advertising fees
for them as stated in the Associates Program Operating Agreement. You can
review the complete text of the Operating Agreement via this link:
http://affiliate-program.amazon.com/gp/associates/agreement
Because of this violation of the Operating Agreement terms, your Associates
account has been closed and you will not receive further payment. Please
remove all Amazon content, including Special Links, from your site(s)
immediately. Any other accounts you may have or may open in the future
which are found in violation of the Operating Agreement terms may be closed
and advertising fees withheld without notification.
Thank you for your understanding and best of luck in the future.
Best regards,
Chad P.
http://www.amazon.com
g*a
16 楼
that may work if you open a website showing some listing from amazon
相关阅读
EB1B 140公司交了还没批时候， 可以自己交485吗？急问I140和I485同时PP寄的地址(from New York state)三个审稿机会（药物流行病学、药物安全性方向）can I translate my own documents? and obtain certification from myself as well?I485被转到TSC是什么意思？公司办绿卡，大家是直接联系hr?3012什么时候知道最终结果啊？？？律师说review的国家数目没有用i-693 civil surgeon if I recently just had a physical examwhat would be a EVL for a student申绿卡为什么会查交税记录？USCIS在干吗呢？同时file 140， 485 的利和弊请教一个EB1b的case3月份的排期什么能出来,谢谢NSC485还没批的都来报个道哈最近几个月收到485/765打指纹通知的有木有？请进！发光包子求祝福－update发完求祝福就通过了immediate eecs networking方向reviewI131 3. Class of Admission