NSC EB1B PP 0214 NOID 求助# Immigration - 落地生根
C*n
1 楼
背景：
本人是物理专业PH.D，在互联网公司工作好几年了，H1B六年只剩最后一年了，因跳槽
家庭等原因，惭愧今年才有机会办EB1B，也一直未办EB2。现在被NOID，只有一个月时
间回复，很着急，赶紧发帖求助大家。
文章：6篇（3篇一作，其中一篇PRL，引用140+)，总引用280+，一作引用200+
审稿：仅2篇不同物理杂志的
推荐信：6篇（4篇独立，其中两篇来自引用文章教授）
今年7月的时候弗拉格曼律师说是挺强的case，公司支持H1B就开始着手办理。推荐信
到8月底草稿准备好了，律师又花了3周才弄好，中间我催过一次。拿到所有签字后律师
又花了两三周到10月31号才寄出去。今天收到USCIS的office 0214的回复了：
Criteria Analysis
Met 3 criteria:
* Evidence of allien's ... as judge of the work of others
* Evidence of allien's original scientific or scholarly research
contributions ...
* Evidence of the alien's authorship of articles ...
Failed to:
* Published material in prof publications written by others about the alien'
s work in the academic field. 8 CFR 204.5(i)(3)(i)(C)
Final Merits Analysis
信里说：虽满足至少两项，也要看质量，咱就来着重分析：
1. You offer citations as evidence, but we don't recognize citations as
evidence for this criterion, because his work must be the focus of published
material, not simply citations of his work.因此此项不算。
2. 审稿太少，不能establish participation in the widespread pr process,也没被
杂志编辑认可。
3. 推荐信主要说他的research ability很强，但是没有阐明how he is recognized
internationally as outstanding in the academic field (oiaf)，而且推荐信也不
是presumptive evidence。（感觉这里律师没有上心，我写好后给她改了，发现6篇内
容都相似，都是high level夸我research很强，反而把我先写的一些具体从我文章获取
了啥benifit的段落删了）
4. 虽然发表了6篇，但没阐明how such a production is indicative of someone who
is recognized internationally as oiaf. 虽然有Google scholar引用数字，其中两
篇140+和40+引用虽高，但是还是没阐明how these numbers reflect that he is
recognized internationally as oiaf. Although citations show that his
research has received attention, you have not established how they set him
apart from rest of the academic field.（其实那篇PRL引用里面有review文章，专
门整段介绍我的工作）
遇到0214运气固然差，但感觉律师不靠谱，好端端的case给弄废了，从Final Merits
Analysis就看得出来。特别是想起催她修改推荐信后两天就发来了，删掉了我写的某些
具体内容，更是这样觉得，可惜当时并没有太在意。已经这样了，真诚求助大家的建议
。弗拉格曼的律师专门给我安排了一个meeting，但我想先听听大家的意见，现在该怎
么办？非常感谢！
本人是物理专业PH.D，在互联网公司工作好几年了，H1B六年只剩最后一年了，因跳槽
家庭等原因，惭愧今年才有机会办EB1B，也一直未办EB2。现在被NOID，只有一个月时
间回复，很着急，赶紧发帖求助大家。
文章：6篇（3篇一作，其中一篇PRL，引用140+)，总引用280+，一作引用200+
审稿：仅2篇不同物理杂志的
推荐信：6篇（4篇独立，其中两篇来自引用文章教授）
今年7月的时候弗拉格曼律师说是挺强的case，公司支持H1B就开始着手办理。推荐信
到8月底草稿准备好了，律师又花了3周才弄好，中间我催过一次。拿到所有签字后律师
又花了两三周到10月31号才寄出去。今天收到USCIS的office 0214的回复了：
Criteria Analysis
Met 3 criteria:
* Evidence of allien's ... as judge of the work of others
* Evidence of allien's original scientific or scholarly research
contributions ...
* Evidence of the alien's authorship of articles ...
Failed to:
* Published material in prof publications written by others about the alien'
s work in the academic field. 8 CFR 204.5(i)(3)(i)(C)
Final Merits Analysis
信里说：虽满足至少两项，也要看质量，咱就来着重分析：
1. You offer citations as evidence, but we don't recognize citations as
evidence for this criterion, because his work must be the focus of published
material, not simply citations of his work.因此此项不算。
2. 审稿太少，不能establish participation in the widespread pr process,也没被
杂志编辑认可。
3. 推荐信主要说他的research ability很强，但是没有阐明how he is recognized
internationally as outstanding in the academic field (oiaf)，而且推荐信也不
是presumptive evidence。（感觉这里律师没有上心，我写好后给她改了，发现6篇内
容都相似，都是high level夸我research很强，反而把我先写的一些具体从我文章获取
了啥benifit的段落删了）
4. 虽然发表了6篇，但没阐明how such a production is indicative of someone who
is recognized internationally as oiaf. 虽然有Google scholar引用数字，其中两
篇140+和40+引用虽高，但是还是没阐明how these numbers reflect that he is
recognized internationally as oiaf. Although citations show that his
research has received attention, you have not established how they set him
apart from rest of the academic field.（其实那篇PRL引用里面有review文章，专
门整段介绍我的工作）
遇到0214运气固然差，但感觉律师不靠谱，好端端的case给弄废了，从Final Merits
Analysis就看得出来。特别是想起催她修改推荐信后两天就发来了，删掉了我写的某些
具体内容，更是这样觉得，可惜当时并没有太在意。已经这样了，真诚求助大家的建议
。弗拉格曼的律师专门给我安排了一个meeting，但我想先听听大家的意见，现在该怎
么办？非常感谢！
