关于无印良品不下架商品，问题还是在中国身上# Joke - 肚皮舞运动
t*u
1 楼
【 以下文字转载自 I140 讨论区 】
发信人: tinnywhu (Jamesyfl), 信区: I140
标 题: NSC EB1A PP RFE by 0242。弱case，求帮助！
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Oct 7 11:16:41 2016, 美东)
EB1A+Direct PP
律师：wegreen
文章：11
引用：92 (now is 97)
专业：计算材料
方向：玻璃
review：30+ in 14 journals (IF 1~8)
推荐性：6封(2 dependent, 4 independent)；美国5封，瑞典1封
无专利，无媒体报道
IO: 0242
Claim老三样，contribution没有通过
RD: 9/26/2016
PP: 9/28/2016
RFE:10/05/2016
具体的notice如下：
Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, artistic,
athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the
field.
The criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. The record shows that the beneficiary
has authored or co-authored 11 publications. The record lacks evidence that
the work is recognized internationally. Please explain the significance of
the publications in which the articles appeared and submit evidence of the
impact of the beneficiary's work in the field. The bulk of the reference
letters provide general praise for the beneficiary with little discussion of
the significance of the contributions made by the beneficiary. Please
submit evidence of the importance of the beneficiary's contributions to the
field.
The record dose not contain evidence that the beneficiary's work is widely
cited by others in the field or leaded to significant changes in others work
. The USCIS notes the record indicates some of the beneficiary's work is
cited. While this shows that the beneficiary's work has had some impact on
the field of endeavor, this is not indicative that the beneficiary is
outstanding in the specific academic area. The beneficiary may have original
contributions in his field, but such contributions are expected in his
field and do not separate him from the rest of this field as extraordinary.
To assist in determining whether the beneficiary's contributions are
original and major significance in this field, the petitioner may submit:
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary's
contribution to the field.
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
beneficiary's work important.
Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the beneficiary'
s contributions of major significance.
Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contributions has provoked
widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
contracts with companies; licensed technology; patents currently being
utilized.
RFE Strategies:
1. 加入油灯图
2. 区分自引和他引？
3. 将自己的引用率和专家做比较？
4. 新的推荐信(加入具体的对我工作的讨论)
5. Testimony letters from experts (证明我工作的重要性)
6. 挖掘自己工作对别人工作的影响
希望大家帮忙看看，多谢啦！
发信人: tinnywhu (Jamesyfl), 信区: I140
标 题: NSC EB1A PP RFE by 0242。弱case，求帮助！
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Oct 7 11:16:41 2016, 美东)
EB1A+Direct PP
律师：wegreen
文章：11
引用：92 (now is 97)
专业：计算材料
方向：玻璃
review：30+ in 14 journals (IF 1~8)
推荐性：6封(2 dependent, 4 independent)；美国5封，瑞典1封
无专利，无媒体报道
IO: 0242
Claim老三样，contribution没有通过
RD: 9/26/2016
PP: 9/28/2016
RFE:10/05/2016
具体的notice如下：
Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, artistic,
athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the
field.
The criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. The record shows that the beneficiary
has authored or co-authored 11 publications. The record lacks evidence that
the work is recognized internationally. Please explain the significance of
the publications in which the articles appeared and submit evidence of the
impact of the beneficiary's work in the field. The bulk of the reference
letters provide general praise for the beneficiary with little discussion of
the significance of the contributions made by the beneficiary. Please
submit evidence of the importance of the beneficiary's contributions to the
field.
The record dose not contain evidence that the beneficiary's work is widely
cited by others in the field or leaded to significant changes in others work
. The USCIS notes the record indicates some of the beneficiary's work is
cited. While this shows that the beneficiary's work has had some impact on
the field of endeavor, this is not indicative that the beneficiary is
outstanding in the specific academic area. The beneficiary may have original
contributions in his field, but such contributions are expected in his
field and do not separate him from the rest of this field as extraordinary.
To assist in determining whether the beneficiary's contributions are
original and major significance in this field, the petitioner may submit:
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary's
contribution to the field.
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
beneficiary's work important.
Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the beneficiary'
s contributions of major significance.
Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contributions has provoked
widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
contracts with companies; licensed technology; patents currently being
utilized.
RFE Strategies:
1. 加入油灯图
2. 区分自引和他引？
3. 将自己的引用率和专家做比较？
4. 新的推荐信(加入具体的对我工作的讨论)
5. Testimony letters from experts (证明我工作的重要性)
6. 挖掘自己工作对别人工作的影响
希望大家帮忙看看，多谢啦！
