Follow up -- Re: Urgent question (转载)# Law - 律师事务所
l*a
1 楼
【 以下文字转载自 Automobile 讨论区 】
发信人: lia (追梦人), 信区: Automobile
标 题: Follow up -- Re: Urgent question
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Oct 3 21:40:27 2006)
Today, this guy replied to me:
"The presumption in most state laws, including Illinois law, is that cars in
good working condition will function properly for at least 30 days. If
they don't, the burden of proof is on the seller that the buyer damaged the
car within those 30 days. And you will find it hard to prove that I did
anything to the car, especially
发信人: lia (追梦人), 信区: Automobile
标 题: Follow up -- Re: Urgent question
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Oct 3 21:40:27 2006)
Today, this guy replied to me:
"The presumption in most state laws, including Illinois law, is that cars in
good working condition will function properly for at least 30 days. If
they don't, the burden of proof is on the seller that the buyer damaged the
car within those 30 days. And you will find it hard to prove that I did
anything to the car, especially
