Re: 加州高速警察疯了-更新：撤销罚单，钱退回了 (转载)# Law - 律师事务所
m*2
1 楼
请问哪个股票软件可以显示个人资产的历史数据和变化呀？我在用君安的锐智，找不到
这个功能，只能显示当日的资产总额。
这个功能，只能显示当日的资产总额。
y*6
2 楼
代友发，请直接回复其联系邮箱，thanks～
招聘单位：某中型保险公司资产管理部
招聘职位：投资/研究相关岗位
职位类别：全职
工作地点：北京
招聘人数：1人
任职要求：
1、国内外正规大学本科及以上学历
2、具有海外的投资/研究/财务3年的相关经历（香港市场的经历更佳）
3、对股票/债券/衍生品有较强的兴趣
4、良好的中英文表达能力
5、有优秀的再学习能力和团队合作精神
6、如果被录用，希望2个月内能够入职
联系方式：
请将简历以附件形式至C******[email protected]，邮件标题请注明“姓名-性别-毕业院校-当
前职业”谢谢！
招聘单位：某中型保险公司资产管理部
招聘职位：投资/研究相关岗位
职位类别：全职
工作地点：北京
招聘人数：1人
任职要求：
1、国内外正规大学本科及以上学历
2、具有海外的投资/研究/财务3年的相关经历（香港市场的经历更佳）
3、对股票/债券/衍生品有较强的兴趣
4、良好的中英文表达能力
5、有优秀的再学习能力和团队合作精神
6、如果被录用，希望2个月内能够入职
联系方式：
请将简历以附件形式至C******[email protected]，邮件标题请注明“姓名-性别-毕业院校-当
前职业”谢谢！
p*x
3 楼
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
rafter0158 (rafter) 于 (Tue Jul 1 22:17:27 2008) 提到:
里面本来有1美元，被gas公司自动扣的bill，现在成负的了（早就关联了新卡，但这次
bill还是从这个帐户扣了），已经从Ing转钱过去补救，但还要几天才能到帐吧。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
shelway (@[email protected]) 于 (Tue Jul 1 22:18:20 2008) 提到:
yes
overdraft, call or email to ask for waiver
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
tombyuan (tombyuan) 于 (Tue Jul 1 22:27:38 2008) 提到:
应该是会有overdraft费用，打电话去看能不能给免了。
我在Key有过类似的经历，被扣$33overdraft，打电话过去给免了一半。
☆──────────
rafter0158 (rafter) 于 (Tue Jul 1 22:17:27 2008) 提到:
里面本来有1美元，被gas公司自动扣的bill，现在成负的了（早就关联了新卡，但这次
bill还是从这个帐户扣了），已经从Ing转钱过去补救，但还要几天才能到帐吧。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
shelway (@[email protected]) 于 (Tue Jul 1 22:18:20 2008) 提到:
yes
overdraft, call or email to ask for waiver
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
tombyuan (tombyuan) 于 (Tue Jul 1 22:27:38 2008) 提到:
应该是会有overdraft费用，打电话去看能不能给免了。
我在Key有过类似的经历，被扣$33overdraft，打电话过去给免了一半。
☆──────────
v*s
4 楼
大家去买呀！
A*0
5 楼
嗯
t*k
6 楼
想翻墙到国内，将自己电脑设置为大陆的免费开放ip地址，据说需要借助翻墙软件如
VPN，故求推荐。谢谢
VPN，故求推荐。谢谢
a*i
7 楼
我都开出去1mile了才找到...
k*u
8 楼
【 以下文字转载自 Automobile 讨论区 】
发信人: kuku (小黄猫), 信区: Automobile
标 题: Re: 加州高速警察疯了-更新：撤销罚单，钱退回了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jul 16 15:20:46 2015, 美东)
下面是偶给法官写的，供大家参考。
xx(month) xx(date),2015
Trial by Written Declaration regarding citation xxxxxxxxx
Your Honor,
My written declaration is as follows. I declare under penalty of perjury
that this statement is true and correct. In addition to this statement and a
copy of the citation, there are 13 exhibits attached. Each exhibit has a
number for reference. The relevant information is also circled or
highlighted. The photos on the exhibits are from Google Earth, and have been
verified by another drive-by observation for their accuracy.
At about xx(time) on xx(day), xx(month and date), 2015, I entered I5
Northbound from xxx(road), xxx(city) (point A on exhibit 2). I climbed and
accelerated through the on-ramp, then changed lane into the freeway at point
C. I was pulled over by a CHP officer right after the lane change. The
officer told me that the reason he stopped me is that there is a “
regulatory sign” requiring me to exit. He gave me a citation then let me go.
I later drove the same segment of the freeway to review the road signs. The
findings are illustrated on exhibits 3 through 6. Exhibit 3 shows what a
driver sees after the end of the on-ramp. Four (4) signs are present: the
partially covered “Detour Ahead”, “Through Traffic Merge Left”; a
diamond-shaped “Right Lane Must Exit” on yellow background (more on this
later), and a sign with slippery graphics. After the slippery sign, the next
signs are the green overhead information signs about xxx(road) (exhibit 6).
The violation on the citation reads: “VC21461 (a) OFFICIAL TRAFFIC SIGN OR
SIGNAL”.
California Vehicle Code 21461(a) reads: It is unlawful for a driver of a
vehicle to fail to obey a sign or signal “defined as regulatory” in the
federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device, or Department of
Transportation… (rest of the text omitted. See exhibit 1 for complete text.
)
There is no word “OFFICIAL” in the code text, but I will consider it
interchangeable with the word “regulatory” there. I also understand that
the manual should be the California adopted version: California MUTCD.
The officer’s remark and the citation text both point to the “Right Lane
Must Exit” sign (exhibit 4). No other possible regulatory sign was present.
I will therefore focus the rest of my declaration on the validity of this
sign (subject sign).
Per California MUTCD, regulatory series shall use rectangular shape (exhibit
7). The subject sign has a diamond shape, therefore does not meet the
requirement of a regulatory sign on shape.
Also, regulatory signs shall use black, blue, red, or white as background
colors (exhibit 8). The subject sign has a yellow background, therefore does
not meet the requirement of a regulatory sign on color.
The only legal “Right Lane Must Exit” sign shall be sign R18A (CA) (
exhibit 9), with a rectangular shape and white background. The subject sign
has a diamond shape and yellow background. It’s not a regulatory sign,
therefore.
A driver shall be allowed to rely on the shape and color to decide the type
of the traffic sign ahead before he/she can read the text. The subject sign
therefore would be reasonably expected to be recognized as a warning sign
because of its conformance on shape and background color. An example is W73
(CA) (Exhibit 12). It has very similar language: “Right Lane Exit Ahead”;
and it’s a warning sign.
Furthermore, California MUTCD says that “The R18A (CA) sign shall be placed
at the beginning of the 8 inch solid white line approaching the exit ramp”
(exhibit 10 and 11). The subject sign is located 725 feet before the
required location (exhibit 5). It should also be noted that CA DOT Highway
Design Manual requires a minimum of 2000 feet weaving length for freeway
entry/exit (exhibit 13). Given the already inadequate total available
dimension, it would be extremely unreasonable and dangerous to require
drivers to weave into the freeway within 660 feet (the distance between
point A and B), even if a valid R18A(CA) sign were to be installed at point
B and to be enforced.
Your Honor, the subject sign has wrong shape, wrong color, and wrong
location to be deemed a valid “regulatory sign”. The charge against me,
therefore, is unfounded. I kindly request the court to dismiss the case
based on the findings and reasoning presented above.
Faithfully yours,
小黄猫
发信人: kuku (小黄猫), 信区: Automobile
标 题: Re: 加州高速警察疯了-更新：撤销罚单，钱退回了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jul 16 15:20:46 2015, 美东)
下面是偶给法官写的，供大家参考。
xx(month) xx(date),2015
Trial by Written Declaration regarding citation xxxxxxxxx
Your Honor,
My written declaration is as follows. I declare under penalty of perjury
that this statement is true and correct. In addition to this statement and a
copy of the citation, there are 13 exhibits attached. Each exhibit has a
number for reference. The relevant information is also circled or
highlighted. The photos on the exhibits are from Google Earth, and have been
verified by another drive-by observation for their accuracy.
At about xx(time) on xx(day), xx(month and date), 2015, I entered I5
Northbound from xxx(road), xxx(city) (point A on exhibit 2). I climbed and
accelerated through the on-ramp, then changed lane into the freeway at point
C. I was pulled over by a CHP officer right after the lane change. The
officer told me that the reason he stopped me is that there is a “
regulatory sign” requiring me to exit. He gave me a citation then let me go.
I later drove the same segment of the freeway to review the road signs. The
findings are illustrated on exhibits 3 through 6. Exhibit 3 shows what a
driver sees after the end of the on-ramp. Four (4) signs are present: the
partially covered “Detour Ahead”, “Through Traffic Merge Left”; a
diamond-shaped “Right Lane Must Exit” on yellow background (more on this
later), and a sign with slippery graphics. After the slippery sign, the next
signs are the green overhead information signs about xxx(road) (exhibit 6).
The violation on the citation reads: “VC21461 (a) OFFICIAL TRAFFIC SIGN OR
SIGNAL”.
California Vehicle Code 21461(a) reads: It is unlawful for a driver of a
vehicle to fail to obey a sign or signal “defined as regulatory” in the
federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device, or Department of
Transportation… (rest of the text omitted. See exhibit 1 for complete text.
)
There is no word “OFFICIAL” in the code text, but I will consider it
interchangeable with the word “regulatory” there. I also understand that
the manual should be the California adopted version: California MUTCD.
The officer’s remark and the citation text both point to the “Right Lane
Must Exit” sign (exhibit 4). No other possible regulatory sign was present.
I will therefore focus the rest of my declaration on the validity of this
sign (subject sign).
Per California MUTCD, regulatory series shall use rectangular shape (exhibit
7). The subject sign has a diamond shape, therefore does not meet the
requirement of a regulatory sign on shape.
Also, regulatory signs shall use black, blue, red, or white as background
colors (exhibit 8). The subject sign has a yellow background, therefore does
not meet the requirement of a regulatory sign on color.
The only legal “Right Lane Must Exit” sign shall be sign R18A (CA) (
exhibit 9), with a rectangular shape and white background. The subject sign
has a diamond shape and yellow background. It’s not a regulatory sign,
therefore.
A driver shall be allowed to rely on the shape and color to decide the type
of the traffic sign ahead before he/she can read the text. The subject sign
therefore would be reasonably expected to be recognized as a warning sign
because of its conformance on shape and background color. An example is W73
(CA) (Exhibit 12). It has very similar language: “Right Lane Exit Ahead”;
and it’s a warning sign.
Furthermore, California MUTCD says that “The R18A (CA) sign shall be placed
at the beginning of the 8 inch solid white line approaching the exit ramp”
(exhibit 10 and 11). The subject sign is located 725 feet before the
required location (exhibit 5). It should also be noted that CA DOT Highway
Design Manual requires a minimum of 2000 feet weaving length for freeway
entry/exit (exhibit 13). Given the already inadequate total available
dimension, it would be extremely unreasonable and dangerous to require
drivers to weave into the freeway within 660 feet (the distance between
point A and B), even if a valid R18A(CA) sign were to be installed at point
B and to be enforced.
Your Honor, the subject sign has wrong shape, wrong color, and wrong
location to be deemed a valid “regulatory sign”. The charge against me,
therefore, is unfounded. I kindly request the court to dismiss the case
based on the findings and reasoning presented above.
Faithfully yours,
小黄猫
l*3
9 楼
。。。
庆祝元宵节。。。恩。。。
庆祝元宵节。。。恩。。。
C*i
10 楼
嗯，不吵了，我回来了
【在 A****0 的大作中提到】
: 嗯
【在 A****0 的大作中提到】
: 嗯
t*k
11 楼
求推荐可以访问大陆的VPN，最好是免费的。谢谢
b*r
12 楼
我第一次出去半路上吊线了，再也没信号
于是又买了个Garmin 255w
找星速度极快，信号稳定
【在 a********i 的大作中提到】
: 我都开出去1mile了才找到...
于是又买了个Garmin 255w
找星速度极快，信号稳定
【在 a********i 的大作中提到】
: 我都开出去1mile了才找到...
k*u
13 楼
上面是我写的书面辩论。
写得多了些，当然结果达到了，罚单被撤销了。
大律师们给提提写作上的意见，比如从法律辩论的角度来讲，前半部分（色彩和形状不
对）已经很清楚的情况下，后半部分的追打（位置、长度等）是否有必要。
a
【在 k**u 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Automobile 讨论区 】
: 发信人: kuku (小黄猫), 信区: Automobile
: 标 题: Re: 加州高速警察疯了-更新：撤销罚单，钱退回了
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jul 16 15:20:46 2015, 美东)
: 下面是偶给法官写的，供大家参考。
: xx(month) xx(date),2015
: Trial by Written Declaration regarding citation xxxxxxxxx
: Your Honor,
: My written declaration is as follows. I declare under penalty of perjury
: that this statement is true and correct. In addition to this statement and a
写得多了些，当然结果达到了，罚单被撤销了。
大律师们给提提写作上的意见，比如从法律辩论的角度来讲，前半部分（色彩和形状不
对）已经很清楚的情况下，后半部分的追打（位置、长度等）是否有必要。
a
【在 k**u 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Automobile 讨论区 】
: 发信人: kuku (小黄猫), 信区: Automobile
: 标 题: Re: 加州高速警察疯了-更新：撤销罚单，钱退回了
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jul 16 15:20:46 2015, 美东)
: 下面是偶给法官写的，供大家参考。
: xx(month) xx(date),2015
: Trial by Written Declaration regarding citation xxxxxxxxx
: Your Honor,
: My written declaration is as follows. I declare under penalty of perjury
: that this statement is true and correct. In addition to this statement and a
i*a
14 楼
我有caneles和macaron吃～
【在 v******s 的大作中提到】
: 大家去买呀！
【在 v******s 的大作中提到】
: 大家去买呀！
C*i
15 楼
也没有人帮我
【在 A****0 的大作中提到】
: 嗯
【在 A****0 的大作中提到】
: 嗯
t*1
16 楼
baiduvpn.com 大陆VPN
w*3
17 楼
2个gps比较好
s*0
18 楼
提醒了我，冰箱里还有圣诞节的chocolate
【在 v******s 的大作中提到】
: 大家去买呀！
【在 v******s 的大作中提到】
: 大家去买呀！
A*0
19 楼
吵吧,发泄发泄也好
【在 C***i 的大作中提到】
: 嗯，不吵了，我回来了
【在 C***i 的大作中提到】
: 嗯，不吵了，我回来了
t*k
20 楼
谢谢，包月需要支付宝来支付，我没有支付宝的嘛，人又在米国，baiduvpn.com有无免
费的试用期？
【在 t*******1 的大作中提到】
: baiduvpn.com 大陆VPN
费的试用期？
【在 t*******1 的大作中提到】
: baiduvpn.com 大陆VPN
A*0
21 楼
他们都打不过你
我都想帮他们了
【在 C***i 的大作中提到】
: 也没有人帮我
我都想帮他们了
【在 C***i 的大作中提到】
: 也没有人帮我
e*t
22 楼
you are asking too much, dude.
【在 t******k 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢，包月需要支付宝来支付，我没有支付宝的嘛，人又在米国，baiduvpn.com有无免
: 费的试用期？
【在 t******k 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢，包月需要支付宝来支付，我没有支付宝的嘛，人又在米国，baiduvpn.com有无免
: 费的试用期？
C*i
23 楼
我不回吵架，吵不过他们
【在 A****0 的大作中提到】
: 吵吧,发泄发泄也好
【在 A****0 的大作中提到】
: 吵吧,发泄发泄也好
K*a
24 楼
恩，我们骂神去。
【在 A****0 的大作中提到】
: 他们都打不过你
: 我都想帮他们了
【在 A****0 的大作中提到】
: 他们都打不过你
: 我都想帮他们了
C*i
25 楼
明明是他们欺负我
【在 A****0 的大作中提到】
: 他们都打不过你
: 我都想帮他们了
【在 A****0 的大作中提到】
: 他们都打不过你
: 我都想帮他们了
相关阅读
F1->H4 questions, pls help恳请帮助Claim soccial security tax back & H1 app求助：如何写律师信和与保险公司打官司，学法律的XDJM请看过来没有法律学习工作经验能不能申请LLM?Business Law Notes-5再问Re: LLM+Bar admissionOPT 紧急求助law firm的secretary/assistant 大概起薪是多少啊？怎么开.com?LLM+Bar admissionCopyright On Internet & How Lawyers Bill求助：车祸赔偿今天去考了LSATBusiness Law Notes 9-13Business Law Notes-1中国政法大学许传玺教授当选美国法律研究院的院士-----又一个骗子第一次到法庭定了下次Trial(第一次)的时间, 能推迟吗?Business Law Notes-7Rehnquist Sees Threat to Judiciary