【在 m*********t 的大作中提到】 : Check how many EB2c is pending after 2007, : and check how many EB2I is pending, : then you should know. : DO your homework before asking.
m*t
17 楼
Not because "就是因为B2C没有EB2I多," Because number of pending EB2c is close to its annual quota. 奥八马和国会议员are你儿子, not mine. If you don't have brain, shut up!
【在 m*********t 的大作中提到】 : Not because "就是因为B2C没有EB2I多," : Because number of pending EB2c is close to its annual quota. : 奥八马和国会议员are你儿子, not mine. : If you don't have brain, shut up! : : current,
t*1
19 楼
close to its annual quota 又怎么样? 从 2007 到 2011年的老中EB2 加家属,至少一万吧? EB2 限额是2800。 奥八马有什么理由可以下令让老中current, 同时还不让老印current? 你要是有脑子,就不会有这种愚蠢的想法了。
【在 m*********t 的大作中提到】 : Not because "就是因为B2C没有EB2I多," : Because number of pending EB2c is close to its annual quota. : 奥八马和国会议员are你儿子, not mine. : If you don't have brain, shut up! : : current,
m*t
20 楼
Check this one..see how the others talk about you ;) I will ignore all your posts. Don't want to waste my time!!! aslo, people who support 27% will agree my piont. also, are you bipolar? why posted different view on the same issue?? 发信人: tmd001 (The Movie Depot), 信区: EB23 标 题: Re: 再论27%制度化的可能性 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 30 21:03:55 2011, 美东) 我支持你。这个不涉及法律法规的修改,简单易行,家庭类移民已经有这个先例,奥傻完全应该采用同样的标准对待家庭类和职业类移民。 发信人: cnus (会飞的猪), 信区: EB23 标 题: Re: 再论27%制度化的可能性 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 30 14:24:45 2011, 美东) EB2CURRENT可能性是在27%制度化后,逐年往上升,不知道为什么很多人看不到这 点。
【在 m*********t 的大作中提到】 : Check this one..see how the others talk about you ;) : I will ignore all your posts. : Don't want to waste my time!!! : aslo, people who support 27% will agree my piont. : also, are you bipolar? why posted different view on the same issue?? : 发信人: tmd001 (The Movie Depot), 信区: EB23 : 标 题: Re: 再论27%制度化的可能性 : 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 30 21:03:55 2011, 美东) : 我支持你。这个不涉及法律法规的修改,简单易行,家庭类移民已经有这个先例,奥傻完全应该采用同样的标准对待家庭类和职业类移民。 : 发信人: cnus (会飞的猪), 信区: EB23
【在 m*********t 的大作中提到】 : Check this one..see how the others talk about you ;) : I will ignore all your posts. : Don't want to waste my time!!! : aslo, people who support 27% will agree my piont. : also, are you bipolar? why posted different view on the same issue?? : 发信人: tmd001 (The Movie Depot), 信区: EB23 : 标 题: Re: 再论27%制度化的可能性 : 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 30 21:03:55 2011, 美东) : 我支持你。这个不涉及法律法规的修改,简单易行,家庭类移民已经有这个先例,奥傻完全应该采用同样的标准对待家庭类和职业类移民。 : 发信人: cnus (会飞的猪), 信区: EB23
【在 m*********t 的大作中提到】 : Check how many EB2c is pending after 2007, : and check how many EB2I is pending, : then you should know. : DO your homework before asking.
【在 m*********t 的大作中提到】 : Check this one..see how the others talk about you ;) : I will ignore all your posts. : Don't want to waste my time!!! : aslo, people who support 27% will agree my piont. : also, are you bipolar? why posted different view on the same issue?? : 发信人: tmd001 (The Movie Depot), 信区: EB23 : 标 题: Re: 再论27%制度化的可能性 : 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 30 21:03:55 2011, 美东) : 我支持你。这个不涉及法律法规的修改,简单易行,家庭类移民已经有这个先例,奥傻完全应该采用同样的标准对待家庭类和职业类移民。 : 发信人: cnus (会飞的猪), 信区: EB23
m*t
42 楼
Wow. You don't need to agree what I said, but can you stop the other saying what they want to say?? "内容没有任何理论基础." so for all your posts. Let's wait for two more years, see who was misleading.