k*s
2 楼
正确的做法是一个相机,不一定是现在手机的模样,但是能上网和打电话。
D*3
6 楼
残幅传感器手机行不?
G*2
10 楼
说明你对照相机一知半解. :-)
Actually, with current technologies, it shouldn’t be too difficult to stuff
a larger image sensor, such as 1” image sensor, into a normal cellphone
body (and 能放进裤兜). The issue / problem is not the image sensor itself,
rather the matching workable lens for that sensor. In general, the larger
the image sensor, the bigger the lens. And this is dictated by the laws of
physics and optics.
Just look Panasonic Lumix DMC-CM1 (and Nokia 808 PureView as well for that
matter), the predominate part is the lens. Even for iPhones, from iPhone 5
to iPhone 6, the image sensor changes / enlarges from 1/3.2” to 1/3”, and
the lens on iPhone 6 has to stick out.
So, your question may or should be the other way around: if someone can
develop a mini portable P & S camera that 能放进裤兜, like a cellphone, with
a 1” image sensor, plus the communication capabilities (phone, Wi-Fi, GPS,
and etc.), then ...
But personally, I’m not sure that will happen, again, because of the limits
of laws of physics and optics. And it will be inherently expensive,
pricewise, since a large image sensor with a big lens is already a costly
proposition, not to mention throwing in phone chip / modem, GPS, and so on.
【在 d******a 的大作中提到】
: 说明你对市场一知半解
: 按照松下自己的说法,这不是能照像的手机,而是能通话的照相机
: 所以,这根本不是我说的手机
: 卖不出去是因为太贵而且不是手机
Actually, with current technologies, it shouldn’t be too difficult to stuff
a larger image sensor, such as 1” image sensor, into a normal cellphone
body (and 能放进裤兜). The issue / problem is not the image sensor itself,
rather the matching workable lens for that sensor. In general, the larger
the image sensor, the bigger the lens. And this is dictated by the laws of
physics and optics.
Just look Panasonic Lumix DMC-CM1 (and Nokia 808 PureView as well for that
matter), the predominate part is the lens. Even for iPhones, from iPhone 5
to iPhone 6, the image sensor changes / enlarges from 1/3.2” to 1/3”, and
the lens on iPhone 6 has to stick out.
So, your question may or should be the other way around: if someone can
develop a mini portable P & S camera that 能放进裤兜, like a cellphone, with
a 1” image sensor, plus the communication capabilities (phone, Wi-Fi, GPS,
and etc.), then ...
But personally, I’m not sure that will happen, again, because of the limits
of laws of physics and optics. And it will be inherently expensive,
pricewise, since a large image sensor with a big lens is already a costly
proposition, not to mention throwing in phone chip / modem, GPS, and so on.
【在 d******a 的大作中提到】
: 说明你对市场一知半解
: 按照松下自己的说法,这不是能照像的手机,而是能通话的照相机
: 所以,这根本不是我说的手机
: 卖不出去是因为太贵而且不是手机
相关阅读
佛爷,求教一个izumar 镜头的信息请问tamron 18-250 for canon怎么样?哪里有好的N Flash教程?拍胶片的照片怎么保存?我昨天梦到FUJIFILM X100的售价了Sigma 50-200mm f/4.0-5.6 DC IF SLD OS Lens $159 at Amazon感光板有灰尘了,大家是怎么搞得?大马兔,大马三和小马四的45点对焦是同样的产品吗?想烧一个国产球头D9000还是有升级空间的“全幅”这个中文翻译得很差啊奶康D700 $1800怎么样?330474141842xchric 封 paat 在 PhotoGear 版本版脑残太多请推荐一款 LED 可以翻转的 傻瓜机35mm 视角还行。Canon S95还是Panasonic lx3这个靠谱么,一个卖家说在伊拉克的美军军事基地今天去给客户拍婚纱(卖婚纱的)