h*e
2 楼
当然有，就是不好parallel，现在industry的研究方向是functional language +
transactional memory。
【在 c****m 的大作中提到】
: 你觉得面向对象这个思想有什么大的缺点么？
transactional memory。
【在 c****m 的大作中提到】
: 你觉得面向对象这个思想有什么大的缺点么？
g*g
3 楼
Maybe 50 years, when AI is good enough to use human language
for programming.
【在 c****m 的大作中提到】
: 你觉得面向对象这个思想有什么大的缺点么？
for programming.
【在 c****m 的大作中提到】
: 你觉得面向对象这个思想有什么大的缺点么？
P*e
4 楼
It is said AI is least industrial needed area, right now
maybe better than bioinfo
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: Maybe 50 years, when AI is good enough to use human language
: for programming.
maybe better than bioinfo
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: Maybe 50 years, when AI is good enough to use human language
: for programming.
c*m
5 楼
谁说的？Google，微软，不是在搞自然语言搜索引擎嘛？！
【在 P********e 的大作中提到】
: It is said AI is least industrial needed area, right now
: maybe better than bioinfo
【在 P********e 的大作中提到】
: It is said AI is least industrial needed area, right now
: maybe better than bioinfo
N*n
6 楼
OO doesn't quite sit well with SOA
【在 c****m 的大作中提到】
: 你觉得面向对象这个思想有什么大的缺点么？
【在 c****m 的大作中提到】
: 你觉得面向对象这个思想有什么大的缺点么？
n*w
7 楼
阐述一下？是用于不同层面的东西?
【在 N********n 的大作中提到】
: OO doesn't quite sit well with SOA
【在 N********n 的大作中提到】
: OO doesn't quite sit well with SOA
m*t
8 楼
Because SOA is basically the not-so-good old C functions+structs dressed up
with XML?
【在 N********n 的大作中提到】
: OO doesn't quite sit well with SOA
N*n
9 楼
Very good, I like the way you put it.
up
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: Because SOA is basically the not-so-good old C functions+structs dressed up
: with XML?
up
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: Because SOA is basically the not-so-good old C functions+structs dressed up
: with XML?
N*n
10 楼
SOA has to worry about network traffic. Too much interaction between
two remote objects becomes chatty and drags down the performance. In
pure OO you don't care about chattiness that much.
【在 n*w 的大作中提到】
: 阐述一下？是用于不同层面的东西?
two remote objects becomes chatty and drags down the performance. In
pure OO you don't care about chattiness that much.
【在 n*w 的大作中提到】
: 阐述一下？是用于不同层面的东西?
g*g
11 楼
Don't worry, will see OO SOA soon.
up
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: Because SOA is basically the not-so-good old C functions+structs dressed up
: with XML?
up
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: Because SOA is basically the not-so-good old C functions+structs dressed up
: with XML?
c*t
12 楼
Erh, you mean RMI?
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: Don't worry, will see OO SOA soon.
:
: up
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: Don't worry, will see OO SOA soon.
:
: up
m*t
13 楼
My problem with SOA is not that it recognizes network traffic as a major
issue and tries to address it - that's a good thing. I just don't agree
that the traffic issue has to be addressed at the _interface_ level.
IOW, we can still have OO service interfaces, which have implementations
that take care of aggregating remote invocations and all other sorts of
optimization.
Also, I think the concept of SOA, like many other things these days, is
being abused. It was intended only for coarse graine
【在 N********n 的大作中提到】
: SOA has to worry about network traffic. Too much interaction between
: two remote objects becomes chatty and drags down the performance. In
: pure OO you don't care about chattiness that much.
相关阅读
国产软件为啥这么流氓程序员专用的记事本应用 Quiver Promotion ($1.99, TwoDollar T (转载)Startup现状分析 (转载)mitbbs 封 TeacherWei 在 Programming 版 (转载)老魏，其实我就是古德霸，你把小报告发给hr吧再次苦口婆心劝告某些人，第一要谨言慎行，第二别不要脸The best app!! (转载)看来Apple hire by reputation本科学历马工当然也能做得比CS PhD牛逼今天很开心！给大家点开心的话题Uber干掉传统出租车, Nest干掉HoneyWell和GE我发现你们居然可以翻回一两年前的帖子其实举报有用么？认真问一下wdongp*hub宣布进军IoT你们别吵了好虫老魏你们这俩SB就不能合作么？vert.x 3.1 视频 be reactive on the JVM but not only in Java by Clement Escoffier/Paulo Lopes老魏，其实我就是wdong老魏，你做平台的思路有问题