Bachus Urges Regulators Not to Rigidly Implement Volcker Rule (wsj) - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Stock

Bachus Urges Regulators Not to Rigidly Implement Volcker Rule (wsj)

Bachus Urges Regulators Not to Rigidly Implement Volcker Rule (wsj)# Stock

f*t2010-11-04 07:11

1 楼

【以下文字转载自 Working 讨论区】
发信人: zoos (), 信区: Working
标题: 公司隐婚的一对情侣因别人举报被开除了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Jan 13 01:59:29 2016, 美东)
不知道你们所在的公司是不是允许夫妻同在一个公司，我所在的公司就是这样的。今天
有一对公司隐婚的同事因为被同事举报之后被开除了，这件事对我来说虽然没什么影响
，但是看着他们夫妻双双失业，心里还是感觉怪怪的，于是想说道说道。举报他们的是
跟夫妻俩同在一个部门的人，是那个男的下属，想必这俩人被开之后，他该马上上位了
。其实我们之前都发现了，他们两口子之间关系匪浅。夫妻俩都在一个公司上班，要想
人不知实在是太难了。稍微一些蛛丝马迹就能暴露无疑。但碍于他们俩都否认已婚，我
们也不好说什么。年底公司压力大，再加上今年效益不太好。公司高层是有裁员的意向
，恰好这个时候被同一部门的同时钻了孔子，首当其冲举报了这件事情。平时领导对于
这些事情也是睁一只眼闭一只眼，但是这个紧要关头，既然已经有人举报了，那就不能
做事不管了。于是分别找两人谈话了，谈完话回来就看到这两口子在收拾东西了，大家
都私下纷纷议论他们是被开除了。果不其然，第二天他们就没来上班。我们也收到了一
封他们两口子发的公开信，信上内容大概就是讲他们不该隐瞒已经结婚并在同一单位上
班的事情，但是他们并没有对公司造成麻烦。事情就这样结束了，但对我们也算是个警
醒吧，提醒我们要注意有的公司是真的不愿意夫妻同在一家公司。但是对我来说，我并
没有觉得在同一家公司有什么不好。我觉得只要是真心相爱的，两人在一个单位是件好
事！不仅可以有事一起商量，一起拿主意，还能相互理解对方！而且还避免了恶意竞争
。真不知道这些领导都是怎么想的。

g*y2010-11-04 07:11

2 楼

only can pump a tiny tiny bit each time.
Got so worried, should I give up breast milk and only do formula?
Look forward to hearing suggestions.
Big thanks!!!

c*y2010-11-04 07:11

3 楼

Bachus Urges Regulators Not to Rigidly Implement Volcker Rule
By DEBORAH SOLOMON
WASHINGTON-—Rep. Spencer Bachus, the Alabama Republican competing for the
reins of the House Financial Services Committee, warned regulators not to "
rigidly" implement a new rule aimed at curbing banks' risk-taking ability,
saying it will impose "substantial costs" on the economy.
Mr. Bachus's opposition to the Volcker rule, named after former Federal
Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker who also is an Obama administration adviser,
isn't new but his comments have taken on importance given the committee's
role in overseeing many of the regulators who will define its scope. Already
, some Republican lawmakers are suggesting they will seek to influence the
rules that must be written as part of the financial-regulatory overhaul
passed this year through frequent oversight of regulators and by potentially
squeezing agency budgets.
The Volcker rule sought to prevent banks from putting a firm's capital at
risk by prohibiting proprietary trading and banning certain relationships
with hedge funds and private-equity funds.
In a letter to regulators, Mr. Bachus said proprietary trading "had
virtually nothing to do with the crisis." He wrote it is "therefore doubtful
that the Volcker Rule will make the U.S. financial system any more stable"
and warned it would place U.S. firms at a competitive disadvantage with
global peers who aren't subject to the same restrictions.
More
* Document: Bachus' letter on Volcker Rule
Regulators are discussing how best to implement the provision, which was
written broadly and leaves much to the interpretation of the Federal Reserve
, the Securities and Exchange Commission and other agencies that must
jointly study and implement it. Among the most critical tasks will be
defining certain activities, such as "market making-related activities,"
which are exempted under the law.
Mr. Bachus didn't provide specific recommendations on how to define such
activities but said regulators should consider banks' bottom lines when
determining how strictly to write the rules. He said the Volcker rule "will
remove a primary source of income diversification for U.S. institutions."
His view is in contrast to that of many Democrats, as well as Mr. Volcker.
In a letter to regulators this week, Mr. Volcker said regulators need to
limit banks' ability to exploit loopholes by writing concise definitions
while also giving broad latitude to examiners.
The new Financial Stability Oversight Council, which is led by the Treasury
Department and comprises various regulators, is required under the law to
study the Volcker rule and provide recommendations on its implementation by
the end of January. Regulators then have another nine months to write the
actual rules.
Last month, the council solicited public comment on the rule, and
submissions are due by the end of Friday.
Write to Deborah Solomon at d*************[email protected]

r*f2010-11-04 07:11

4 楼

小孩多大了？我那时候头一个月根本pump不出来什么，硬着头皮胸喂，
到第六周才算好歹一次pump了4oz出来，自认达到了供需平衡，呵呵。现在回头看，
小孩很快就胖的脸都方了。

【在 g**********y 的大作中提到】

: only can pump a tiny tiny bit each time.
: Got so worried, should I give up breast milk and only do formula?
: Look forward to hearing suggestions.
: Big thanks!!!

g*y2010-11-04 07:11

5 楼

thanks for the reponse... got more confident. The baby is only 10 days. Do I
still have hope to produce more?

r*f2010-11-04 07:11

6 楼

definitely! just drink water as much as you could. it's suggested by the OB
and very helpful.

I

【在 g**********y 的大作中提到】

: thanks for the reponse... got more confident. The baby is only 10 days. Do I
: still have hope to produce more?

g*y2010-11-04 07:11

7 楼

thanks for the reponse... got more confident. The baby is only 10 days. Do I
still have hope to produce more?