Apple tv dream revealed.# Apple - 家有苹果
y*q
1 楼
赞日本吸能车这个设计理念，无人能比。
估计丰田司机的头和腿都保不住了。
有小孩的家长买车最好不要买日本车，美德韩都比日本车结实的多。
估计丰田司机的头和腿都保不住了。
有小孩的家长买车最好不要买日本车，美德韩都比日本车结实的多。
S*d
2 楼
http://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-apple-tv-2012-3
Over the last several months, Apple's vision for television has become
clearer.
Thanks to work by Wall Street analyst Gene Munster on the hardware side and
the New York Post's Claire Atkinson on the content and cable side, we now
have a pretty good picture of what Apple wants to do:
Build a TV set that is much cooler and easier to use than anything else out
there
Charge twice as much for it
Assemble a "virtual cable company" with boatloads of great content by
cutting deals with content providers
Pay the content providers practically nothing
Reduce cable companies to "dumb pipes" by redesigning and taking control
over the television interface
Capture a subscription revenue stream that the cable companies now own
That seems to be the vision.
Whether Apple will actually be able to execute this vision, of course, is a
different story.
According to Claire Atkinson of the Post, Apple's Eddie Cue recently
approached cable companies to try to get them to dump their ugly cable boxes
and let Apple redesign the "accessibility and look" of the TV interface and
help manage "bandwidth" usage over the cable networks.
The cable companies, not surprisingly, assumed that Cue and Apple were
smoking crack and told them to get lost.
Apple has also been meeting directly with content companies (some of which
are owned by cable companies) to try to cut content-delivery deals. Apple's
pitch is that it will transform the channels into apps that will be
available across all of its devices.
It's not clear whether Apple would charge for each app, or bundle them like
a cable company. It's also not clear whether the apps would be "channels"
or individual "shows." (The latter would be much better for consumers, but
it would scare the bejesus out of content networks, which make money by
packaging lots of shows into a network that they charge for.)
According to Atkinson's sources at the content companies, Apple's
negotiating stance is as follows:
“We decide the price, we decide what content."... They want everything for
nothing.
In other words, Apple appears to be approaching content providers in the TV
industry the same way it approached content providers in the music and book-
publishing worlds. Namely:
Give us your content and let us package it in the way we (and consumers)
want
Let us charge what we want for it
Take what we give you
Similarly, Apple is approaching TV distributors—cable companies—the same
way it approached magazine and newspaper publishers. Namely:
Let us take over your relationships with your customers
Let us redesign and control the interface through which your customers get
your service
Let us otherwise gradually convert you into a "dumb pipe."
Meanwhile, Apple is building a TV set that analyst Gene Munster thinks will
be "the biggest thing in consumer electronics since the smartphone."
Miniinthebox
The iPad 3 is coming next week. Click picture for the latest rumors....
This TV, Gene says, will change the way consumers consume content. To
picture what it looks like, he tells us to "imagine a sheet of glass," with
"no bevels or edges." This TV, Gene has previously said, will cost twice as
much as a regular TV.
So...
Apple's dream appears to be very close to every consumer's dream, which is "
Let me watch what I want to watch when I want to watch it without paying an
arm and a leg for it."
Because this dream is powerful and logical, consumers will support it. And
we have no doubt that, eventually, the dream will become reality.
However, standing in the way of the dream becoming reality is the massive,
extremely rich, and extremely threatened TV industry, one that has resources
and power that the puny music companies, book publishers, and magazine and
newspaper publishers can only, well, dream of.
Unless Apple is willing to fork over billions and billions of dollars in
content fees, we think Apple will face fierce resistance from content
providers in its plan to transform their content into "apps."
Unless Apple is willing to allow cable companies to keep control of their
customers, we think it will face fierce resistance from cable companies in
its plan to change the "accessibility and look" of the TV interface.
And, unless Apple figures out how to win over both content providers AND
cable companies, we think consumers may well resist paying twice as much for
Apple TVs as they pay for regular TVs, regardless of how cool the Apple TVs
look (Yes, a "sheet of glass" with no bevels or edges sounds really cool.
But TVs already look pretty cool).
Now, Apple doesn't have to win this war all at once, of course.
And winning all at once is presumably not its plan.
Also, Apple has a huge, secret weapon in this war, a weapon that gets
stronger all the time.
What's that weapon?
Hundreds of millions of iPhone and iPad owners, all of whom would love to
watch TV content on their iPhones and iPads and don't currently have
convenient ways to do it.
In the next year or two, Apple can sell a few million TVs, cut some content
deals, offer an "alternative" interface that the cable companies can't
control and start to try to win over consumers and build up negotiating
leverage that way.
And, in a few years, when Apple's tens of millions of TV customers can be
lumped together with hundreds of millions of iPhone and iPad users, and
consumers have gotten used to "what I want when I want it," Apple will have
some serious negotiating leverage.
That's probably Apple's plan.
And it's a smart plan.
But if Apple manages to execute that plan, it will destroy the economics and
power of today's TV industry, both on the content side and the distribution
side.
And don't think the TV industry doesn't know that.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-apple-tv-2012-3#ixzz1nzCZ4Zo3
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb - 中文网站浏览器
Over the last several months, Apple's vision for television has become
clearer.
Thanks to work by Wall Street analyst Gene Munster on the hardware side and
the New York Post's Claire Atkinson on the content and cable side, we now
have a pretty good picture of what Apple wants to do:
Build a TV set that is much cooler and easier to use than anything else out
there
Charge twice as much for it
Assemble a "virtual cable company" with boatloads of great content by
cutting deals with content providers
Pay the content providers practically nothing
Reduce cable companies to "dumb pipes" by redesigning and taking control
over the television interface
Capture a subscription revenue stream that the cable companies now own
That seems to be the vision.
Whether Apple will actually be able to execute this vision, of course, is a
different story.
According to Claire Atkinson of the Post, Apple's Eddie Cue recently
approached cable companies to try to get them to dump their ugly cable boxes
and let Apple redesign the "accessibility and look" of the TV interface and
help manage "bandwidth" usage over the cable networks.
The cable companies, not surprisingly, assumed that Cue and Apple were
smoking crack and told them to get lost.
Apple has also been meeting directly with content companies (some of which
are owned by cable companies) to try to cut content-delivery deals. Apple's
pitch is that it will transform the channels into apps that will be
available across all of its devices.
It's not clear whether Apple would charge for each app, or bundle them like
a cable company. It's also not clear whether the apps would be "channels"
or individual "shows." (The latter would be much better for consumers, but
it would scare the bejesus out of content networks, which make money by
packaging lots of shows into a network that they charge for.)
According to Atkinson's sources at the content companies, Apple's
negotiating stance is as follows:
“We decide the price, we decide what content."... They want everything for
nothing.
In other words, Apple appears to be approaching content providers in the TV
industry the same way it approached content providers in the music and book-
publishing worlds. Namely:
Give us your content and let us package it in the way we (and consumers)
want
Let us charge what we want for it
Take what we give you
Similarly, Apple is approaching TV distributors—cable companies—the same
way it approached magazine and newspaper publishers. Namely:
Let us take over your relationships with your customers
Let us redesign and control the interface through which your customers get
your service
Let us otherwise gradually convert you into a "dumb pipe."
Meanwhile, Apple is building a TV set that analyst Gene Munster thinks will
be "the biggest thing in consumer electronics since the smartphone."
Miniinthebox
The iPad 3 is coming next week. Click picture for the latest rumors....
This TV, Gene says, will change the way consumers consume content. To
picture what it looks like, he tells us to "imagine a sheet of glass," with
"no bevels or edges." This TV, Gene has previously said, will cost twice as
much as a regular TV.
So...
Apple's dream appears to be very close to every consumer's dream, which is "
Let me watch what I want to watch when I want to watch it without paying an
arm and a leg for it."
Because this dream is powerful and logical, consumers will support it. And
we have no doubt that, eventually, the dream will become reality.
However, standing in the way of the dream becoming reality is the massive,
extremely rich, and extremely threatened TV industry, one that has resources
and power that the puny music companies, book publishers, and magazine and
newspaper publishers can only, well, dream of.
Unless Apple is willing to fork over billions and billions of dollars in
content fees, we think Apple will face fierce resistance from content
providers in its plan to transform their content into "apps."
Unless Apple is willing to allow cable companies to keep control of their
customers, we think it will face fierce resistance from cable companies in
its plan to change the "accessibility and look" of the TV interface.
And, unless Apple figures out how to win over both content providers AND
cable companies, we think consumers may well resist paying twice as much for
Apple TVs as they pay for regular TVs, regardless of how cool the Apple TVs
look (Yes, a "sheet of glass" with no bevels or edges sounds really cool.
But TVs already look pretty cool).
Now, Apple doesn't have to win this war all at once, of course.
And winning all at once is presumably not its plan.
Also, Apple has a huge, secret weapon in this war, a weapon that gets
stronger all the time.
What's that weapon?
Hundreds of millions of iPhone and iPad owners, all of whom would love to
watch TV content on their iPhones and iPads and don't currently have
convenient ways to do it.
In the next year or two, Apple can sell a few million TVs, cut some content
deals, offer an "alternative" interface that the cable companies can't
control and start to try to win over consumers and build up negotiating
leverage that way.
And, in a few years, when Apple's tens of millions of TV customers can be
lumped together with hundreds of millions of iPhone and iPad users, and
consumers have gotten used to "what I want when I want it," Apple will have
some serious negotiating leverage.
That's probably Apple's plan.
And it's a smart plan.
But if Apple manages to execute that plan, it will destroy the economics and
power of today's TV industry, both on the content side and the distribution
side.
And don't think the TV industry doesn't know that.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-apple-tv-2012-3#ixzz1nzCZ4Zo3
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb - 中文网站浏览器
m*o
3 楼
动量守恒，这个日本车看起来就要比奔驰小一个块头。
【在 y***q 的大作中提到】
: 赞日本吸能车这个设计理念，无人能比。
: 估计丰田司机的头和腿都保不住了。
: 有小孩的家长买车最好不要买日本车，美德韩都比日本车结实的多。
【在 y***q 的大作中提到】
: 赞日本吸能车这个设计理念，无人能比。
: 估计丰田司机的头和腿都保不住了。
: 有小孩的家长买车最好不要买日本车，美德韩都比日本车结实的多。
l*n
4 楼
This is a pretty hard battle for Apple. Unless they really know the
pressure point.
pressure point.
p*g
5 楼
哈哈，貌似很早就看过这个图片，拜车版fans我老公所赐，所以我家是不买日本车的
【在 y***q 的大作中提到】
: 赞日本吸能车这个设计理念，无人能比。
: 估计丰田司机的头和腿都保不住了。
: 有小孩的家长买车最好不要买日本车，美德韩都比日本车结实的多。
【在 y***q 的大作中提到】
: 赞日本吸能车这个设计理念，无人能比。
: 估计丰田司机的头和腿都保不住了。
: 有小孩的家长买车最好不要买日本车，美德韩都比日本车结实的多。
w*2
6 楼
"The cable companies, not surprisingly, assumed that Cue and Apple were
smoking crack and told them to get lost."
lol
and
out
a
boxes
and
s
like
for
TV
book-
will
with
as
"
an
resources
and
for
TVs
content
have
and
distribution
【在 S***d 的大作中提到】
: http://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-apple-tv-2012-3
: Over the last several months, Apple's vision for television has become
: clearer.
: Thanks to work by Wall Street analyst Gene Munster on the hardware side and
: the New York Post's Claire Atkinson on the content and cable side, we now
: have a pretty good picture of what Apple wants to do:
: Build a TV set that is much cooler and easier to use than anything else out
: there
: Charge twice as much for it
: Assemble a "virtual cable company" with boatloads of great content by
smoking crack and told them to get lost."
lol
and
out
a
boxes
and
s
like
for
TV
book-
will
with
as
"
an
resources
and
for
TVs
content
have
and
distribution
【在 S***d 的大作中提到】
: http://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-apple-tv-2012-3
: Over the last several months, Apple's vision for television has become
: clearer.
: Thanks to work by Wall Street analyst Gene Munster on the hardware side and
: the New York Post's Claire Atkinson on the content and cable side, we now
: have a pretty good picture of what Apple wants to do:
: Build a TV set that is much cooler and easier to use than anything else out
: there
: Charge twice as much for it
: Assemble a "virtual cable company" with boatloads of great content by
f*s
7 楼
呵呵。道理都懂，可是求便宜实惠的中国人太多了。
【在 y***q 的大作中提到】
: 赞日本吸能车这个设计理念，无人能比。
: 估计丰田司机的头和腿都保不住了。
: 有小孩的家长买车最好不要买日本车，美德韩都比日本车结实的多。
【在 y***q 的大作中提到】
: 赞日本吸能车这个设计理念，无人能比。
: 估计丰田司机的头和腿都保不住了。
: 有小孩的家长买车最好不要买日本车，美德韩都比日本车结实的多。
w*2
8 楼
感觉还是没有新料暴出来。
and
out
a
boxes
and
s
like
for
TV
book-
will
with
as
"
an
resources
and
for
TVs
content
have
and
distribution
【在 S***d 的大作中提到】
: http://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-apple-tv-2012-3
: Over the last several months, Apple's vision for television has become
: clearer.
: Thanks to work by Wall Street analyst Gene Munster on the hardware side and
: the New York Post's Claire Atkinson on the content and cable side, we now
: have a pretty good picture of what Apple wants to do:
: Build a TV set that is much cooler and easier to use than anything else out
: there
: Charge twice as much for it
: Assemble a "virtual cable company" with boatloads of great content by
and
out
a
boxes
and
s
like
for
TV
book-
will
with
as
"
an
resources
and
for
TVs
content
have
and
distribution
【在 S***d 的大作中提到】
: http://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-apple-tv-2012-3
: Over the last several months, Apple's vision for television has become
: clearer.
: Thanks to work by Wall Street analyst Gene Munster on the hardware side and
: the New York Post's Claire Atkinson on the content and cable side, we now
: have a pretty good picture of what Apple wants to do:
: Build a TV set that is much cooler and easier to use than anything else out
: there
: Charge twice as much for it
: Assemble a "virtual cable company" with boatloads of great content by
c*7
9 楼
是否日车都叫吸能车？
【在 y***q 的大作中提到】
: 赞日本吸能车这个设计理念，无人能比。
: 估计丰田司机的头和腿都保不住了。
: 有小孩的家长买车最好不要买日本车，美德韩都比日本车结实的多。
【在 y***q 的大作中提到】
: 赞日本吸能车这个设计理念，无人能比。
: 估计丰田司机的头和腿都保不住了。
: 有小孩的家长买车最好不要买日本车，美德韩都比日本车结实的多。
S*d
10 楼
Yeah, proves yet again that behind a successful device, a lot of business
dealing needs to be done.
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb - 中文网站浏览器
【在 l**n 的大作中提到】
: This is a pretty hard battle for Apple. Unless they really know the
: pressure point.
dealing needs to be done.
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb - 中文网站浏览器
【在 l**n 的大作中提到】
: This is a pretty hard battle for Apple. Unless they really know the
: pressure point.
B*1
11 楼
Well, if you saw those tiny smart cars running on highway, you would rather
drive a Corolla.
And if you saw those 18 wheelers smashing BMW's, you would rather drive a 28
wheeler!
The point is: unless you are driving the largest vehicle (and presumably the
safest as well), you are never safe enough.
So pick your poison based on your wherewithal to pay the bill!
drive a Corolla.
And if you saw those 18 wheelers smashing BMW's, you would rather drive a 28
wheeler!
The point is: unless you are driving the largest vehicle (and presumably the
safest as well), you are never safe enough.
So pick your poison based on your wherewithal to pay the bill!
p*9
12 楼
free Apple TV with 2 year contract ???? LOL
and
out
【在 S***d 的大作中提到】
: http://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-apple-tv-2012-3
: Over the last several months, Apple's vision for television has become
: clearer.
: Thanks to work by Wall Street analyst Gene Munster on the hardware side and
: the New York Post's Claire Atkinson on the content and cable side, we now
: have a pretty good picture of what Apple wants to do:
: Build a TV set that is much cooler and easier to use than anything else out
: there
: Charge twice as much for it
: Assemble a "virtual cable company" with boatloads of great content by
and
out
【在 S***d 的大作中提到】
: http://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-apple-tv-2012-3
: Over the last several months, Apple's vision for television has become
: clearer.
: Thanks to work by Wall Street analyst Gene Munster on the hardware side and
: the New York Post's Claire Atkinson on the content and cable side, we now
: have a pretty good picture of what Apple wants to do:
: Build a TV set that is much cooler and easier to use than anything else out
: there
: Charge twice as much for it
: Assemble a "virtual cable company" with boatloads of great content by
m*n
13 楼
楼主就是专门黑日车的, 这样的人这儿多了去了, 只是不太往这个版跑而已.
同等大小(其实corolla还小点)的车, corolla不如奔驰结实,
这难道不是再正常不过的一件事么? 楼主还非要特地来"说明"一下?
rather
28
the
【在 B******1 的大作中提到】
: Well, if you saw those tiny smart cars running on highway, you would rather
: drive a Corolla.
: And if you saw those 18 wheelers smashing BMW's, you would rather drive a 28
: wheeler!
: The point is: unless you are driving the largest vehicle (and presumably the
: safest as well), you are never safe enough.
: So pick your poison based on your wherewithal to pay the bill!
同等大小(其实corolla还小点)的车, corolla不如奔驰结实,
这难道不是再正常不过的一件事么? 楼主还非要特地来"说明"一下?
rather
28
the
【在 B******1 的大作中提到】
: Well, if you saw those tiny smart cars running on highway, you would rather
: drive a Corolla.
: And if you saw those 18 wheelers smashing BMW's, you would rather drive a 28
: wheeler!
: The point is: unless you are driving the largest vehicle (and presumably the
: safest as well), you are never safe enough.
: So pick your poison based on your wherewithal to pay the bill!
B*1
14 楼
的确如此。
不过话说回来，那奔驰造的车也是太磁实了。请看下面的链接：
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/PKU/31380219.html
【在 m**n 的大作中提到】
: 楼主就是专门黑日车的, 这样的人这儿多了去了, 只是不太往这个版跑而已.
: 同等大小(其实corolla还小点)的车, corolla不如奔驰结实,
: 这难道不是再正常不过的一件事么? 楼主还非要特地来"说明"一下?
:
: rather
: 28
: the
不过话说回来，那奔驰造的车也是太磁实了。请看下面的链接：
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/PKU/31380219.html
【在 m**n 的大作中提到】
: 楼主就是专门黑日车的, 这样的人这儿多了去了, 只是不太往这个版跑而已.
: 同等大小(其实corolla还小点)的车, corolla不如奔驰结实,
: 这难道不是再正常不过的一件事么? 楼主还非要特地来"说明"一下?
:
: rather
: 28
: the
p*g
15 楼
哈哈，这个不完全说明问题的，以我每天开高速一个半小时亲眼目睹的无数高速追尾事
件的经历来说，一般这样的追尾，受伤严重的都是后面的车。我老公整天混车版的，黑
日派是那个版的一大派。
【在 B******1 的大作中提到】
: 的确如此。
: 不过话说回来，那奔驰造的车也是太磁实了。请看下面的链接：
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/PKU/31380219.html
件的经历来说，一般这样的追尾，受伤严重的都是后面的车。我老公整天混车版的，黑
日派是那个版的一大派。
【在 B******1 的大作中提到】
: 的确如此。
: 不过话说回来，那奔驰造的车也是太磁实了。请看下面的链接：
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/PKU/31380219.html
S*g
16 楼
他这么个撞法，成这个效果没啥意外的。SUV底盘高，suv的bumper是下面受伤害。
去年我们开santa fe，被一老黑开个sedan在高速上轻轻的追了一下尾。我bumper上沾
了她的白漆，轻轻一擦就掉了，外面看不出来伤，从下面看，bumper的塑料壳裂了一小
条。老黑的sedan，引擎盖都卷起来了，bumper也歪了
倒是头对头对撞那个更说明问题。
【在 B******1 的大作中提到】
: 的确如此。
: 不过话说回来，那奔驰造的车也是太磁实了。请看下面的链接：
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/PKU/31380219.html
去年我们开santa fe，被一老黑开个sedan在高速上轻轻的追了一下尾。我bumper上沾
了她的白漆，轻轻一擦就掉了，外面看不出来伤，从下面看，bumper的塑料壳裂了一小
条。老黑的sedan，引擎盖都卷起来了，bumper也歪了
倒是头对头对撞那个更说明问题。
【在 B******1 的大作中提到】
: 的确如此。
: 不过话说回来，那奔驰造的车也是太磁实了。请看下面的链接：
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/PKU/31380219.html
p*g
17 楼
物理博士出马了，要不要给大家来个受力分析，动能动量守恒什么的？
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】
: 他这么个撞法，成这个效果没啥意外的。SUV底盘高，suv的bumper是下面受伤害。
: 去年我们开santa fe，被一老黑开个sedan在高速上轻轻的追了一下尾。我bumper上沾
: 了她的白漆，轻轻一擦就掉了，外面看不出来伤，从下面看，bumper的塑料壳裂了一小
: 条。老黑的sedan，引擎盖都卷起来了，bumper也歪了
: 倒是头对头对撞那个更说明问题。
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】
: 他这么个撞法，成这个效果没啥意外的。SUV底盘高，suv的bumper是下面受伤害。
: 去年我们开santa fe，被一老黑开个sedan在高速上轻轻的追了一下尾。我bumper上沾
: 了她的白漆，轻轻一擦就掉了，外面看不出来伤，从下面看，bumper的塑料壳裂了一小
: 条。老黑的sedan，引擎盖都卷起来了，bumper也歪了
: 倒是头对头对撞那个更说明问题。
B*1
18 楼
长见识了。
【在 p*******g 的大作中提到】
: 哈哈，这个不完全说明问题的，以我每天开高速一个半小时亲眼目睹的无数高速追尾事
: 件的经历来说，一般这样的追尾，受伤严重的都是后面的车。我老公整天混车版的，黑
: 日派是那个版的一大派。
【在 p*******g 的大作中提到】
: 哈哈，这个不完全说明问题的，以我每天开高速一个半小时亲眼目睹的无数高速追尾事
: 件的经历来说，一般这样的追尾，受伤严重的都是后面的车。我老公整天混车版的，黑
: 日派是那个版的一大派。
B*1
19 楼
又长见识了。
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】
: 他这么个撞法，成这个效果没啥意外的。SUV底盘高，suv的bumper是下面受伤害。
: 去年我们开santa fe，被一老黑开个sedan在高速上轻轻的追了一下尾。我bumper上沾
: 了她的白漆，轻轻一擦就掉了，外面看不出来伤，从下面看，bumper的塑料壳裂了一小
: 条。老黑的sedan，引擎盖都卷起来了，bumper也歪了
: 倒是头对头对撞那个更说明问题。
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】
: 他这么个撞法，成这个效果没啥意外的。SUV底盘高，suv的bumper是下面受伤害。
: 去年我们开santa fe，被一老黑开个sedan在高速上轻轻的追了一下尾。我bumper上沾
: 了她的白漆，轻轻一擦就掉了，外面看不出来伤，从下面看，bumper的塑料壳裂了一小
: 条。老黑的sedan，引擎盖都卷起来了，bumper也歪了
: 倒是头对头对撞那个更说明问题。
h*y
20 楼
难怪啊...以前我开那个大车的时候...后面一辆日本车撞上来.立刻完蛋了.
我的车完好无损...那时候觉得那车主蛮可怜的..
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】
: 他这么个撞法，成这个效果没啥意外的。SUV底盘高，suv的bumper是下面受伤害。
: 去年我们开santa fe，被一老黑开个sedan在高速上轻轻的追了一下尾。我bumper上沾
: 了她的白漆，轻轻一擦就掉了，外面看不出来伤，从下面看，bumper的塑料壳裂了一小
: 条。老黑的sedan，引擎盖都卷起来了，bumper也歪了
: 倒是头对头对撞那个更说明问题。
我的车完好无损...那时候觉得那车主蛮可怜的..
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】
: 他这么个撞法，成这个效果没啥意外的。SUV底盘高，suv的bumper是下面受伤害。
: 去年我们开santa fe，被一老黑开个sedan在高速上轻轻的追了一下尾。我bumper上沾
: 了她的白漆，轻轻一擦就掉了，外面看不出来伤，从下面看，bumper的塑料壳裂了一小
: 条。老黑的sedan，引擎盖都卷起来了，bumper也歪了
: 倒是头对头对撞那个更说明问题。
f*s
21 楼
撞汗马？岂不是自找苦吃！
【在 h***y 的大作中提到】
: 难怪啊...以前我开那个大车的时候...后面一辆日本车撞上来.立刻完蛋了.
: 我的车完好无损...那时候觉得那车主蛮可怜的..
【在 h***y 的大作中提到】
: 难怪啊...以前我开那个大车的时候...后面一辆日本车撞上来.立刻完蛋了.
: 我的车完好无损...那时候觉得那车主蛮可怜的..
k*o
22 楼
为什么受伤严重的是后面的车呢？ 难道不是车头重， 变形小， 追尾的话， 相同
的车， 应该是前面的车更惨吧？
【在 p*******g 的大作中提到】
: 哈哈，这个不完全说明问题的，以我每天开高速一个半小时亲眼目睹的无数高速追尾事
: 件的经历来说，一般这样的追尾，受伤严重的都是后面的车。我老公整天混车版的，黑
: 日派是那个版的一大派。
的车， 应该是前面的车更惨吧？
【在 p*******g 的大作中提到】
: 哈哈，这个不完全说明问题的，以我每天开高速一个半小时亲眼目睹的无数高速追尾事
: 件的经历来说，一般这样的追尾，受伤严重的都是后面的车。我老公整天混车版的，黑
: 日派是那个版的一大派。
m*k
23 楼
后面撞得过程中一些能量被吸收了阿。
【在 k****o 的大作中提到】
: 为什么受伤严重的是后面的车呢？ 难道不是车头重， 变形小， 追尾的话， 相同
: 的车， 应该是前面的车更惨吧？
【在 k****o 的大作中提到】
: 为什么受伤严重的是后面的车呢？ 难道不是车头重， 变形小， 追尾的话， 相同
: 的车， 应该是前面的车更惨吧？
p*1
24 楼
yes, the area which 能量被吸收 is in the front. The back area also has 能量
被吸收, but not so much.
【在 m**k 的大作中提到】
: 后面撞得过程中一些能量被吸收了阿。
被吸收, but not so much.
【在 m**k 的大作中提到】
: 后面撞得过程中一些能量被吸收了阿。
s*d
25 楼
日车黑堕落到跟一安全文明的高档奔驰比的地步了啊。
怎么不找个neon cavalier撞车的照片比。
怎么不找个neon cavalier撞车的照片比。
s*d
26 楼
p*g
27 楼
哈哈，我也说不好为什么，不是物理博士，也不精通车的构造，只是说我看见的事实，
几乎我见过所有的高速追尾，有些是同量级的，有些是轿车追SUV，都是前面的车后
bumper上有点划痕，或有点瘪，后面的车前盖都卷起来了，车灯，bumper碎片满地都是。
【在 k****o 的大作中提到】
: 为什么受伤严重的是后面的车呢？ 难道不是车头重， 变形小， 追尾的话， 相同
: 的车， 应该是前面的车更惨吧？
几乎我见过所有的高速追尾，有些是同量级的，有些是轿车追SUV，都是前面的车后
bumper上有点划痕，或有点瘪，后面的车前盖都卷起来了，车灯，bumper碎片满地都是。
【在 k****o 的大作中提到】
: 为什么受伤严重的是后面的车呢？ 难道不是车头重， 变形小， 追尾的话， 相同
: 的车， 应该是前面的车更惨吧？
相关阅读
Apple Announces 2012 Summer Filmmaking Camps for Kids买galaxy S II还是买iphone 4? (转载)Mozilla Working on 'Junior' Web Browser for iPadSurface发布后，Cook召集Apple所有中层领导开紧急会议！ (转载)Where the Giants of Tech Are Going Next问个2011 macbook pro的价格实体经济做实业？苹果目前最大的问题就是没有 search用了新RMBP的，说说电池如何used new iPad + 500 trade for early 2011 low end macbook proLeap Motion，好科幻……真诚求教GOOGLE CHROME CANARY PROBLEM$3000多竟然买了一个次品retina有哪个网站能直接用ipad看欧冠的？Your Cheat Sheet to Apple鈥檚 New GAME CHANGING Products也开会了Teardown of New MacBook Pro's Retina Display Reveals 'Engineering Marvel'腿论iphone和android手机选择，要长待机时间 (转载)[$$] Tech-Sector Payouts Are Set to Surge