d*s
2 楼
We have now received reports from 4 referees on your manuscript. As you will
see, the referees have raised serious criticisms that preclude publication
of your work at this stage in Nature Medicine. We have therefore closed your
file, so that you may submit your work elsewhere without further delay, if
so you choose.
The referees are somewhat split in their views of the interest of the work,
with referees #3 and #4 expressing interest in principle, whereas referee #2
feels that evidence that the findings are relevant to human disease would
be needed to increase the interest of the work, and referee #1 feels that
the advance is relatively modest. In addition, the referees feel that the
findings are somewhat preliminary and that a large amount of additional
experimentation would be needed, and also raise a number of serious
methodological concerns.
I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion. Although it
seems that extensive new experimental data would be needed to address the
referees' concerns, we would in principle be willing to consider a revised
version of this manuscript that did substantively address all of their
concerns, provided that the novelty of your submission has not been
compromised in the interim.
In case of an eventual resubmission, we will need, in addition to the
revised manuscript and figures, a detailed, point-by-point account of how
you have responded to each of the referees' comments. You can use the link
below to resubmit your manuscript:
http://
We hope you will find the referees' comments useful, and thank you for
giving us the opportunity to review your work.
see, the referees have raised serious criticisms that preclude publication
of your work at this stage in Nature Medicine. We have therefore closed your
file, so that you may submit your work elsewhere without further delay, if
so you choose.
The referees are somewhat split in their views of the interest of the work,
with referees #3 and #4 expressing interest in principle, whereas referee #2
feels that evidence that the findings are relevant to human disease would
be needed to increase the interest of the work, and referee #1 feels that
the advance is relatively modest. In addition, the referees feel that the
findings are somewhat preliminary and that a large amount of additional
experimentation would be needed, and also raise a number of serious
methodological concerns.
I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion. Although it
seems that extensive new experimental data would be needed to address the
referees' concerns, we would in principle be willing to consider a revised
version of this manuscript that did substantively address all of their
concerns, provided that the novelty of your submission has not been
compromised in the interim.
In case of an eventual resubmission, we will need, in addition to the
revised manuscript and figures, a detailed, point-by-point account of how
you have responded to each of the referees' comments. You can use the link
below to resubmit your manuscript:
http://
We hope you will find the referees' comments useful, and thank you for
giving us the opportunity to review your work.
a*n
3 楼
有。别写错理由，比如说帮带孩子啥的。
【在 r********e 的大作中提到】
: 第一次B2延期申请有被拒的吗？
【在 r********e 的大作中提到】
: 第一次B2延期申请有被拒的吗？
s*z
4 楼
it's re-submission, not bad.
good luck!
good luck!
r*e
5 楼
just said they need more time to travel and do shopping
相关阅读
Oncogene 封 squirrabbit 在 Biology 版NIBS的高绍荣是怎么tenure的？3分钟让你起鸡皮疙瘩!!! 绝对给力的好片!! (转载)我觉得将来很多基因治疗药物会是“病毒”近年回国的HHMI 有哪些？How to test protein stabilityHow to identify a receptor?拿到green card可以申请哪些grant或者fellowship大家有没有经历过这种情况？问下NIH 基金金额现在的生物学能不能人工制造一个简单的生命体。我有个建议现在生物的行情是啥？Paper Helppaper help!现在研究膜蛋白结构和功能关系的牛Lab有哪些？求一篇文章[from mainland]说一下我了解的法国研究系统。请问共同第一作者的顺序对将来申请绿卡有没有影响？paper help__Getting to the heart of regeneration in zebrafish