d*s
2 楼
We have now received reports from 4 referees on your manuscript. As you will
see, the referees have raised serious criticisms that preclude publication
of your work at this stage in Nature Medicine. We have therefore closed your
file, so that you may submit your work elsewhere without further delay, if
so you choose.
The referees are somewhat split in their views of the interest of the work,
with referees #3 and #4 expressing interest in principle, whereas referee #2
feels that evidence that the findings are relevant to human disease would
be needed to increase the interest of the work, and referee #1 feels that
the advance is relatively modest. In addition, the referees feel that the
findings are somewhat preliminary and that a large amount of additional
experimentation would be needed, and also raise a number of serious
methodological concerns.
I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion. Although it
seems that extensive new experimental data would be needed to address the
referees' concerns, we would in principle be willing to consider a revised
version of this manuscript that did substantively address all of their
concerns, provided that the novelty of your submission has not been
compromised in the interim.
In case of an eventual resubmission, we will need, in addition to the
revised manuscript and figures, a detailed, point-by-point account of how
you have responded to each of the referees' comments. You can use the link
below to resubmit your manuscript:
http://
We hope you will find the referees' comments useful, and thank you for
giving us the opportunity to review your work.
see, the referees have raised serious criticisms that preclude publication
of your work at this stage in Nature Medicine. We have therefore closed your
file, so that you may submit your work elsewhere without further delay, if
so you choose.
The referees are somewhat split in their views of the interest of the work,
with referees #3 and #4 expressing interest in principle, whereas referee #2
feels that evidence that the findings are relevant to human disease would
be needed to increase the interest of the work, and referee #1 feels that
the advance is relatively modest. In addition, the referees feel that the
findings are somewhat preliminary and that a large amount of additional
experimentation would be needed, and also raise a number of serious
methodological concerns.
I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion. Although it
seems that extensive new experimental data would be needed to address the
referees' concerns, we would in principle be willing to consider a revised
version of this manuscript that did substantively address all of their
concerns, provided that the novelty of your submission has not been
compromised in the interim.
In case of an eventual resubmission, we will need, in addition to the
revised manuscript and figures, a detailed, point-by-point account of how
you have responded to each of the referees' comments. You can use the link
below to resubmit your manuscript:
http://
We hope you will find the referees' comments useful, and thank you for
giving us the opportunity to review your work.
s*z
4 楼
it's re-submission, not bad.
good luck!
good luck!
r*e
5 楼
just said they need more time to travel and do shopping
相关阅读
A system for the continuous directed evolution of biomolecuRe: 高级博士后计划 (转载)总是梦见老鼠,怎么办?面试的两个实验室在一个research center该怎么办?急问几个问题,大家一定要帮我啊有没有昆虫学家?univerally immobilize proteins to microplate请问哪里能找到Brain MRI的图像资料?中国科学院强磁场科学中心副研究员招聘Re: 学生化的基最可悲 (转载)请问美国有治痛风的好药吗?0.1M Na/K phosphate, pH6.2怎么配?谢谢。免疫反应的强弱和antigen的量多少有关系么?anti-GAL4 AD antibody求PAPER!!!请推荐个Lentivirus vector吧,想表达两个基因...彻底没希望了吗?any factors affect splicing pattern?怎么在clustalW输入两个序列?luciferase assay control的问题