请教做晶体结构的前辈 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Biology - 生物学

请教做晶体结构的前辈

请教做晶体结构的前辈# Biology - 生物学

P*X2012-01-20 08:01

1 楼

书是我很喜欢的。一直觉得女一是Rebecca Ferguson演才对。不过看Emily Blunt演得
不错啊。演Megan的不够漂亮

b*e2012-01-20 08:01

2 楼

在把结构deposite到PDB的时候，authorship重要吗？
已经接受的paper上我是一作，PDB上的entry里我的名字变成了第二个
有人说PDB的authorship不重要，是这样的吗？
PS，印度人是世界上最恶心的人种，没有之一

C*m2012-01-20 08:01

3 楼

paper 上你是一作就可以了.

【在 b******e 的大作中提到】

: 在把结构deposite到PDB的时候，authorship重要吗？
: 已经接受的paper上我是一作，PDB上的entry里我的名字变成了第二个
: 有人说PDB的authorship不重要，是这样的吗？
: PS，印度人是世界上最恶心的人种，没有之一

t*o2012-01-20 08:01

4 楼

Credit wise, its not important. People rarely look at the author list in PDB
. However, if you are clearly the scientist responsible for this particular
structure, you should not be shy to ask for a correction. Just my 2 cents.
Note I am talking about this crystal structure, not the paper. He could be the second author on the paper, but if this is his structure, then he should be the first author in PDB. I regularly deposit structures with only mine and my boss's names, regardless of how many co-authors we have on the paper.

b*e2012-01-20 08:01

5 楼

多谢指教
这是我的project，从头到尾都是我做的，但是在解结构的时候没经验老板又想快些出
结构所以印度人插了进来，可以说大部分都是他解得
我一直默认pdb的author list跟paper上应该是一致的，印度人恶心在没有告诉任何人
的情况下自己就把author list改成了自己是第一。如果不重要的话就可以用不重要的
手段去应对了，肯定不能吃哑巴亏。
再一次谢谢了

PDB
particular
the second author on the paper, but if this is his structure, then he
should be the first author in PDB. I regularly deposit structures with only
mine and my boss's names, reg

【在 t***o 的大作中提到】

: Credit wise, its not important. People rarely look at the author list in PDB
: . However, if you are clearly the scientist responsible for this particular
: structure, you should not be shy to ask for a correction. Just my 2 cents.
: Note I am talking about this crystal structure, not the paper. He could be the second author on the paper, but if this is his structure, then he should be the first author in PDB. I regularly deposit structures with only mine and my boss's names, regardless of how many co-authors we have on the paper.

b*e2012-01-20 08:01

6 楼

谢谢指教

【在 C*********m 的大作中提到】

: paper 上你是一作就可以了.

t*o2012-01-20 08:01

7 楼

That's a tricky situation. Unfortunately it happens a lot in structural
groups. In the old days, solving a structure was not a routine task. I heard
of similar situations where the guy who solved the structure got the first
author of the paper. Consider yourself lucky that you are still the first
author on the paper. That's what matters to you. I wouldn't worry about it
anymore. Enjoy.

【在 b******e 的大作中提到】

: 多谢指教
: 这是我的project，从头到尾都是我做的，但是在解结构的时候没经验老板又想快些出
: 结构所以印度人插了进来，可以说大部分都是他解得
: 我一直默认pdb的author list跟paper上应该是一致的，印度人恶心在没有告诉任何人
: 的情况下自己就把author list改成了自己是第一。如果不重要的话就可以用不重要的
: 手段去应对了，肯定不能吃哑巴亏。
: 再一次谢谢了
:
: PDB
: particular