日本人造假 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Biology - 生物学

日本人造假

日本人造假# Biology - 生物学

n*42012-07-06 07:07

1 楼

An investigating committee in Japan has concluded that a Japanese
anesthesiologist, Yoshitaka Fujii, fabricated a whopping 172 papers over the
past 19 years.
Among the 172 papers judged bogus, the report claims that 126 studies of
randomized, double-blind, controlled trials "were totally fabricated." The
committee identified only three valid papers. For another 37 papers, the
panel could not conclusively determine if there had been fabrication.
http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/07/a-new-record-

f*x2012-07-06 07:07

2 楼

有不少小日本极其的不要脸。
老夫以前就收到某个休斯顿大学教授发来的检举信，
几个小日本向某会议提交了一篇跟我们很类似的文
章，方法，simulation都是我们的真子集，但是没
有任何的理论分析(我们的理论部分其实是文章的出
发点篇幅占了文章的几乎一半)。而我们的文章已经
在网上几个地方(包括系里技术报告)发布了好几个
月了 (事实上我们在网上发布时已经耽搁了好几个
月)，小日本装做不知道，所以那个教授认为小日
本是在抄袭。我们也是认为小日本在抄袭，可能时
间上来不及所以simulation也只做了一点点更不用
说任何的理论分析，由于小日本那篇文章太单薄了，
我们觉得无妨放了他们一马。结果更不要脸的事情
还在后面，差不多半年以后在某亚太会议上他们又
把我们文章中有的他们以前来不及做的拼凑成另一
篇文章。

the

【在 n*********4 的大作中提到】

: An investigating committee in Japan has concluded that a Japanese
: anesthesiologist, Yoshitaka Fujii, fabricated a whopping 172 papers over the
: past 19 years.
: Among the 172 papers judged bogus, the report claims that 126 studies of
: randomized, double-blind, controlled trials "were totally fabricated." The
: committee identified only three valid papers. For another 37 papers, the
: panel could not conclusively determine if there had been fabrication.
: http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/07/a-new-record-

d*y2012-07-06 07:07

3 楼

鬼子做研究还是可以的，但是他们有个毛病，好东西自己藏着，发表数据的时候故意弄
错，试验方法故意写错。

l*12012-07-06 07:07

4 楼

Science magszine 这周的web chat:
Is science becoming less honest? Join Retraction Watch in a live chat with
Science
A record-breaking year for retractions in 2011, a new record for retractions
by one person — what’s going on?
Ivan will be a guest for a live chat with Science magazine today at 3 p.m.
Eastern to discuss fraud, ethics, and retractions. Join him, University of
Virginia psychologist Brian Nosek, and Science reporter Martin Enserink —
who most recently reported on the case of Dirk Smeesters.
To participate in the chat,
//www.coveritlive.com/index.php?option=com_altcaster&task=siteviewaltcast&
altcast_code=7c6849abdd&height=550&width=600%22%20target=%22_blank
//retractionwatch.wordpress.com/