Why NYT, NPR and BBC cannot face the reality????? - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Biology - 生物学

Why NYT, NPR and BBC cannot face the reality?????

Why NYT, NPR and BBC cannot face the reality?????# Biology - 生物学

e*d2012-08-07 07:08

1 楼

我女朋友二十来岁，长得还算可以，但这却变成了我纠结的地方。她因为对自己的长相
还算自信，竟然要跑去整容做成网红脸去娱乐公司工作。
女友这个在我看来离奇的想法是产生在上个月的一天，那天我跟她在步行街逛街，她在
一家服装店试了新衣服出来之后被一个自称娱乐公司助理的人相中。那个男人上来就是
一顿夸赞，说我女朋友美丽大方，楚楚动人，并且马上推荐女友去他所在的公司面试主
播的职位。女孩子是最经不起夸奖的，我看女友当时尾巴都翘上天了。她二话不说就接
过了那个男人的电话，满口答应下来说有空就会去面试。
然而这只是个开始，女友真的跑去面试并且顺利通过了。她做了一个著名网站内的女主
播，其实就是大家口中的网红。我即使不愿意她做这份工作也没多表现出不满，谁知道
她后来竟然说要去整容，因为大家更喜欢她浓妆艳抹的样子。为了让自己自信一些，她
还打算去隆胸，就为了讨男性网友的喜爱。这不简直是赤裸裸的卖色吗！我一再要求她
赶紧辞了这份工作，可是她完全都没有听进去，我要怎么办才好啊！

l*72012-08-07 07:08

2 楼

Why NYT, NPR and BBC cannot face the reality?????
NATURE, as a top scientific journal, can face the scientific reality of
publishing an article, which humiliate a Chinese swimming athlete without
any sound scientific data and analysis. The official NATURE's Apology,
whether or not sufficient, is a great first step toward the scientific
justice, honest and being trustworthy. In contrast, the NYT, NPR and BBC
have done nothing so far for their roles of propaganda of racial
discrimination/bias. Can NYT, NPR and BBC provide sufficient, sound
scientific data and analysis to support their views??????

D*a2012-08-07 07:08

3 楼

没人去抗议啊
都忙着跑这儿来指责对nature太软弱呢。

I*a2012-08-07 07:08

4 楼

抗议没什么用，大炮才有用。
就是因为nature是个科学杂志，
抗议才有点点用，

a*d2012-08-07 07:08

5 楼

BBC actually did publish one article on this:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19116749

b*k2012-08-07 07:08

6 楼

yes, this is a good one. Katie Ledecky出来以后好像也有一篇对比的文章替叶说话

【在 a****d 的大作中提到】

: BBC actually did publish one article on this:
: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19116749

D*a2012-08-07 07:08

7 楼

不是很神奇么，还是那个 Dr Ross Tucker ，他到底说了些神马？
nature 难道活活把这句话删了？
还是相信这人突然改变了立场？
Dr Ross Tucker from the Sports Science Institute at the University of Cape
Town warns against reading too much into the comparison with Lochte.
"Lochte didn't swim [the last leg] as fast as some of the other men in that
same race. Ye's performance compared to the best men for that leg was maybe
not that impressive," he says.
"The point is," he says, "that analysing performance and trying to prove
doping is a futile task."

【在 a****d 的大作中提到】

: BBC actually did publish one article on this:
: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19116749

l*72012-08-07 07:08

8 楼

Western media's shameless racial discrimination
Negative drug tests cannot prove no doping !!!!!!!!!!!
This is the argument which has been frequently used and accepted in the
Western media.
Based on this argument, the western media attack any athletes they
discriminate.
I agree with this argument in that you need to suspect the people who have
the ability to do things or performed in an extra-ordinary manner.
However, there is a problem here. To the common people, all the Olympic
athletes are the people who do things or performe in an extra-ordinary
manner. Can we say all the Olympic athletes are involved in doping??? Can
we say that all the Olympic athletes will be proved doping someday by new
standards and new tests???? If you reason this way, the Olympic game
itself is doping
Therefore, the western media's racial discrimination is absolutely shameless
by selectively target a few athletes without any positive drug tests.
One way to counter them is whenever a western athlete won a medal, we say
doping, too.Because there is no other better way to counter their attack.
Well, this world is a racial world if we all do the things according to the
standard WESTERN MEIDA WAY.
The western media also promote many types of bias, discrimination and
threats, with the characteristics of mafia mentality. You can elaborate
more on these if you just pay a little attention when reading...
Therefore, the western media is a total trash!!!!!

【在 l*****7 的大作中提到】

: Why NYT, NPR and BBC cannot face the reality?????
: NATURE, as a top scientific journal, can face the scientific reality of
: publishing an article, which humiliate a Chinese swimming athlete without
: any sound scientific data and analysis. The official NATURE's Apology,
: whether or not sufficient, is a great first step toward the scientific
: justice, honest and being trustworthy. In contrast, the NYT, NPR and BBC
: have done nothing so far for their roles of propaganda of racial
: discrimination/bias. Can NYT, NPR and BBC provide sufficient, sound
: scientific data and analysis to support their views??????

l*72012-08-07 07:08

9 楼

?????