If you didn't receive a percentile but a score, at least for R01, it means your grant is not discussed i.e. below top 30-50% depending on the study section. Btw, convert your R21 to an R01, do not go for R21 especially for a new investigator.
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】 : If you didn't receive a percentile but a score, at least for R01, it means : your grant is not discussed i.e. below top 30-50% depending on the study : section. Btw, convert your R21 to an R01, do not go for R21 especially for : a new investigator.
T*y
10 楼
eRA Commons里面还没有.只有score, percentile还没出来可能。因为study section是 上周末才meet. 可能会和comment summary一起?
【在 s******y 的大作中提到】 : 在NIH eCommons 里面应该会写的啊
A*y
11 楼
Rewrite and submit as a new R01, unless you are funded for R21.
【在 T**********y 的大作中提到】 : 第一次投的时候按R21投的。现在还能够改成R01? : : for
T*y
12 楼
why R01 has a better chance than R21? BTW, just check NIAID website, except R01, all the rest award types only provide overall impact score, rather than percentile. The payline of R21 for this fiscal year is 23 (28 for last year). I am close, but out of the line.
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】 : Rewrite and submit as a new R01, unless you are funded for R21.
A*y
13 楼
Because R21 is rarely funded in many institutes. If you can get a R21, you grant is likely to be fundable as a R01. Also, R21 is 2 years without possibility of renewal. So you literally screw yourself twice if you got funded a R21. There are exceptions to this rule such as a very specific RFA from NIH.
If you didn't receive a percentile but a score, at least for R01, it means your grant is not discussed i.e. below top 30-50% depending on the study section. Btw, convert your R21 to an R01, do not go for R21 especially for a new investigator.
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】 : If you didn't receive a percentile but a score, at least for R01, it means : your grant is not discussed i.e. below top 30-50% depending on the study : section. Btw, convert your R21 to an R01, do not go for R21 especially for : a new investigator.
T*y
20 楼
eRA Commons里面还没有.只有score, percentile还没出来可能。因为study section是 上周末才meet. 可能会和comment summary一起?
【在 s******y 的大作中提到】 : 在NIH eCommons 里面应该会写的啊
A*y
21 楼
Rewrite and submit as a new R01, unless you are funded for R21.
【在 T**********y 的大作中提到】 : 第一次投的时候按R21投的。现在还能够改成R01? : : for
T*y
22 楼
why R01 has a better chance than R21? BTW, just check NIAID website, except R01, all the rest award types only provide overall impact score, rather than percentile. The payline of R21 for this fiscal year is 23 (28 for last year). I am close, but out of the line.
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】 : Rewrite and submit as a new R01, unless you are funded for R21.
A*y
23 楼
Because R21 is rarely funded in many institutes. If you can get a R21, you grant is likely to be fundable as a R01. Also, R21 is 2 years without possibility of renewal. So you literally screw yourself twice if you got funded a R21. There are exceptions to this rule such as a very specific RFA from NIH.
g*r
24 楼
I first trial of RO1 as mPI is successful. I have not got other NIH grants before.
【在 T**********y 的大作中提到】 : why R01 has a better chance than R21? : BTW, just check NIAID website, except R01, all the rest award types only : provide overall impact score, rather than percentile. The payline of R21 for : this fiscal year is 23 (28 for last year). I am close, but out of the line.