M*P
2 楼
Sequenom’s test, which uses DNA found in maternal blood samples to
determine certain fetal characteristics, avoids the risk of more invasive
tests, such as taking samples from
the fetus or placenta. The court ruled that detecting DNA in blood falls
under the US Supreme Court’s rule against patenting natural phenomena (Nat.
Biotechnol. 32, 403–404, 2014). While calling the test “a positive and
valuable contribution to science...[e]ven such valuable contributions
can fall short of statutory patentable subject matter, as it does here.”
Another judge wrote in a concurring opinion that though he was obligated to
invalidate the patent claims, “[b]ut for the sweeping language in the
Supreme Court’s
Mayo opinion, I see no reason, in policy or statute, why this
breakthrough invention should be deemed patent ineligible。
determine certain fetal characteristics, avoids the risk of more invasive
tests, such as taking samples from
the fetus or placenta. The court ruled that detecting DNA in blood falls
under the US Supreme Court’s rule against patenting natural phenomena (Nat.
Biotechnol. 32, 403–404, 2014). While calling the test “a positive and
valuable contribution to science...[e]ven such valuable contributions
can fall short of statutory patentable subject matter, as it does here.”
Another judge wrote in a concurring opinion that though he was obligated to
invalidate the patent claims, “[b]ut for the sweeping language in the
Supreme Court’s
Mayo opinion, I see no reason, in policy or statute, why this
breakthrough invention should be deemed patent ineligible。
k*o
4 楼
LOL,利好中国的测序工厂们。门槛没有了。
Nat.
to
【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: Sequenom’s test, which uses DNA found in maternal blood samples to
: determine certain fetal characteristics, avoids the risk of more invasive
: tests, such as taking samples from
: the fetus or placenta. The court ruled that detecting DNA in blood falls
: under the US Supreme Court’s rule against patenting natural phenomena (Nat.
: Biotechnol. 32, 403–404, 2014). While calling the test “a positive and
: valuable contribution to science...[e]ven such valuable contributions
: can fall short of statutory patentable subject matter, as it does here.”
: Another judge wrote in a concurring opinion that though he was obligated to
: invalidate the patent claims, “[b]ut for the sweeping language in the
Nat.
to
【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: Sequenom’s test, which uses DNA found in maternal blood samples to
: determine certain fetal characteristics, avoids the risk of more invasive
: tests, such as taking samples from
: the fetus or placenta. The court ruled that detecting DNA in blood falls
: under the US Supreme Court’s rule against patenting natural phenomena (Nat.
: Biotechnol. 32, 403–404, 2014). While calling the test “a positive and
: valuable contribution to science...[e]ven such valuable contributions
: can fall short of statutory patentable subject matter, as it does here.”
: Another judge wrote in a concurring opinion that though he was obligated to
: invalidate the patent claims, “[b]ut for the sweeping language in the
m*9
6 楼
被你称作文盲的律师表示:你肯定不知道35 USC 101,这个判决的background,以及要
怎么搞才能用分子诊断赚钱。
不过考虑到我们都是文盲了,就不给你解释了。
怎么搞才能用分子诊断赚钱。
不过考虑到我们都是文盲了,就不给你解释了。
w*o
8 楼
In this case, the patent lawyer didn't write the application right.
D*a
10 楼
楼主能否给文盲讲讲这个跟乳腺癌诊断那个划时代判决的区别在哪。当然我也可以自己
找找但是考虑到我是文盲找了估计也看不懂了。
找找但是考虑到我是文盲找了估计也看不懂了。
c*r
11 楼
利益集团博弈的结果,楼主以为人家文盲不懂,其实人家心里明镜似的,比你明白得多
了。
了。
F*p
12 楼
母体血DNA检测这个也不是seqeunom原创发明,是公认的科学应用,怎么能申请专利?
特有的protocol,equipment和reagent, analysis algorithem才可以申请专利。
特有的protocol,equipment和reagent, analysis algorithem才可以申请专利。
c*o
13 楼
Sequenom 测试的可靠性还不是特别好吧
Nat.
to
【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: Sequenom’s test, which uses DNA found in maternal blood samples to
: determine certain fetal characteristics, avoids the risk of more invasive
: tests, such as taking samples from
: the fetus or placenta. The court ruled that detecting DNA in blood falls
: under the US Supreme Court’s rule against patenting natural phenomena (Nat.
: Biotechnol. 32, 403–404, 2014). While calling the test “a positive and
: valuable contribution to science...[e]ven such valuable contributions
: can fall short of statutory patentable subject matter, as it does here.”
: Another judge wrote in a concurring opinion that though he was obligated to
: invalidate the patent claims, “[b]ut for the sweeping language in the
Nat.
to
【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: Sequenom’s test, which uses DNA found in maternal blood samples to
: determine certain fetal characteristics, avoids the risk of more invasive
: tests, such as taking samples from
: the fetus or placenta. The court ruled that detecting DNA in blood falls
: under the US Supreme Court’s rule against patenting natural phenomena (Nat.
: Biotechnol. 32, 403–404, 2014). While calling the test “a positive and
: valuable contribution to science...[e]ven such valuable contributions
: can fall short of statutory patentable subject matter, as it does here.”
: Another judge wrote in a concurring opinion that though he was obligated to
: invalidate the patent claims, “[b]ut for the sweeping language in the
相关阅读
Rao想当拿着尚方宝剑的钦差大臣一个R01一般养活几个人呀?请大家推荐病毒类杂志,偏方法的Re: 引物分析?为什么甘肃农业大学这么牛?到生物公司做疫苗开发的工作前景如何?Center for Life Sciences (PKU-THU)what's the relationshipbetween CNV and DNA methylation?which software/program should I use?急急急 检测caspase-3背景高的令人发指Dolphin或有主动思考来使用工具的能力?(代友转发,急,版主误删)聘微积分,物理和化学教师多名玩科研是种境界,年轻人一时学不来有遇到过这样的老板吗?很怕学生或postdoc成为自己竞争对手的来点有用的:NIH provocative questions on cancer高智商是显性还是隐型遗传北大落选院士挑战同行:10年后有多少能超过我问一个adenovirus的问题paper help谁能将将为啥做TB的发的文章IF偏低