That used to be true, but according to this lawyer, the USCIS started dropping your old PD if you leave without 485. HINT: the article is 3 years old, you should see the comments section under the article and the latest experience of his clients http://www.immigration.com/media/form-i-140/priority-dates-can-
. Only exceptional case such as if your earlier employer is fraud or similar scenario, USCIS may not allow to retain first priority date. 我觉得此人的说法合理 不保留PD是特例,不是规则的改变
under
【在 w****e 的大作中提到】 : That used to be true, but according to this lawyer, the USCIS started : dropping your old PD if you leave without 485. : HINT: the article is 3 years old, you should see the comments section under : the article and the latest experience of his clients : http://www.immigration.com/media/form-i-140/priority-dates-can-
【在 c*******e 的大作中提到】 : . Only exceptional case such as if your earlier employer is fraud or similar : scenario, USCIS may not allow to retain first priority date. : 我觉得此人的说法合理 : 不保留PD是特例,不是规则的改变 : : under
【在 c*******e 的大作中提到】 : . Only exceptional case such as if your earlier employer is fraud or similar : scenario, USCIS may not allow to retain first priority date. : 我觉得此人的说法合理 : 不保留PD是特例,不是规则的改变 : : under
【在 w****e 的大作中提到】 : That used to be true, but according to this lawyer, the USCIS started : dropping your old PD if you leave without 485. : HINT: the article is 3 years old, you should see the comments section under : the article and the latest experience of his clients : http://www.immigration.com/media/form-i-140/priority-dates-can-
我引用的那段话就是comments里面的,Sep 22nd 2015 下面同样是里面的comment,此人的律师和Rajiv S. Khanna 这个律师说的不一致 ak1597449 replied on Oct 30th 2015 ... . My attorney says that as per 8 C.F. R. Section 204.5(e), I can still use my earlier PD (Jan 2012). Do you guys know what does the law state and how does it apply? I have seen a few cases where it states that USCIS has now swing back to its old rule of wiping out the old PD.This makes me nervous. I checked with my attorney and they have said that even if my previous employer revokes the approved I140, I am still entitled to use the old PD. An employer withdrawing a petition is not same as it being revoked - See more at: http://www.immigration.com/media/form-i-140/priority-dates-can-be-carried-forward-even-if-old-i-140-revoked#sthash.Yll0P1Mq.dpuf
大家看这里,204.5 (e) section http://www.uscis.gov/iframe/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/ (e) Retention of section 203(b)(1) , (2) , or (3) priority date. -- A petition approved on behalf of an alien under sections 203(b)(1), (2), or ( 3) of the Act accords the alien the priority date of the approved petition for any subsequently filed petition for any classification under sections 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Act for which the alien may qualify. In the event that the alien is the beneficiary of multiple petitions under sections 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Act, the alien shall be entitled to the earliest priority date. A petition revoked under sections 204(e) or 205 of the Act will not confer a priority date, nor will any priority date be established as a result of a denied petition. A priority date is not transferable to another alien. 注意移民局revoke和公司withdraw的区别 规定还在移民局网站,明文的 所以我相信大的政策没有变,特例或者是有特殊的原因,或者就是申请资料或者移民局 的处理出错了
【在 c*******e 的大作中提到】 : 大家看这里,204.5 (e) section : http://www.uscis.gov/iframe/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/ : (e) Retention of section 203(b)(1) , (2) , or (3) priority date. -- A : petition approved on behalf of an alien under sections 203(b)(1), (2), or ( : 3) of the Act accords the alien the priority date of the approved petition : for any subsequently filed petition for any classification under sections : 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Act for which the alien may qualify. In the : event that the alien is the beneficiary of multiple petitions under sections : 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Act, the alien shall be entitled to the : earliest priority date. A petition revoked under sections 204(e) or 205
【在 c*******e 的大作中提到】 : 大家看这里,204.5 (e) section : http://www.uscis.gov/iframe/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/ : (e) Retention of section 203(b)(1) , (2) , or (3) priority date. -- A : petition approved on behalf of an alien under sections 203(b)(1), (2), or ( : 3) of the Act accords the alien the priority date of the approved petition : for any subsequently filed petition for any classification under sections : 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Act for which the alien may qualify. In the : event that the alien is the beneficiary of multiple petitions under sections : 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Act, the alien shall be entitled to the : earliest priority date. A petition revoked under sections 204(e) or 205
【在 c*******e 的大作中提到】 : 大家看这里,204.5 (e) section : http://www.uscis.gov/iframe/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/ : (e) Retention of section 203(b)(1) , (2) , or (3) priority date. -- A : petition approved on behalf of an alien under sections 203(b)(1), (2), or ( : 3) of the Act accords the alien the priority date of the approved petition : for any subsequently filed petition for any classification under sections : 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Act for which the alien may qualify. In the : event that the alien is the beneficiary of multiple petitions under sections : 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Act, the alien shall be entitled to the : earliest priority date. A petition revoked under sections 204(e) or 205
大部分律师都不太负责,刚遇到我的律师给我回信还这么说呢,还得列一大堆材料解释 为啥不行了。 There is a consistent and very clear policy about applying priority dates from previously approved I-140 petitions to new petitions. This is done regularly...
【在 t*******r 的大作中提到】 : 我们hr啥都听律师的,难搞
c*3
50 楼
这律师不错,至少递上去试试,成了就赚了,退材料也不损失什么
【在 b********e 的大作中提到】 : 大部分律师都不太负责,刚遇到我的律师给我回信还这么说呢,还得列一大堆材料解释 : 为啥不行了。 : There is a consistent and very clear policy about applying priority dates : from previously approved I-140 petitions to new petitions. This is done : regularly...