v*a
2 楼
when economists say they are doing science, physists laugh;
when physists say they are genius, mathematicians laugh.
Greed is great.
economics =/= economy
I know some Chicago economics PhDs working for government not doing
"academic" research.
like it or not, people do differentiate others based on school/subject/
money/ etc. Chicago, MIT, Harvard, Stanford, these big 4 ARE snobbish.
like it or not.
LIFE IS LIFE.
when physists say they are genius, mathematicians laugh.
Greed is great.
economics =/= economy
I know some Chicago economics PhDs working for government not doing
"academic" research.
like it or not, people do differentiate others based on school/subject/
money/ etc. Chicago, MIT, Harvard, Stanford, these big 4 ARE snobbish.
like it or not.
LIFE IS LIFE.
r*s
3 楼
No more than old cliche. Check this out:
Hedges, L. V. (1987). How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science?
American Psychologist, 42(2), 443-455.
//don't know what you mean.
These are based on the assumption that all people are after the same
things, which ignored the vast range of individual differences in terms
of preferences and life priority. Not all things are compared against
the criteria economists like.
//hehe, deep.
【在 v******a 的大作中提到】
: when economists say they are doing science, physists laugh;
: when physists say they are genius, mathematicians laugh.
: Greed is great.
: economics =/= economy
: I know some Chicago economics PhDs working for government not doing
: "academic" research.
: like it or not, people do differentiate others based on school/subject/
: money/ etc. Chicago, MIT, Harvard, Stanford, these big 4 ARE snobbish.
: like it or not.
: LIFE IS LIFE.
i*s
4 楼
HOW HARD IS HARD SCIENCE, HOW SOFT IS SOFT SCIENCE? The Empirical
Cumulativeness of Research
Larry V. Hedges (1987, American Psychologist)
People tend to think social sciences are softer science, compared to natural
science, which is more cumulative. The author first differentiates the concept
cumulativeness in the scientific field into two types. One is conceptual or
theoretical cumulativeness, which means in the broadest sense scientific
results are cumulative if empirical laws and theoretical
【在 r******s 的大作中提到】
:
: No more than old cliche. Check this out:
: Hedges, L. V. (1987). How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science?
: American Psychologist, 42(2), 443-455.
: //don't know what you mean.
: These are based on the assumption that all people are after the same
: things, which ignored the vast range of individual differences in terms
: of preferences and life priority. Not all things are compared against
: the criteria economists like.
: //hehe, deep.
Cumulativeness of Research
Larry V. Hedges (1987, American Psychologist)
People tend to think social sciences are softer science, compared to natural
science, which is more cumulative. The author first differentiates the concept
cumulativeness in the scientific field into two types. One is conceptual or
theoretical cumulativeness, which means in the broadest sense scientific
results are cumulative if empirical laws and theoretical
【在 r******s 的大作中提到】
:
: No more than old cliche. Check this out:
: Hedges, L. V. (1987). How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science?
: American Psychologist, 42(2), 443-455.
: //don't know what you mean.
: These are based on the assumption that all people are after the same
: things, which ignored the vast range of individual differences in terms
: of preferences and life priority. Not all things are compared against
: the criteria economists like.
: //hehe, deep.
i*s
5 楼
This is just a summary of the original paper, which is not available online.
The summary is from
http://www.gsia.cmu.edu/andrew/mf4f/work/rm/html/hedges.html, summitted by
Wendy Li.
concept
experimental
used
in
example,
used
sciences,
the
methods
it
【在 i***s 的大作中提到】
: HOW HARD IS HARD SCIENCE, HOW SOFT IS SOFT SCIENCE? The Empirical
: Cumulativeness of Research
: Larry V. Hedges (1987, American Psychologist)
: People tend to think social sciences are softer science, compared to natural
: science, which is more cumulative. The author first differentiates the concept
: cumulativeness in the scientific field into two types. One is conceptual or
: theoretical cumulativeness, which means in the broadest sense scientific
: results are cumulative if empirical laws and theoretical
The summary is from
http://www.gsia.cmu.edu/andrew/mf4f/work/rm/html/hedges.html, summitted by
Wendy Li.
concept
experimental
used
in
example,
used
sciences,
the
methods
it
【在 i***s 的大作中提到】
: HOW HARD IS HARD SCIENCE, HOW SOFT IS SOFT SCIENCE? The Empirical
: Cumulativeness of Research
: Larry V. Hedges (1987, American Psychologist)
: People tend to think social sciences are softer science, compared to natural
: science, which is more cumulative. The author first differentiates the concept
: cumulativeness in the scientific field into two types. One is conceptual or
: theoretical cumulativeness, which means in the broadest sense scientific
: results are cumulative if empirical laws and theoretical
相关阅读
请留美经济学人说句话银行破产的储户的存款怎么办?某些海龟博士、教授任职国内经管院校就像名妓在妓院挂牌不出台一样请教:啥是first- and second order effects?出个奥运题!陈志武:如何从国有到民有请教一下写文章全面自主创新 建立世界经济强国求 paper目前金融危机求些数据能不能通过薪酬机制来抑制过分投机随便问一个问题回国选择offer的标准--我的一些经历求助matlab金融应用的参考书 (转载)犹豫,我应该quit经济学phd吗?这几天的讨论想起了十几年张维迎玩的招数请教各位在分析方面用的什么入门好书能力不足还是别有用心——评《我们的政府有多大》zz (转载)this year's job market