"The Principal-Agent Relationship in Real Estate Brokerage Services" Real Estate Economics, Volume 20 Issue 1, Pages 89 - 106 by Michael A. Arnold Thanks so much!!!! If possible, please send the paper to my email: m*****[email protected] Let me know your mitbbs account, and I would like to appreciate you by sending you baozi! :)
【在 s***e 的大作中提到】 : "The Principal-Agent Relationship in Real Estate Brokerage Services" Real : Estate Economics, Volume 20 Issue 1, Pages 89 - 106 : by Michael A. Arnold : Thanks so much!!!! : If possible, please send the paper to my email: m*****[email protected] Let me : know your mitbbs account, and I would like to appreciate you by sending you : baozi! :)
note this RFC is not strictly speaking a NAT66, indeed the author has changed its naming to NPTv6 if you've noticed and it is also experimental. None of other nat66 or napt66 drafts has survived I think the only potential legitimate reason is as what this NPTv6 claims to solve, but don't think there is any mandatory cases..meaning you can always configure/modify/plan/enforce your network addressing scheme without using the NPTv6 solution although it provides convenience. What is a compelling reason in your case? like to learn