请问我有一条无线上网、一条有线上网，能否同时使用加快网速？# EmergingNetworking - 热门网络技术
h*g
1 楼
这里懂技术的人多，我来问问。家里有一个无线接入、一个有线接入，能否同时使用加
快下载速度呢？以前用modem的时候知道有双枪，就是两条电话线一起用。现在无线有
线能否一起用呢？在winXP里面又该如何设置呢？
快下载速度呢？以前用modem的时候知道有双枪，就是两条电话线一起用。现在无线有
线能否一起用呢？在winXP里面又该如何设置呢？
h*g
2 楼
无线、有线通过两条不同线路接入
r*g
3 楼
同时选中两个网络连接，鼠标右键bridge connections
【在 h*****g 的大作中提到】
: 这里懂技术的人多，我来问问。家里有一个无线接入、一个有线接入，能否同时使用加
: 快下载速度呢？以前用modem的时候知道有双枪，就是两条电话线一起用。现在无线有
: 线能否一起用呢？在winXP里面又该如何设置呢？
【在 h*****g 的大作中提到】
: 这里懂技术的人多，我来问问。家里有一个无线接入、一个有线接入，能否同时使用加
: 快下载速度呢？以前用modem的时候知道有双枪，就是两条电话线一起用。现在无线有
: 线能否一起用呢？在winXP里面又该如何设置呢？
s*g
4 楼
Make sure you know what you are talking about before posting ...
To answer OP's question, you may need a router that supports load-balancing,
Windows will not be able to achieve load-balancing by itself.
【在 r*******g 的大作中提到】
: 同时选中两个网络连接，鼠标右键bridge connections
To answer OP's question, you may need a router that supports load-balancing,
Windows will not be able to achieve load-balancing by itself.
【在 r*******g 的大作中提到】
: 同时选中两个网络连接，鼠标右键bridge connections
z*r
5 楼
the bottle neck is the WAN link in his situation, tho he can do very limited
outgoing load balancing by setup 2 static routes with the same metric, the
outbound traffic goes out through the same WAN link.
I assumed the op has only one high speed internet, but with a wireless
router.
balancing,
【在 s*****g 的大作中提到】
: Make sure you know what you are talking about before posting ...
: To answer OP's question, you may need a router that supports load-balancing,
: Windows will not be able to achieve load-balancing by itself.
outgoing load balancing by setup 2 static routes with the same metric, the
outbound traffic goes out through the same WAN link.
I assumed the op has only one high speed internet, but with a wireless
router.
balancing,
【在 s*****g 的大作中提到】
: Make sure you know what you are talking about before posting ...
: To answer OP's question, you may need a router that supports load-balancing,
: Windows will not be able to achieve load-balancing by itself.
p*h
6 楼
limited
imposible to be ADSL+EVDO?
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: the bottle neck is the WAN link in his situation, tho he can do very limited
: outgoing load balancing by setup 2 static routes with the same metric, the
: outbound traffic goes out through the same WAN link.
: I assumed the op has only one high speed internet, but with a wireless
: router.
:
: balancing,
z*r
7 楼
not possible, the latency of evdo will kill the adsl is it's per-packet load
balancing
【在 p******h 的大作中提到】
:
: limited
: imposible to be ADSL+EVDO?
balancing
【在 p******h 的大作中提到】
:
: limited
: imposible to be ADSL+EVDO?
s*g
8 楼
No need to be per-packet load balancing and it is undesirable. Depends how
the router does the hash, per flow load-balancing would achieve higher
throughput if multitasking -- which is very common.
OP just needs a small router which has three interfaces, one to PC, the
other two will get (DHCP) IP addresses from two ISPs, then configure two
static routes on the router with nexthop pointing to ISP's gateway.
load
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: not possible, the latency of evdo will kill the adsl is it's per-packet load
: balancing
the router does the hash, per flow load-balancing would achieve higher
throughput if multitasking -- which is very common.
OP just needs a small router which has three interfaces, one to PC, the
other two will get (DHCP) IP addresses from two ISPs, then configure two
static routes on the router with nexthop pointing to ISP's gateway.
load
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: not possible, the latency of evdo will kill the adsl is it's per-packet load
: balancing
z*r
9 楼
you think he has 2 internet connectivities? I understand per flow or per
destina
tion works better than per packet in a lot of situations, especially for
time se
nsitive applications, but this isn't the point here. he does NOT have 2 ISPs
whi
ch I believe so.
【在 s*****g 的大作中提到】
: No need to be per-packet load balancing and it is undesirable. Depends how
: the router does the hash, per flow load-balancing would achieve higher
: throughput if multitasking -- which is very common.
: OP just needs a small router which has three interfaces, one to PC, the
: other two will get (DHCP) IP addresses from two ISPs, then configure two
: static routes on the router with nexthop pointing to ISP's gateway.
:
: load
destina
tion works better than per packet in a lot of situations, especially for
time se
nsitive applications, but this isn't the point here. he does NOT have 2 ISPs
whi
ch I believe so.
【在 s*****g 的大作中提到】
: No need to be per-packet load balancing and it is undesirable. Depends how
: the router does the hash, per flow load-balancing would achieve higher
: throughput if multitasking -- which is very common.
: OP just needs a small router which has three interfaces, one to PC, the
: other two will get (DHCP) IP addresses from two ISPs, then configure two
: static routes on the router with nexthop pointing to ISP's gateway.
:
: load
s*g
10 楼
OP explicitily said that he/she has two Internet connections, one wireless
and one wireline. Why not?! I can get two if I need to.
Anyway, I don't think this is how ISP allocate IP addresses, since traffic will be carried over PPPoE, what address mask OP get does not really matter, the 7 (or 5) IPs OP get will not be effectively in a Ethernet LAN environment, traffic between those IPs will be bridged/routes to ISP IP gateway. Make sense?
ISPs
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: you think he has 2 internet connectivities? I understand per flow or per
: destina
: tion works better than per packet in a lot of situations, especially for
: time se
: nsitive applications, but this isn't the point here. he does NOT have 2 ISPs
: whi
: ch I believe so.
and one wireline. Why not?! I can get two if I need to.
Anyway, I don't think this is how ISP allocate IP addresses, since traffic will be carried over PPPoE, what address mask OP get does not really matter, the 7 (or 5) IPs OP get will not be effectively in a Ethernet LAN environment, traffic between those IPs will be bridged/routes to ISP IP gateway. Make sense?
ISPs
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: you think he has 2 internet connectivities? I understand per flow or per
: destina
: tion works better than per packet in a lot of situations, especially for
: time se
: nsitive applications, but this isn't the point here. he does NOT have 2 ISPs
: whi
: ch I believe so.
z*r
11 楼
heihei, do you believe the op doesn't know what he was talking about? if
that statement is from a professional network engineer, I read it as it
appears. otherwise, I would read it from his point of view.
as I said in the first reply, the situation is most likely like this, the op
has a laptop, which has a wifi interface and a wired interface, and his
router is a consumer level wireless router, say linksys, that laptop can
certainly get 2 IPs from this single wireless router. THIS makes the op
t
【在 s*****g 的大作中提到】
: OP explicitily said that he/she has two Internet connections, one wireless
: and one wireline. Why not?! I can get two if I need to.
: Anyway, I don't think this is how ISP allocate IP addresses, since traffic will be carried over PPPoE, what address mask OP get does not really matter, the 7 (or 5) IPs OP get will not be effectively in a Ethernet LAN environment, traffic between those IPs will be bridged/routes to ISP IP gateway. Make sense?
:
: ISPs
that statement is from a professional network engineer, I read it as it
appears. otherwise, I would read it from his point of view.
as I said in the first reply, the situation is most likely like this, the op
has a laptop, which has a wifi interface and a wired interface, and his
router is a consumer level wireless router, say linksys, that laptop can
certainly get 2 IPs from this single wireless router. THIS makes the op
t
【在 s*****g 的大作中提到】
: OP explicitily said that he/she has two Internet connections, one wireless
: and one wireline. Why not?! I can get two if I need to.
: Anyway, I don't think this is how ISP allocate IP addresses, since traffic will be carried over PPPoE, what address mask OP get does not really matter, the 7 (or 5) IPs OP get will not be effectively in a Ethernet LAN environment, traffic between those IPs will be bridged/routes to ISP IP gateway. Make sense?
:
: ISPs
H*y
12 楼
Consider the following situation. A person has his/her own home internet
connection (wired), and can also get access to a wireless router in a
neighboring apartment. He/she would like to take the adavantage of the
additional wireless connection, but WindowsXP routes all the traffic via the
wired interface only.
Believe it or not, I was asked the question mentioned above by a friend who
does not have much knowledge about networking.
op
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: heihei, do you believe the op doesn't know what he was talking about? if
: that statement is from a professional network engineer, I read it as it
: appears. otherwise, I would read it from his point of view.
: as I said in the first reply, the situation is most likely like this, the op
: has a laptop, which has a wifi interface and a wired interface, and his
: router is a consumer level wireless router, say linksys, that laptop can
: certainly get 2 IPs from this single wireless router. THIS makes the op
: t
connection (wired), and can also get access to a wireless router in a
neighboring apartment. He/she would like to take the adavantage of the
additional wireless connection, but WindowsXP routes all the traffic via the
wired interface only.
Believe it or not, I was asked the question mentioned above by a friend who
does not have much knowledge about networking.
op
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: heihei, do you believe the op doesn't know what he was talking about? if
: that statement is from a professional network engineer, I read it as it
: appears. otherwise, I would read it from his point of view.
: as I said in the first reply, the situation is most likely like this, the op
: has a laptop, which has a wifi interface and a wired interface, and his
: router is a consumer level wireless router, say linksys, that laptop can
: certainly get 2 IPs from this single wireless router. THIS makes the op
: t
z*r
13 楼
the reason for the windows machine to pick up the wired interface as the
default is that the wireless route metric is higher than the wiredroute. do
a "route print" on the windows machine, you can see that you have 2 default
gateways, one is the wired with metric of 1, and the another is the wireless
with metric of 5. you can change the wireless metric to 1, then you will
have 2 ECMP routes.
I am not sure how windows OS handles ECMP routes, do me a favor, capture the
packets and post the results
【在 H***y 的大作中提到】
: Consider the following situation. A person has his/her own home internet
: connection (wired), and can also get access to a wireless router in a
: neighboring apartment. He/she would like to take the adavantage of the
: additional wireless connection, but WindowsXP routes all the traffic via the
: wired interface only.
: Believe it or not, I was asked the question mentioned above by a friend who
: does not have much knowledge about networking.
:
: op
default is that the wireless route metric is higher than the wiredroute. do
a "route print" on the windows machine, you can see that you have 2 default
gateways, one is the wired with metric of 1, and the another is the wireless
with metric of 5. you can change the wireless metric to 1, then you will
have 2 ECMP routes.
I am not sure how windows OS handles ECMP routes, do me a favor, capture the
packets and post the results
【在 H***y 的大作中提到】
: Consider the following situation. A person has his/her own home internet
: connection (wired), and can also get access to a wireless router in a
: neighboring apartment. He/she would like to take the adavantage of the
: additional wireless connection, but WindowsXP routes all the traffic via the
: wired interface only.
: Believe it or not, I was asked the question mentioned above by a friend who
: does not have much knowledge about networking.
:
: op
L*t
14 楼
If doable, per-destination load balancing is the only way to go. Because
most download are TCP-based. Multiple routes per TCP connection will cause
out-of-order delivery. TCP by nature will treat any out-of-order packet as a
result of congestion, thus triggering slow-start procedure, which will
impact the throughput severely.
do
default
wireless
the
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: the reason for the windows machine to pick up the wired interface as the
: default is that the wireless route metric is higher than the wiredroute. do
: a "route print" on the windows machine, you can see that you have 2 default
: gateways, one is the wired with metric of 1, and the another is the wireless
: with metric of 5. you can change the wireless metric to 1, then you will
: have 2 ECMP routes.
: I am not sure how windows OS handles ECMP routes, do me a favor, capture the
: packets and post the results
most download are TCP-based. Multiple routes per TCP connection will cause
out-of-order delivery. TCP by nature will treat any out-of-order packet as a
result of congestion, thus triggering slow-start procedure, which will
impact the throughput severely.
do
default
wireless
the
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: the reason for the windows machine to pick up the wired interface as the
: default is that the wireless route metric is higher than the wiredroute. do
: a "route print" on the windows machine, you can see that you have 2 default
: gateways, one is the wired with metric of 1, and the another is the wireless
: with metric of 5. you can change the wireless metric to 1, then you will
: have 2 ECMP routes.
: I am not sure how windows OS handles ECMP routes, do me a favor, capture the
: packets and post the results
j*r
15 楼
Agree, but it is not the performance issue. It won't work at all if
it's not per-destination based, the different source IP from different
ISP will break the TCP session immediately. Also the SOHO stateful
firewall will block it too.
a
【在 L******t 的大作中提到】
: If doable, per-destination load balancing is the only way to go. Because
: most download are TCP-based. Multiple routes per TCP connection will cause
: out-of-order delivery. TCP by nature will treat any out-of-order packet as a
: result of congestion, thus triggering slow-start procedure, which will
: impact the throughput severely.
:
: do
: default
: wireless
: the
it's not per-destination based, the different source IP from different
ISP will break the TCP session immediately. Also the SOHO stateful
firewall will block it too.
a
【在 L******t 的大作中提到】
: If doable, per-destination load balancing is the only way to go. Because
: most download are TCP-based. Multiple routes per TCP connection will cause
: out-of-order delivery. TCP by nature will treat any out-of-order packet as a
: result of congestion, thus triggering slow-start procedure, which will
: impact the throughput severely.
:
: do
: default
: wireless
: the
u*s
16 楼
其实这个不难。我假设你有broadband和evdo同时接入你的电脑。你的电脑会有两个
default gateway。windows可以更具每个defaultgateway的metric value决定最佳路线。
通常而言，sprint evdo用的是32-bit的host route，没有default gateway，所以它的
metric是direct connect，而broadband connection的default gateway是1 hop away
，所以metric 比较高。window 会default使用evdo connection。如果要load balance
，你必须要将两个default gateway的metric 设置为同样的value。
default gateway。windows可以更具每个defaultgateway的metric value决定最佳路线。
通常而言，sprint evdo用的是32-bit的host route，没有default gateway，所以它的
metric是direct connect，而broadband connection的default gateway是1 hop away
，所以metric 比较高。window 会default使用evdo connection。如果要load balance
，你必须要将两个default gateway的metric 设置为同样的value。
相关阅读
有玩儿machinima的么？win 98 network setupanybody tried skype 2.0betareactivity has XML accelerator100!!!!!!!!!!!Anybody uses Skype on PocketPC?Who is CCIE here?推荐一个小东西，很实用看看百度的广告什么是web 2.0啊？VPLS marking issue?what software can ...Nortel这个败家子儿又要折腾Tasman了？Juniper Sues LR Message BoardersThe 10 Biggest Microsoft Surprises of 2005 Application acceleration is food for thought中文域名有人熟悉3p吗？802.11e wi-fi QoS standard approved?2nd