Re: 自二战以来，真正恐怖的bug战争模式，只有美帝一家 (转载) - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Joke - 肚皮舞运动

Re: 自二战以来，真正恐怖的bug战争模式，只有美帝一家 (转载)

Re: 自二战以来，真正恐怖的bug战争模式，只有美帝一家 (转载)# Joke - 肚皮舞运动

g*n2015-07-21 07:07

1 楼

MILEAGE IS UNLIMITED WHEN VEHICLE REMAINS IN MI, OH, IL IN, WV, KY, PA, WI,
TN, MN, IA, MO, NJ, NC, VA, MD, DE, NY, CT, RI, MA, NH, VT AND ONTARIO,
CANADA. IF TRAVELING OUTSIDE OF THESE STATES, MILEAGE IS CHARGED AT 150 FREE
PER DAY, 1050 FREE PER WEEK AND 3000 FREE PER MONTH. ADDITIONAL MILEAGE IS
AT .25 PER MILE.
他怎么知道我有没有出这些地方？

G*n2015-07-21 07:07

2 楼

【以下文字转载自 Military2 讨论区】
发信人: wulimin1234 (一生), 信区: Military2
标题: Re: 自二战以来，真正恐怖的bug战争模式，只有美帝一家
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jul 21 03:00:59 2015, 美东)
你才真是太naive了。美军的航母是干嘛用的？B1 B2 B52轰炸完之后，直接飞回人家航
母上不就得了？还非得弄个地面机场才行？美军之所以威慑力大，就是因为几大航母战
斗群啊！

k*i2015-07-21 07:07

3 楼

他不知祷所以没事

,
FREE
IS

【在 g*****n 的大作中提到】

: MILEAGE IS UNLIMITED WHEN VEHICLE REMAINS IN MI, OH, IL IN, WV, KY, PA, WI,
: TN, MN, IA, MO, NJ, NC, VA, MD, DE, NY, CT, RI, MA, NH, VT AND ONTARIO,
: CANADA. IF TRAVELING OUTSIDE OF THESE STATES, MILEAGE IS CHARGED AT 150 FREE
: PER DAY, 1050 FREE PER WEEK AND 3000 FREE PER MONTH. ADDITIONAL MILEAGE IS
: AT .25 PER MILE.
: 他怎么知道我有没有出这些地方？

H*g2015-07-21 07:07

4 楼

http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=49189
Comment: True story...bet the bad guy's satellites went berserk looking at
this one...! (And it wasn't the Navy paying off a bet against AF!)
While this may look like a gag shot, it is actually a "transport of a
transport" necessity. The B-52 was in Beirut, Lebanon undergoing routine
fuel tank cleaning. Workmen accidently damaged the bladder system and had to
install the bladders from smaller C-130s temporarily. The plane was flown
to nearby McCollough air base where it was lifted upon a barge bound for
Tyre on the Mediterranean. Once there it was off-loaded onto the carrier
deck for transport to Crete where the appropriate tank bladders were
installed. It was then flown back to Beirut. Military cooperation in action.

y*72015-07-21 07:07

5 楼

几年前，我取车的时候问过enterprise的小二，他说enterprise不知道车去过那里。不
过有几种情况他们会按照开出计算：罚单，车祸，过路费等。
不知道近几年是否有改进。

H*g2015-07-21 07:07

6 楼

Awesome but fake. Someone on another board found the original photo

i*t2015-07-21 07:07

7 楼

你要是出事故了就惨了
保险公司不理你
因为你违反了agreement
visa card也不会给你保

,
FREE
IS

【在 g*****n 的大作中提到】

H*g2015-07-21 07:07

8 楼

Despite the fact that Troodon found the original pic, it is easily debunked
by comparing known measurements of a B-52 and the USS Nimitz [CVN 68]. The B
-52 is placed right on the beam of the Nimitz and spans the entire flight
deck. The wingspan of a B-52 is 185 ft. The beam of the Nimitz is 252 ft. If
done to actual scale, the B-52's wingspan would only cover about 75% of the
width of the deck.

g*n2015-07-21 07:07

9 楼

我违反啥agreement了？

【在 i******t 的大作中提到】

: 你要是出事故了就惨了
: 保险公司不理你
: 因为你违反了agreement
: visa card也不会给你保
:
: ,
: FREE
: IS

H*g2015-07-21 07:07

10 楼

For comparison here is some data on the largest plane ever to actually take
off and land on an Aircraft Carrier.
In November 1963 as part of a test study as to the feasibility of large
scale Carrier On Board Delivery using large cargo planes, a C-130 cargo
plane made a series of test landing and take offs onboard the USS Forrestal.
The USS Forrestal is only slightly smaller then the USS Nimitz shown in the
photo (238 foot maximum beam vice 252 feet). As comparison a B-52 has a
wingspan of 185 feet while the C-130 has a wingspan of 133 feet.

i*t2015-07-21 07:07

11 楼

你不听徒弟孙悟空的话，随便跑出他在地上画的圈子，碰到妖怪就只好自己负责了

H*g2015-07-21 07:07

12 楼

Obviously fake; the X-Wing model J didn't appear until 1943. The strut
dividing the cockpit side window is a dead giveaway. A very few X-Wings did
see combat in the Pacific, but in 1943, most of them were in action over
Italy. It's little details like that which keep us on our toes!