【在 a****g 的大作中提到】 : PRICE FORECAST1 PERCENT1 FORECAST2 PERCENT2 : are forecast1 and forecast2 the suggested changed? : and is price the projected price? : Thanks.
............... Forecast1 and Forecast2 were the downside estimate. i.e. the amount of price correction to expect. Of course, it has now dropped far more than that Forecast1 now suggests that it is half way to being oversold or bottom, and Forecast2 says not even in positive reading, i.e. still bearish. To night will probably see Forecast2 turning positive. Ideally, you want $5 or more for Forecast1 and $6 or more for Forecast2 to be a short-term bottom and we are not there yet, as of last night.
【在 a****g 的大作中提到】 : PRICE FORECAST1 PERCENT1 FORECAST2 PERCENT2 : are forecast1 and forecast2 the suggested changed? : and is price the projected price? : Thanks.
n*u
25 楼
很有可能
【在 l********i 的大作中提到】 : 估计老中一看到是老中寄过来的,怕怕吧
l*t
26 楼
OE tomorrow?
【在 k***n 的大作中提到】 : OE tomorrow : those 1800 calls became worthless overnight
z*u
27 楼
agree! what's wrong with us. really want to black chinese buyers, but technically impossible
if you really want to make your prediction meaningful, analyze your own forecast result first and then make a more useful information from there.. otherwise, it make little sense to list thousands of preditions everyday you could simply make it easier to read like a rating for bullish or bearish if your two set of predictions are for different frequency trading, you could still market short time and long time rating. check out the ugly designed stockta.com site, I think the way they present their reading of every stock is much better than yours.
bearish ..................................... Adding support and resistance is easy for us, but I do not see how that will actually be better. Since we already give the magnitude of movement as Forecast1 and Forecast2 (meaningful only at price extremes), the targets are easily derived, and that in turn translates into support and resistance. But let me see what my colleagues think. It is much better to know where price is going and by how much, than to just give support & resistance levels, in my opinion. Adding more columns may create too much width for easy display. I think there is a fundamental difference in the way people think about stock price behavior that may account for the inability to understand, as there are others who readily understand without explanation. So minds do work very differently.
【在 c****i 的大作中提到】 : if you really want to make your prediction meaningful, : analyze your own forecast result first and then make a more useful : information from there.. : otherwise, it make little sense to list thousands of preditions everyday : you could simply make it easier to read like a rating for bullish or bearish : if your two set of predictions are for different frequency trading, you : could still market short time and long time rating. : check out the ugly designed stockta.com site, I think the way they present : their reading of every stock is much better than yours.
别动不动就拿中国说事,好像中国离开了你的预测就玩不转了,其实中国缺什么样的人 ,就不缺你这样的人。 所有的预测系统都有一个 DISCLAIMER: Profits are not guaranteed. Any and all liabilities are disclaimed. Forecasts are for your information only and are not specific advice or recommendations. 你知道为啥吗?因为都觉得自己不靠谱,怕打官司,您那么牛B的系统,我觉得根本不 用留这条后路啊,不让中国的前途靠你不是等于扯蛋吗?你最后来一句不guarantee, 全泡汤了,是不?
【在 n***r 的大作中提到】 : 别动不动就拿中国说事,好像中国离开了你的预测就玩不转了,其实中国缺什么样的人 : ,就不缺你这样的人。 : 所有的预测系统都有一个 DISCLAIMER: : Profits are not guaranteed. Any and all liabilities are disclaimed. : Forecasts are for your information only and are not specific advice : or recommendations. : 你知道为啥吗?因为都觉得自己不靠谱,怕打官司,您那么牛B的系统,我觉得根本不 : 用留这条后路啊,不让中国的前途靠你不是等于扯蛋吗?你最后来一句不guarantee, : 全泡汤了,是不?