http://cenblog.org/the-editors-blog/2010/10/it%E2%80%99s-not-the-money-stupid/ It's Not The Money, Stupid! This guest editorial is by Allen J. Bard, a chemistry professor and director of the Center for Electrochemistry at the University of Texas, Austin. The culture of academic research has shifted over the past 50 years from research evaluation based on teaching, creativity, and productivity to one based simply on the amount of money (often now called “resources”) raised. A number of factors have played a role in this change: the “business model ” for universities, an increased willingness to accept greed as a virtue in our society and as a measure of success, and a desire for an easy “ objective” measure of something that is otherwise difficult to quantify. As a result, we have reached the point where faculty members are judged more by the amount of research funds they have raised, primarily from government agencies, than by the accomplishments that flow from the funding. Obtaining high levels of funding is considered not only desirable, but absolutely necessary, and I’ve been party to tenure discussions that have centered on this (for example, on the need for “scoring two major grants”) rather than on the quality of work. It is possible to rationalize this attitude by saying that funds raised are a measure of how one is evaluated by one’s peers. The fact is, however, that the final decision to fund really comes from project officers who have often become remote from the frontiers of research and often fall prey to the fad of the month. It is also true that the best grant-swingers are those who are willing shamelessly to hype their research and their field—truth and modesty be damned. The result of this cultural shift, as we have heard over and over from colleagues, is that one spends 70% of one’s working time writing proposals and seeking funding. Thus, not only do we operate under a model where highly trained scientists are almost immediately removed from direct hands-on research upon arriving at a faculty position, but now are also largely removed even from close research supervision of students. As the system develops, the probability of being funded on any given project gets smaller and smaller, so one must keep writing and sending in proposals that have to be processed and evaluated by a growing number of project officers, but, alas, by a fixed number of peers. The agencies, forever seeking more funding from the government, also keep inventing an alphabet soup of new programs. These come with an increasing bureaucratic burden of accepting the funds, thus guaranteeing an ever-increasing time commitment by investigators. A more recent and potentially even more damaging trend is a growing expectation by universities that faculty should help fund operations not only through overhead from research grants, but also through the generation of intellectual property (IP). Faculty is heavily encouraged to generate patents and find partners to license them, or, even better, to nucleate new start-up companies. To advance this agenda, universities are hiring highly paid administrators—with visions of Warfarin and Gatorade dancing in their heads—to head technology commercialization efforts. These are intended not only to generate additional funds for the university, but also to demonstrate to the public the “economic value” of the university to society. These kinds of activities have even been described as “critical to the mission of a university.” While such considerations have not yet become a major influence on promotion and tenure decisions, one has reason to fear for the future. No wonder we have problems with attracting good young people to careers in academic science despite large outreach efforts. If working closely with students and doing long-term fundamental research is not the goal and money is the important thing, there are more lucrative professions than academic ones for them to pursue. I also fear that the perceived importance of money in science has led to a public backlash on issues like climate change and chemical toxicity, with the feeling that scientists are pushing these areas to get funding and not necessarily because they believe all that they report . This indeed is tragic.
this editorial is exactly what I just said this morning. 搞一般文章容易,但搞有影响的好文章还是难的。 钱这种东西,能维持一个组正常运作就好了, 最终衡量一个人的价值还是他/她能够给科学带来什么有价值的东西。 只是现在人们不想那么远。 但是应该多想想at the end of the day.... 以前学生都觉得跟ap至少还可以有很多机会受到手把手指导, 另外一个好处是发文章比较快, 但在现在这个大环境下, ap们都得花大把的时间去搞钱, 文章相对来说现在是不太重要的一面了, 好几个例子都是过去五年10篇文章, 甚至不管是否通讯/第一,是否本组出品,是研究论文还是综述。 学生选择ap做老板,如今可能只剩下“方向比较新”这一个好处了。
director raised. model in
【在 w********h 的大作中提到】 : http://cenblog.org/the-editors-blog/2010/10/it%E2%80%99s-not-the-money-stupid/ : It's Not The Money, Stupid! : This guest editorial is by Allen J. Bard, a chemistry professor and director : of the Center for Electrochemistry at the University of Texas, Austin. : The culture of academic research has shifted over the past 50 years from : research evaluation based on teaching, creativity, and productivity to one : based simply on the amount of money (often now called “resources”) raised. : A number of factors have played a role in this change: the “business model : ” for universities, an increased willingness to accept greed as a virtue in : our society and as a measure of success, and a desire for an easy “
【在 w********h 的大作中提到】 : this editorial is exactly what I just said this morning. : 搞一般文章容易,但搞有影响的好文章还是难的。 : 钱这种东西,能维持一个组正常运作就好了, : 最终衡量一个人的价值还是他/她能够给科学带来什么有价值的东西。 : 只是现在人们不想那么远。 : 但是应该多想想at the end of the day.... : 以前学生都觉得跟ap至少还可以有很多机会受到手把手指导, : 另外一个好处是发文章比较快, : 但在现在这个大环境下, : ap们都得花大把的时间去搞钱,
【在 w********h 的大作中提到】 : http://cenblog.org/the-editors-blog/2010/10/it%E2%80%99s-not-the-money-stupid/ : It's Not The Money, Stupid! : This guest editorial is by Allen J. Bard, a chemistry professor and director : of the Center for Electrochemistry at the University of Texas, Austin. : The culture of academic research has shifted over the past 50 years from : research evaluation based on teaching, creativity, and productivity to one : based simply on the amount of money (often now called “resources”) raised. : A number of factors have played a role in this change: the “business model : ” for universities, an increased willingness to accept greed as a virtue in : our society and as a measure of success, and a desire for an easy “
【在 w********h 的大作中提到】 : http://cenblog.org/the-editors-blog/2010/10/it%E2%80%99s-not-the-money-stupid/ : It's Not The Money, Stupid! : This guest editorial is by Allen J. Bard, a chemistry professor and director : of the Center for Electrochemistry at the University of Texas, Austin. : The culture of academic research has shifted over the past 50 years from : research evaluation based on teaching, creativity, and productivity to one : based simply on the amount of money (often now called “resources”) raised. : A number of factors have played a role in this change: the “business model : ” for universities, an increased willingness to accept greed as a virtue in : our society and as a measure of success, and a desire for an easy “
Maybe this is the law. At some point a country or organization will go down and reorganize itself and become strong again. It is also possible it will die out.