工作AA对亚裔有利# Parenting - 为人父母
a*1
1 楼
现在6%的亚裔已经占了20%的名校入学名额，这方面的斗争成果已经很不错了，没必要
再纠缠下去；真正对亚裔不利的是工作场所的竞争，比如硅谷1/3是亚裔，但只有6%的
董事会成员是亚裔，这才是需要AA的。亚裔占全美5%（2011年，现在6%），只有0.3%的
公司领导、不到1%的公司董事会成员是亚裔，这些才真正需要AA的。不要说什么merit
based，湖南人提拔湖南人，白人提拔白人，印度人提拔印度人，大家都是在职场上混
的，中国美国都一样，相信没有人这么幼稚相信什么公司提拔看业绩看表现的鬼话。如
果把AA落实到升职中，对华人只好不坏。
再说一遍：我不讨论AA是对还是错，按种族配额是种族主义也好、不公平不正义也好，
我不在乎；我只在乎提高亚裔在公司管理层的比例，如果按种族配额可以提高，我就支
持AA。显然，现在1/3的人口不按AA只有6%，如果按AA有可能提高到30%，10%也好啦。
And yet the numbers tell a different story. According to a recent study,
Asian-Americans represent roughly 5 percent of the population but only
0.3 percent of corporate officers, less than 1 percent of corporate board
members, and around 2 percent of college presidents. There are nine Asian-
American CEOs in the Fortune 500. In specific fields where Asian-Americans
are heavily represented, there is a similar asymmetry. A third of all
software engineers in Silicon Valley are Asian, and yet they make up only 6
percent of board members and about 10 percent of corporate officers of the
Bay Area’s 25 largest companies. At the National Institutes of Health,
where 21.5 percent of tenure-track scientists are Asians, only 4.7 percent
of the lab or branch directors are, according to a study conducted in 2005.
One succinct evocation of the situation appeared in the comments section of
a website called Yellowworld: “If you’re East Asian, you need to attend a
top-tier university to land a good high-paying gig. Even if you land that
good high-paying gig, the white guy with the pedigree from a mediocre state
university will somehow move ahead of you in the ranks simply because he’
swhite.”
http://nymag.com/news/features/asian-americans-2011-5/index3.ht
再纠缠下去；真正对亚裔不利的是工作场所的竞争，比如硅谷1/3是亚裔，但只有6%的
董事会成员是亚裔，这才是需要AA的。亚裔占全美5%（2011年，现在6%），只有0.3%的
公司领导、不到1%的公司董事会成员是亚裔，这些才真正需要AA的。不要说什么merit
based，湖南人提拔湖南人，白人提拔白人，印度人提拔印度人，大家都是在职场上混
的，中国美国都一样，相信没有人这么幼稚相信什么公司提拔看业绩看表现的鬼话。如
果把AA落实到升职中，对华人只好不坏。
再说一遍：我不讨论AA是对还是错，按种族配额是种族主义也好、不公平不正义也好，
我不在乎；我只在乎提高亚裔在公司管理层的比例，如果按种族配额可以提高，我就支
持AA。显然，现在1/3的人口不按AA只有6%，如果按AA有可能提高到30%，10%也好啦。
And yet the numbers tell a different story. According to a recent study,
Asian-Americans represent roughly 5 percent of the population but only
0.3 percent of corporate officers, less than 1 percent of corporate board
members, and around 2 percent of college presidents. There are nine Asian-
American CEOs in the Fortune 500. In specific fields where Asian-Americans
are heavily represented, there is a similar asymmetry. A third of all
software engineers in Silicon Valley are Asian, and yet they make up only 6
percent of board members and about 10 percent of corporate officers of the
Bay Area’s 25 largest companies. At the National Institutes of Health,
where 21.5 percent of tenure-track scientists are Asians, only 4.7 percent
of the lab or branch directors are, according to a study conducted in 2005.
One succinct evocation of the situation appeared in the comments section of
a website called Yellowworld: “If you’re East Asian, you need to attend a
top-tier university to land a good high-paying gig. Even if you land that
good high-paying gig, the white guy with the pedigree from a mediocre state
university will somehow move ahead of you in the ranks simply because he’
swhite.”
http://nymag.com/news/features/asian-americans-2011-5/index3.ht