Redian新闻
>
致莱德市全体市民的公开信

致莱德市全体市民的公开信

公众号新闻

莱德市全体市民:
今日澳洲2023年7月19日报道,为庆祝悉尼西北Eastwood区“韩国城”项目的正式启动,上周在一间韩国酒吧举办庆典活动。记者早先得知,“韩国城”命名一事曾在当地社区引发争议。有华人居民称感到不公,批判此举为“偷窃”;也有西人居民表示,有分裂社区之嫌,恐“影响族裔团结”。项目动议发起人之一以及“韩国城” 项目工作组主席、韩裔议员Daniel Han接受了今日澳洲App记者的采访,就此前社区中出现的反对之声做出回应。他说,“我不认为这是分裂社区,‘韩国城’带来的利好会像 ‘泡沫’一样蔓延整个社区。” 。
针对这一局势,澳大利亚华人总工会执委会近期召集法律,会计以及城市规划等有关方面的专业人士组成城市发展组开会讨论有关情况,得出有关专业意见,现在公开发布如下:
1. 城市规划和设计:这种类型的项目可能需要遵循具有法律约束力的规划法规。如果” 韩国城” 的设立对周边的基础设施,如道路、公共设施或整个社区结构产生影响,可能需要符合某些城市规划流程。在这样的流程中,公众的反馈和评审可能是必要的。目前DA的审批权已经由city council转移到第三方的planning panel, 同样的, city council是否有审批social planning的权限。
2. 平等权利和反歧视法规:如果” 韩国城” 的设立对华人社区或其他种族社区产生不公平的影响,可能会涉及平等权利和反歧视法的问题,反歧视法阻止在公共生活的许多方面基于种族、国籍或民族而进行的歧视。而且该项目有可能把韩裔社区与主流社区以及其他民族社区隔离的隐患,对韩裔社区的发展有可能存在不利影响。
3. 商业法规:如果” 韩国城” 的设立对商业运营产生了影响,比如改变了某些商业法规或许可证的状态,可能需要在商业法律方面进行深入探讨。
4. 公众参与和透明度:在大多数民主社区中,公众对于大型项目的决策有着发言权。如果政府没有提供适当的公众咨询和政治协商,或者决策过程不够透明,可能会引发法律问题。
5.合规的执行团队:“韩国城” 项目工作组主席和副主席都是韩裔议员,在项目的实施过程中存在行政失当的隐患。
6. 程序正义:“韩国城” 项目也许是一个不坏的方案,我们并不明确反对,但是在审批过程中缺乏必须的正当的程序。同时,我们也没有在媒体报道中看到韩国社区在Eastwood持续举办过韩国社区的大型民族社区活动,我们看到的是一年一度的青苹果节,一个民族社区的称呼都是历史的积淀自然形成的,“韩国城” 项目让人感觉到是两个韩国市议员人为催生的。
7.非本地韩裔文化展示:“韩国城” 地标牌上方为牌坊形状,辅以英韩双语标注。此外,垃圾桶上也出现韩国国花木槿花图案和韩文介绍。既然是澳大利亚的领土,为什么要有其他国家的国花图案?
8.漠视民意以及行政失当:Ryde city council明知道 “韩国城” 项目存在争议却没有暂停施工,并开展广泛的听证会和政治协商,是否存在行政失当?
9.不可逆转的影响:Eastwood“韩国城”的命名势必会对有关商业投资,人口流动,教育,就业以及房地产的价格等一系列走向产生不可逆转的影响,在项目批准之前,有关方面是否做了相应的评估报告并公之于众?
针对这一情况,澳大利亚华人总工会城市发展组决定发起莱德市城市发展论坛,邀请包括韩裔社区组织在内的各方面的社区以及专业人士及组织参加,就“韩国城” 项目以及其他有关城市发展项目进行讨论并采取相应行动:
  1. 申请法院禁止令,要求暂缓“韩国城” 项目的施工。
  2. 要求Ryde council以及州政府举行听证会和政治协商会。
  3. 要求州政府和联邦政府任命独立调查委员会做相关调查。
  4. 组建包括律师,会计师,城市规划师,民俗专家等专业人士的专业团队,组织编制有关评估报告并提交有关方面。
  5. 一切有必要的法律和社区行动。
我们诚挚邀请所有市民参加我们的正义行动!

联合秘书处
[email protected]
An open letter to all citizens of Ryde City
Dear Citizens of Ryde City,
On July 19, 2023, Australia Today reported the official launch celebration of the "Korea Town" project in Eastwood, Northwest Sydney. The event took place at a Korean bar last week. However, the naming of "Korea Town" has sparked controversy within our local community. Some Chinese residents feel it is unfair and criticize it as "stealing," while some Western residents are concerned about potential community division and its impact on ethnic unity. Daniel Han, a Korean Australian and one of the initiators of the project, who is also the chairman of the "Korea Town" project working group and a Ryde City Councilor, responded to the opposition by stating that he believes the project will not divide the community and that its benefits will spread like a "bubble" encompassing the entire community.
In response to this situation, the executive committee of the Australian Chinese Workers Association recently gathered professionals in legal, accounting, and urban planning to form an urban development panel. The purpose was to discuss the situation and provide relevant professional opinions, which are now publicly released as follows:
  1. Urban planning and design: Projects of this nature may be subject to legally binding planning regulations. If the creation of a "Koreatown" impacts surrounding infrastructure, such as roads, public facilities, or the overall community structure, specific urban planning processes may be required. During this process, public feedback and review may be necessary. Currently, the approval right of DA (Development Application) has been transferred from the city council to a third-party planning panel. Similarly, the authority of the city council to approve social planning needs further clarification.
  2. Equal rights and anti-discrimination statutes: The establishment of "Koreatown" could potentially adversely affect Chinese or other ethnic communities, raising concerns about equal rights and anti-discrimination laws that prohibit racial, national, or ethnic discrimination in various aspects of public life. Moreover, the project might lead to isolation of the Korean community from the mainstream and other ethnic communities, possibly impacting the development of the Korean community.
  3. Business Regulations: The establishment of "Koreatown" may have implications on business operations, such as changes in certain business regulations or permits, which would necessitate further exploration within the realm of business laws.
  4. Public Participation and Transparency: In most democratic communities, the public plays a crucial role in decisions concerning large projects. Legal issues may arise if the government fails to provide adequate public consultation, political negotiation, and transparent decision-making processes.
  5. Compliance executive team: Given that the chairman and vice-chairman of the "Korea Town" project working group are both Korean, there may be hidden risks of improper administration during the project's implementation.
  6. Lack of Proper Procedures: While the "Korea Town" project may not be inherently flawed, we do not expressly oppose it. However, we have not observed continuous large-scale ethnic community activities by the Korean community in Eastwood, as reported in the media, while Eastwood has Granny Smith Festival by all the communities annually. Ethnic community names are usually formed organically through historical accumulation, and the "Korea Town" project might give the impression that it was artificially conceived by two Korean councilors.
  7. Cultural Representations: The "Korea Town" landmark's archway shape, bilingual labels in English and Korean, and the presence of hibiscus flowers, the national flower of the Republic of Korea, on street trash bins in Eastwood have raised questions about the use of national symbols from other countries on Australian territory.
  8. Potential Maladministration: The Ryde city council was aware of the controversy surrounding the "Korea Town" project but did not suspend construction or take other relevant actions. Additionally, extensive hearings and political consultations and negotiations were not conducted, leading to concerns about possible maladministration.
  9. Irreversible Impact: The naming of Eastwood as "Korea Town" will inevitably influence various trends related to business investment, migration, education, employment, and real estate prices and so on. Before approving the project, has the relevant party conducted a corresponding evaluation report and made it publicly available?
In response to the current situation, the Urban Development panel of the Australian Chinese Workers Association is going to  initiate the Ryder City Development Forum. We invite communities, professionals, and organizations from all relevant parties, including Korean community organizations, to engage in discussions concerning the "Korea Town" project and other related urban development projects. We also urge you to take the following actions:
  1. Apply for a court injunction to suspend the construction of the "Korea Town" project.
  2. Demand that the Ryde city council and the state government hold hearings and political negotiations.
  3. Request the state and federal governments to appoint an independent commission of inquiry to investigate the matter.
  4. Form a professional team consisting of lawyers, accountants, urban planners, folklorist, and other experts to compose relevant evaluation reports and submit them to relevant parties.
  5. Undertake all necessary legal and community actions.
We sincerely invite all citizens to join us in the pursuit of justice!
Joint Secretariat
[email protected]

微信扫码关注该文公众号作者

戳这里提交新闻线索和高质量文章给我们。
相关阅读
三大巨头联合署名!又一封“警惕AI、保卫人类”的公开信发出 | 大模型新鲜事俄罗斯会不会在本土演示自家核武威力中国是世界最大半导体市场,美国打压终将反噬自身红杉资本宣布重大变革!(附公开信)近400名大佬签署公开信警示AI风险,OpenAI创始人也在列常德市副市长、桃源县委书记庞波,因病逝世2023回国 同学聚会(图)终身追责!取消参选资格或院士称号!中国科学院发布公开信像核战争一样,AI可能灭绝人类:Geoffrey Hinton、Sam Altman等百名专家签署了一封公开信小鹏连续负毛利,预计四季度转正;减肥药发力,诺和诺德市值追上 LVMH要政府公开信息,先缴高价“信息处理费”?大家聊创新丨科创中心建设只关乎院士教授?“抓斗大王”回答:应是全体市民聚沙成塔的事业旧金山已死? 166年老店业主发公开信: 不再适合居住54位纽约市民主党人致拜登公开信:为移民危机做点什么!千万人口大市多条公交停运,市民:家门口唯一的公交车也停了!官方回应:暂无力恢复美国炸鸡届“天花板”Popeyes与巴黎市民的极限拉扯,火药味十足!投资并购,重塑第三代半导体市场家属致衡水市检察院周宏伟检察长的紧急公开信(转载)半导体市场持续“焦虑”迪士尼宣布退出澳洲实体媒体市场!影迷悲叹:一个时代的结束Being突发:西雅图老年亚裔夫妇被持枪歹徒抢劫;西雅图的公交车上弥漫着冰毒和芬太尼的味道,砖家:在安全范围内;培养世界公民的心路历程Being (2)纽约老人公寓改非移收容所!上千人抗议:美国是移民的土地,不是非法移民的家!偷信贼曝光!就是他!这个光头华裔男子徒手强开信箱, 布鲁克林8大道受害人公开录像视频!!三大巨头联合署名!又一封“警惕AI、保卫人类”的公开信发出六月17岁的公开信 将我推入深渊严肃查处院士增选候选人说情打招呼行贿受贿行为,终身追责!中国科学院发布公开信家属致枣强县法院院长王爱军的公开信(转载)地方动态丨珠海市欧美同学会召开会员代表大会第一次全体会议暨第二届理事会第一次全体会议娃哈哈向全体员工发放千万元额外奖励,又慕了!别人家的公司!元老离职!贝莱德中国区负责人变动,贝莱德:对中国市场的长期承诺不变迪士尼宣布退出澳洲实体媒体市场!影迷齐哀叹:一个时代的结束!突发!ChatGPT之父警告 AI可能灭绝人类,350名AI权威签署联名公开信
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。